Quantcast

Newt Gingrich Endorsed By NH Paper That's Terrible At Picking Winners

112711newt.jpg
"Shall I make this one out to Mitt Romney?" (AP)

New Hampshire's only state-wide newspaper endorsed Newt Gingrich in the 2012 GOP primary race today, as many of you no doubt saw when you picked up the crisp copy of the Manchester Union Leader in your slippers, tears of joy streaming down your faces in the brilliant morning light. "A lot of candidates say they're going to improve Washington. Newt Gingrich has actually done that," the editorial states, neglecting to mention the pointless government shutdown, his $300,000 ethics sanction and the millions of dollars Gingrich takes from corporations as a "strategist." He's like Thomas Jefferson, only addicted to buying jewelry.

So how valuable is the Union Leader's (whose name now sounds Socialist to us) stamp of approval? They endorsed Ronald Reagan in 1976 and 1980, Pierre DuPont IV in 1988, Pat Buchanan in 1992 and 1996, Steve Forbes in 2000, and John McCain in 2008. This is great news for Gingrich, because presumably it means that Presidents Dupont, Buchanan, and Forbes will all endorse him too.

Despite this dubious track record, Mitt Romney was still trying to woo the Union Leader's publisher who pens endorsements, Joe McQuaid, by having dinner with him and his wife earlier this year. Romney must have had some serious garlic breath, but he's still ahead where it counts: 42% of primary voters in a recent poll back him, versus 15% for Gingrich. In a head-to-head matchup with President Obama, Romney leads among New Hampshire's voters 47% to 44%, but the president handily beats the former Speaker 52% to 40%.

Contact the author of this article or email tips@gothamist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • Love the photo of Gingrich - it's not a shit-eating grin.  It's even better than that, it's a Santorum-eating grin.

  • GentleGiant

    I like how every four years the Manchester Union Leader is described as "New Hampshire's only state-wide newspaper" by every media organization. It is as if they are implying that New Hampshire is so small that it only has one "state-wide" paper. What other states have "state-wide" papers? New York doesn't. Neither does New Jersey. Are the Boston Globe or Hartford Courant considered state-wide papers? If so they would be Massachusetts' and Connecticut's only state-wide papers.

  • seattlesnow

    you can get Today's Post in may places in Buffalo as the Globe & Herald is sold through The Commonwealth but then again New Hampshire is small as I learned that in 2008 

  • GentleGiant

    You can buy the Times most everywhere upstate, and all papers are obviously available online. Availability is not the point. The point is that no paper in NYS has it as their mission to report on news across the whole state.

  • schmeep

    And how about airline food?  Don't get me started!

  • union leader is to new hampshire what the post is to new york

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@gothamist.com