Quantcast

Driver Who Killed Williamsburg Cyclist Says There's No Proof He Was Driving

120711lefevre.jpg
Mathieu Lefevere's mother Erika at a rally last week. (John Del Signore/Gothamist)

The man listed on an NYPD crash report as the truck driver who killed a Williamsburg cyclist has spoken for the first time. We placed multiple calls to the home of Leo Degianni last week after the family of the cyclist, Mathieu Lefevre, released a copy of the accident report. Degianni did not resond, but the Times is finally reporting on the Lefevre family's outrageous treatment by the NYPD, and reporter Jim Dwyer got a quote from Degianni, who left the scene of the accident and was not charged.

Degianni would not confirm that he was behind the wheel, and tells the Times only: "It hasn’t been proven yet. I have no comment." An NYPD spokesperson previously told us that the driver "did not know that he hit" Lefevre, who was struck at the T-intersection of Meserole Street and Morgan Avenue just after midnight on October 19th. Lefevre's family, who live in Canada, say the NYPD has refused to provide them with basic information and won't explain why the driver will not face any charges. In fact, they didn't even know the driver was getting off until they read about it in the press. An NYPD spokesman told Metro at one point, "That's why they call it an accident."

The Times article goes into the galling details of the family's futile attempt to obtain information from New York's Finest:

The 90th Precinct station house proved to be a House of No, as Ms. Lefevre described it: the family was told at the desk that there was no detective available to speak with them, that Mr. Lefevre’s property was not there and that no report on the accident was available.

So they waited. "After some time elapsed, I called the detective at the morgue, who had given us her phone number in case we ran into problems,” Ms. Lefevre said. Eventually, a detective in the 90th Precinct explained that the person handling the investigation of their son’s death would not be back for several days. “The detective we saw said he had no access to the information, that they do not share files,” Ms. Lefevre said.

After four hours, she said, they left.

And after a week of getting blown off by the NYPD, Dwyer reports that the Lefevres were "finally given their son’s belongings. They had been in the station house all along."

Last week, Transportation Alternatives has announced that they are conducting a comprehensive investigation into the NYPD's traffic crash investigation practices. Sadly, it seems there is no shortage of investigations to investigate; Streetsblog reports that a school bus driver was not charged after killing a man in the Bronx last night. The driver's explanation? "I didn’t see him."

Contact the author of this article or email tips@gothamist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • Guest
    Holy shit, you scumbags called a private citizen at home multiple times? Holy fuck.
  • YouandWhoseArmy3D
    I think that's called investigative reporting you idiot. Just because most of their stories are recycled doesn't mean the writers aren't allowed to do real work.

  • Guest
    They are NOT journalists, you moron. They post bullshit stories to a bullshit website to get hits for their advertisers.
  • StarryGordon
    In other words, they're journalists.  And why shouldn't they, or anyone else, investigate, especially if the police don't give a rat?
  • edgierthanyou
    well why do you read bullshit on a bullshit website, then comment bullshit on said bullshit website?
    are you with the bullshit police?
  • I belive this would be invoking the Bart Simpson defense, "I didn't do it, nobody saw me, can't prove a thing".  A sure sign that while there is a lack of solid evidence, he did do it.
  • pete_mac
    Gotta walk in to an NYPD station with a lawyer.
  • Accidents happen.  Not everyone is perfect.  If he wasnt drunk or high or blatantly disregarding traffic laws, this just amounts to an accident that is a tragedy.  People die all the time in crashes between 2 cars that are considered accidents.  It sux that he has to lie about whether he was driving but thats how things are nowadays.  If he says he was driving, even if he gets off clean with the law, he will get sued for all he is worth.  Everyone seems think the driver is always at fault if a cyclist dies.  Sometimes it is just an accident.  Cyclists know the risks when they ride in NYC and cant expect every driver to follow every single traffic rule at all times.  Accidents like this are a tragedy but calling the driver scum, who im sure is very upset by these events and still trying to protect himself and his family, doesnt make sense.
  • edgierthanyou
    yes accidents happen, and then you wait for the police and deal with it. this guy claims he didn't know he hit him -which sounds like bullshit. i have driven 40ft tractor trailers and the whole truck shifts when you clip a curb. so running over a human and bicycle, you're gonna feel that -let alone hear the screaming.
    secondly, "Everyone seems think the driver is always at fault if a cyclist dies."
    -vehicles are supposed to yield to bicycles and pedestrians.  he should be sued as well as the company he works for.
    and this has to be the dumbest thing i've heard all day "cant expect every driver to follow every single traffic rule at all times." get a clue
  • speakeasies
    Someone driving in such a way that they "don't see" another vehicle on the road or a ped crossing at an intersection is driving too fast by definition.  If a driver is not willing to exercise due caution while operating thousands of pounds of machinery that has such lethal potential, that person shouldn't be extended the privilege of driving. It's an accident when a tree falls on you in the forest -- not reasonably foreseeable or something you have much control over. It's not just an accident when a driver has the option of exercising due caution and chooses not to.
  • Fronko
    Actually, you're wrong.  When two cars are involved, the police establish fault very quickly.  If one car runs a red light and smashes into another, they rarely say, "Accidents happen."  They say, "One car ran a red light and caused the accident."

    So, let's pretend that all bikes are cars.  Maybe then the NYPD will start assigning responsibility when "drivers" get killed.
  • nunyadamn
    I agree with your premise however, every time the biking community is asked to "pretend they are cars" ie registration, insurance they balk.  Perhaps if these things were in place then there could be more pressure put on the police to investigate.
  • StarryGordon
    Why?   Obviously, the police feel sympathetic to drivers (because they drive, I guess) and not to cyclists or pedestrians.  That isn't going to change because the city bureaucracy harasses cyclists.

    The theory that the driver of a motor vehicle is not legally obliged to see anything is ridiculous.
  • nunyadamn
    I never said that a driver isn't legally obligated to see other people/things in roadway.

    My point is that if bikes were registered then the NYPD have an obligation to treat them with more respect then they currently provide.
  • StarryGordon
    You didn't say that drivers weren't obligated to see things.  The police do.  If a motor vehicle strikes a pedestrian or cyclist, and is not drunk or a fugitive, then the police most often say it's nobody's fault because the driver 'didn't see' the victim.  In other words, the driver is not legally obliged to see anything.  It's absurd, but that is the current practice.

    I don't see any reason why registration would induce the police to act differently in the case of cyclists.  And what about pedestrians?  Are we going to register them, too?
  • nunyadamn
    Really the main difference is insurance. The only reason they assign blame when no one is seriously injured is due to insurance companies demanding it. If bike riders were insured they would get more attention from the cops.

    To resist registering bikes is just wanting to negate any liability for your actions.

    The pedestrian issue is hyperbole. Besides do you have a birth certificate? an ID? You are registered.
  • StarryGordon
    Registration and insurance are separate issues.  I resist registering bicycles because it's nothing but another useless layer of bureaucratic government and would eventually become one more minor cash cow -- maybe $50 a year for nothing, same as most other city and state permits.  If, as you say, pedestrians are already registered, then so are cyclists.

    The only way police behavior is going to change is if their bosses tell the police to change it.
  • nunyadamn
    We are just going to have to agree to disagree. Fifty buck registration should be earmarked for maintaining and improving bike lanes. Since you are registering the bike not the person then no they are not registered. 

    If it is a matter of their bosses ie Kelly & Bloomberg telling them to change well the Mayor is big advocate for bike lanes etc.  So why the little regard for cyclist?
  • quixano
    Registering bikes is not a system that is going to work. I have friends who work in the city in various departments and different jobs. There is no way the city or state can afford to create a new department dedicated to licensing bikes or bikers. And, there is no city agency that could afford to bring it into their purview. It is utterly ridiculous and the reason why Bloomberg hasn't brought it out to a press conference. It may sound like a good idea on paper for some people, but there is just no money to do it.

    The "revenue" created from such a venture is not nearly close enough to cover what it would cost to create, run and administrate.

    Maybe if we closed a few more senior centers and schools and stop fixing potholes for like 6 months, then maybe poppa Bloomberg could spring for it.
  • bggb
    There's no evidence because the NYPD didn't look for any.

    Just like they didn't in this case:

    http://www.villagevoice.com/co...

    Funny how that works.

    Murder is ok if you do it with a car and claim you didn't see the person.

    Welcome to our city.
  • the_uptowner
    Don't you mean "Driver who ALLEGEDLYkilled Williamsburg Cyclist...?"  The guy is making a fair point...innocent until proven guilty.  Are you saying that he actually killed him?  That could be defamatory, ya know.
  • detroitsux1
    The NYPD continues to show how corrupt, inept, and lazy they really are. I haven't heard a good 10-00 story in awhile.
  • Fronko
    Hmm...

    No time card? No shift schedule? No payroll records?  Unless this evidence was destroyed, I'd say there is absolutely a way to prove whether or not Degianni was driving.
  • randomtransplant
    They should go after his employers liability insurance for damages and sue the company itself out of business. If this creep is going to take people out and just walk away, at least let it be people he knows.
  • johnnieutah
    The 90th PCT is my precinct, and every time I have dealt with them on any level it's resulted in baffling levels of frustration.
  • Curious, though, that he's switched from "I didn't know" to what amounts to "you can't prove I was driving". This is not the comment of a person with a clean conscience, if you ask me.
  • jibbly
    It's the comment of a person who doesn't want to go to jail and be sued at the expense of having a clean conscience.
  • Gwinny
    Indeed. Even if this scumbag does manage to get off scot-free, his conscience will haunt him for the rest of his life.
  • Seems like "no comment" would have sufficed for those goals.
  • Detex
    pretty much what I was thinking.
  • Sinchy
    I can imagine many circumstances where the driver of a large vehicle might not realize they hit someone, but it all depends on the particulars of the accident, and thats what we need the police to investigate.  In the Lefevre case there is some speculation that the driver ran a red light.
    I think every cyclist needs to assume that drivers cant see them unless they are right in front of the car, truck, bus, and always expect the worse.
  • bggb
    The latest report says the bicyclist was hit from behind.

    So either the driver was driving recklessly (not watching RIGHT IN FRONT OF THE TRUCK) or he knew.

    I'm going to go with the latter.
  • sauerkrautcity
    Agree, I have nothing against cyclists but many assume that the driver a big vehicle can always see them.  When I drive a regular sized car I don't always seem them.

    Sounds like this driver is a piece of shit though
  • edgierthanyou
    Leo Degianni sounds like a real scumbag.  "It hasn’t been proven yet. I have no comment." either you were driving or someone else was, so which is it?
  • CurmudgeonNYC
    Agreed, he sounds like a guilty piece of shit who is now figuring out that there may not be cameras to capture the death so why own up to it?
blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@gothamist.com