Quantcast

[UPDATE] Gruesome Mystery: Child's Foot Found On Front Lawn In Queens

110711foot.jpg Good morning, and yes, this headline is accurate: a child's foot was found in Queens. [UPDATE BELOW] Horrible, right? This gruesome discovery was made in Rosedale, a suburban neighborhood in the southern part of the borough, around 4:30 p.m. yesterday when area man Paul Lawrence was taking out the trash. The little foot was found on the grass beside the garbage cans.

"It looked like a piece of meat," Lawrence tells the Daily News. "It was a skinless piece of meat with bone. When we looked at it a little closer, we decided it looked like a foot." Lawrence called his neighbor, Sheldon Pouchet, to help him decide what to do. Pouchet tells the Post, "I thought it was a Halloween prop, but it wasn’t. I said, ‘Let’s let the [police] do their job and figure it out.’ If you see something like that, you don’t touch it. You call forensics."

Investigators believe the foot once belonged to a child between the ages of three and four. A woman who lives in an apartment above Lawrence tells the Post, "That’s somebody’s baby! An animal is one thing, but to find a human body part is a whole other story. It’s enough to freak me out. I live here with my 12-year-old daughter. I’m ready to move." Police brought dogs and searched the property and surrounding area, but no other body parts were found. "We really don't know what's going on," one officer tells the tabloid.

Update 10:13: a.m.: Now the Medical Examiner says it was not a human foot after all, but an animal foot. The NYPD press office had no information about what species of animal the foot belonged to, but stay tuned for more updates, when we'll no doubt learn that it was not a foot, but actually an ear, and Dennis Hopper is mixed up in this somehow.

Contact the author of this article or email tips@gothamist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • guest327

    Doesn't matter if it was an animal foot or not, who ever did it is a sicko and will eventually move on to humans. So soon they may actually be finding a child's foot if they don't catch who did this and actually lock them up for our safety.

  • TheRealCannibal

    gothamist should start every article with a crossed out 'this headline is accurate'

  • It's Daddy, shithead! Where's my bourbon?

  • throwawayaccount20111102

    I was *really* looking forward to seeing a photo of the foot, though I knew I would be disappointed.

  • theevilerone

    Lucky rabbit's foot?

  • PicoPhreako69

    More like UNlucky.

  • jibbly

    Wait, what?  Now it's an animal foot?  How did the original "investigators" decide that it was not only a human foot, but one that belonged to a toddler between the ages 3 and 4yo?

    Me am so confused.  Me need more coffee.  Jibbly be right back.

  • candyazzbb

    i have to agree with you.

  • she wore bluuuuuuue velvet....

  • TrollyMcTrollington

    Apologies in advance....

    Hell, I can get you a toe by 3 o'clock this afternoon... with nail polish. These fucking amateurs...

  • shocktheday

    When and if you have children one day, you'll come to realize these type of jokes are incredibly stupid.  If you already have children, god save them.

  • schmeep

    Having children has nothing to do with this; adding to civilization in a positive way does.

  • schmeep

    Just because you know how to type doesn't mean you should: societal filters are our friends.

     Good on ye for living up to your name, you terrible person.

  • schmeep

    Yeah, this news was not the best way to start this Monday, especially fighting the Daylight Savings blahs.

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@gothamist.com