Quantcast

Government Death Panels ARE Real, But Only One American Killed So Far

93011terror.jpg
Anwar al-Awlaki speaks in a video message posted on radical websites. (AP)

The U.S. may not have those "death panels" that Sarah Palin once famously warned about, but we do apparently have a secret panel in charge of making a "kill or capture" list for the executive branch. Reuters is reporting that the panel, a subset of the White House's National Security Council, doesn't have a public record, any laws establishing its existence or guiding rules, and the White House is declining to talk about it. So maybe Ron Paul is onto something?

The panel has come to light in the wake of the recent death of Al Qaeda leader Anwar al-Awlaki, who was put on one of these "kill or capture" lists. Awlaki was, as far anyone is aware, the only American to have ever been put on the list. Details about how the panels work are unfortunately (and understandably) murky, however:

[Officials] said targeting recommendations are drawn up by a committee of mid-level National Security Council and agency officials. Their recommendations are then sent to the panel of NSC "principals," meaning Cabinet secretaries and intelligence unit chiefs, for approval. The panel of principals could have different memberships when considering different operational issues, they said.

And at least in Awlaki's case it appears that "lawyers, including those in the Justice Department, were consulted before Awlaki's name was added to the target list." As for how the government is trying to explain how this could be legal:

Two principal legal theories were advanced, an official said: first, that the actions were permitted by Congress when it authorized the use of military forces against militants in the wake of the attacks of September 11, 2001; and they are permitted under international law if a country is defending itself.

Considering the fact Obama campaigned against George W. Bush's expansive use of executive power, this is not going to please the base. Especially with the president's approval rating in the crapper.

Contact the author of this article or email tips@gothamist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • xXxMExXx

    Sure puts Bush-era water boarding in perspective...

  • matteus

    I don't care if it's legal or not, it wasn't done in the transparent way that Obama seemed to campaign. It's clear he'll stomp all over an individual's rights if it makes his job easier. They should take away his Nobel peace prize: the only label he deserves is 'the better of two evils,' and he's close to losing that title.

  • luke_1

    So basically: anything can be justified by invoking national security, er... "terrorism." Hell, terrorism is the reason that the Occupy Wall Street people might get cracked down on one last time.

    #2 best excuse to do justify anything: taxes.

  • imadick

    assassinations were supposed to be illegal, but we're only now caring because this one terrorist is american?

  • U.S. Death Panels/

    Are Staffed by High Level Drones/

    Murderous white men/

    #haiku

  • xXxMExXx

    Earth to WesternQueensLand… Our Commander In Chief is not white. 

  • thePinkSuperhero

    Just like on the West Wing!

  • pendejito

    I knew "Obamacare" would lead to this. I wonder if Anwar al-Awlaki would still be around today had he had private healthcare.

  • valerick

    This is the dumbest thing I've read all week. Have a cookie!

  • Seems to me there were two different authorizations of force after 9/11, one for Afghanistan, and one for Iraq.

    Haven't seen one for Yeman.

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@gothamist.com