Quantcast

Obama Gives In To Super PAC Lust, Crow Caws Ominously

2712obama.jpg
President Obama is pleased at the demonstration of a Cash Ray at the White House science fair (AP)

Last night President Obama announced that he will join his Republican counterparts in suckling from the opaque, monied teat of super PACs. "Our campaign has to face the reality of the law as it currently stands," Obama's campaign manager Jim Messina wrote in an email to supporters. "We're not going to fight this fight with one hand tied behind our back," Messina added later. "Democrats can't be unilaterally disarmed." Mutually assured destruction has been achieved.

Obama has a history of opposing super PACs and the Citizen's United decision that emboldened them. As Greg Sergeant notes, he and other Democrats attempted to pass a law that would outlaw non-disclosure and limit money pouring in from corporations and special interest groups.

But after tallying the fundraising numbers for the GOP's super PACs and outside groups ($94 million to the Democrats' $98 million war chest) it makes sense that the president, who has said he wants a second term "badly," would start pushing donors to give to the super PAC run by his former staffers, Priorities USA Action. Close aides and campaign surrogates will give speeches to the PAC, but the president and First Lady will not personally pimp the organization.

“Would I love to take some of the big money out of politics? I would,” Obama recently told NBC. “Unfortunately, right now partly because of Supreme Court rulings and a bunch of decisions out there, it is very hard to get your message out without having some resources.” And by "resources," the president means "an unyielding trough of money available to those willing to kneel before the altar of cynicism." The president's support of Priorities USA also makes it unlikely that he'll push for a constitutional amendment overturning CItizens United on the campaign trail (not that Congressional Republicans would allow it anyway).

To give you an idea of how much super PACs have influenced the campaign, there has been a 1,600% increase in super PAC-sponsored television ads compared to 2008, before the Citizens United decision.

Contact the author of this article or email tips@gothamist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • FranklinBluth

    Sure, he doesn't want to fight with one hand tied behind his back.  Just like in 2008 when he forwent public financing so he could raise and spend more money than McCain.

  • brooklynRick

    Sellout. if the republicans were running mccain sans palin I would vote for hiim

  • sauerkrautcity

    so you'd just go support someone else using super pacs?

  • brooklynRick

    Yeah true, I'm just done "hoping for change"

  • Typical Obama / Democrat strategy - we think this is bad and we feel bad about it but the "bad guys" (republicans) are doing it so we have to fight back.  All they are doing here is some political spin to make people think they are on their side but they are just as bad as the Republicans.  Wake up people - they are corporate whores, nothing more.

  • pendejito

    They are all corporate whores, but he does have a point. He can't be running a honest campaign when republican PACs will probably air  video footage of him in Africa and call him a Muslim non-American.

    He could stand for what he believes in and not use PACs, but it would be an unfair fight.

    The PACs are not the problem, its the sheep (voters) that watch the videos and take them seriously and go along with what they say.

  • So much for taking a stand and being a leader...

    Mudslinging is quite contagious

  • AaronRed99

    Thanks Barry! Just another example of throwing your ideals out the window for political expediency, and being a weasel about it to boot.

  • ANGRYGOD11

    Obama just saw the same beating Newt took in Florida you and I did because Newt didn't have Mitt's Super PAC resources.
    And now you want him to just take a beating in November? He might as well as get Joe Biden  to resign, have Mitt appointed as VP and quit now.

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@gothamist.com