Quantcast

Patti Smith Speaks Out About Current Hotel Chelsea Involvement

pattichelsea0112.jpeg
You can't go home again?

Earlier this week the remaining residents of the Hotel Chelsea received an invitation to a private Patti Smith concert to be held inside of the hotel, which is currently under new management and undergoing massive renovations. A major criticism has been that the hotel is being gutted of its original character that current and past residents helped create, along with the Bard family, who ran the hotel for a majority of its existence until ousted a few years ago. In fact, Patti Smith, thanks to the Bard family, lived there on two separate occasions.

When the concert, which will be held tomorrow night, was announced, residents asked that she cancel the show, assuming current developer Joseph Chetrit was involved. Now Smith has released a statement on her website, saying:

My current involvement with the Hotel Chelsea began some months ago when I heard rumors that the hotel would be leveled. I was devastated and entered in a dialogue with the architect, through a mutual friend.

He assured me this was not the case and every effort would be made to save and restore the building, which was greatly deteriorating. Having witnessed the demolition and redevelopment of much of our city I was at least hopeful that the hotel would stand.

Since then my few efforts on behalf of the Hotel have been unofficial and uncompensated. My dialogue has continued with the architect. My personal objectives have always been: To offer uncompensated advice as to the aesthetics of the renovation project. To council all concerned to develop positive communication with the rightful tenants. To be available in the future, without fee, in participating in the development and preservation of the artistic cachet of the hotel. To participate in the development of a possible artists-in-residence program.

My small performance for the tenants was my own idea. My hope is that we might have a nice evening and the opportunity to communicate directly. I am an independent person, not owned or directed by anyone. My allegiance is to the Hotel itself, and I have done nothing to tarnish it. It is very difficult for me to embrace change, but my great hope is to witness the Hotel Chelsea find a strong and positive place in the twenty-first century.

Two current residents of the hotel, who recently told us that Chetrit is trying to evict the remaining residents via the housing and Supreme court, have responded to Smith, saying:

Thanks Patti, for responding. If you are worried about the building being leveled, you can put your mind at rest—it’s landmarked and can’t be torn down. As for management efforts to save and restore the building there aren’t any. Instead they are gutting the rooms. We are worried about who the rightful tenants are going to turn out to be—obviously not the more than 30 who are being evicted and as for the artist in residence program, there are already plenty of those here. We are glad that you aren’t taking compensation but you should not let the Chetrits use you for propaganda purposes. If you want to give a concert for us great, but choose a neutral venue, one where Chetrit will not be sponsoring you. We still think you should cancel your event in the ballroom.

Your move, Smith.

Contact the author of this article or email tips@gothamist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • She canceled. Good.

  • blink667

    She played last night:
    http://vanishingnewyork.blogsp...

  • Too bad the Hotel Chelsea Tenants Association want to part of Patti's tunes! Read on: 
    http://www.thirteen.org/metrof...

  • Patti will address all and I trust she has the true best interest in mind for all here. She is coming from a place of benevolence from her own personal experience there, and I'm sure knows there are things she can't control that she doesn't like, ie: the evicted tenants. She will open this up at the show to have an open forum. People making accusations about Patti obviously don't know her  politics, and should open the ears of their heart a little wider. (Lost a little street cred? Who are you, you flippant moron?)

  • Cancel.

  • jettrash

    Patti has a point, Work together to achieve a solution. Chetrit may be a scumbag, but at least the tenants will have attention drawn to the plight of those being evicted by Patti's involvment.

  • canofpeas

    Patti lost some street cred as an androgynous counter-culture icon with this rationalization.  If she does a Cadillac commercial in the near future, I will not show surprise. 

  • luke_1

    Funny that she cares more about the building than the people living in it. Par for the course these days.

  • Patti didn't do enough research and obviously missed the fact that Chetrit is a scumbag.  Never good to hang those on your Christmas tree.  

  • moronthatlater

    What? They are clearing out the poor to make room for the rich in Manhattan? How can this be? How long has this been going on? If this can happen at Hotel Chelsea, then not even the mom-and-pop shops are safe. There will be restaurant chains replacing decades-old favorites, overpriced condos, $15 hamburgers, $3 coffees. We have to take a stand now, before it's too late!

  • Excuse me for sounding ignorant, but who was poor staying at the hotel? I know it housed a ton of artists (musicians,actors etc) but none of them came off as poor.
    It may have looked like a flop house..but it was far from being the Palace Hotel on the Bowery in the mid 80s

  • eyekantspel

    Just a few days ago I was thinking that it's been awhile since Jen Carlson wrote about the Chelsea Hotel.

  • so_annoyed_again

    that's some pretty shitty photoshop job

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@gothamist.com