Quantcast

Judge Blocks NYC's "Abortion Disclosure" Law

2011_07_gavel2.jpg A federal judge blocked a recently passed law that requires "crisis pregnancy centers" to disclose whether they offer abortions and whether there's licensed medical care. Judge William Pauley called the law "unconstitutionally vague," noting, "This court presumes a threat of irreparable harm to plaintiffs’ first amendment rights."

A March Daily News article illustrated how "crisis pregnancy centers" operate: Converted buses are set up near Planned Parenthood centers or abortion clinics, with workers saying, "We can do a free ultrasound and help you with prenatal care, all you have to do is say yes to life." However, the CPCs are not licensed medical providers, and City Councilwoman Jessica Lappin (D-Manhattan) said at the time, "If you're going to be giving sonograms, it should be under the supervision of a doctor." The law was intended to prevent the centers' "deceptive practices," further pointing out, "Some pregnancy services centers have engaged in conduct that wrongly leads clients to believe that they have received reproductive health care and counseling from a licensed medical provider."

Now, with Pauley's decision, anti-abortion group 12 Frontline Pregnancy Centers founder Chris Slattery was in a good mood, telling the News, "This is a slap at the mayor, City Council President Christine Quinn and all the council members who voted for this law. We are completely thrilled that we have been vindicated of our First Amendment rights." Speaker Quinn, however, characterized the ruling, as "deeply disappointing" and a "disservice to women... Today's decision means that pregnancy service centers can continue deceiving women who seek their services."

Planned Parenthood NYC Vice President of Public Affairs, Simone Ward, says, "We are disappointed, but not discouraged by this ruling, and will stand by the New York City Council as they continue to fight to protect the health and safety of the men, women and teens we serve as well as of all New Yorkers. Let’s not forget, these centers purposefully deceive women, and dissuade them from seeking safe, legal and often lifesaving health care. They have lied to our patients, and given our patients false information under the guise of providing factual medical advice. This law has nothing to do with ideology and everything to do with protecting New Yorkers, and removing the barriers that prevent the men, women and teens of New York City have from accessing safe, high-quality medical care."

The city plans to appeal the ruling.

Contact the author of this article or email tips@gothamist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • As I posted on the CNS News website where this was posted before, the city is absolutely correct to appeal, as I see no First Amendment issue here. "Truth in services" laws do not infringe on First Amendment rights.

    The Second Circuit needs to reverse this ruling.

  • xXxMExXx

    Yet another example of Democrats not caring about First Amendment rights when they don’t support their argument. 

  • First Amendment rights don't cover stuff like shouting fire in a movie theater, or giving false medical advice.

  • xXxMExXx

    The judge apparently doesn’t agree.

  • That certainly is true; then again, there are all kinds of injustices in the world.  Doesn't stop me from pointing them out.

  • Next week it will be legal for paralegals--or just any random person on the street--to provide legal advice and representation. UPL doesn't matter anyway right?

    If this isn't EXACTLY the same concept as allowing people without licenses to use medical equipment and impersonate doctors and nurses while providing people with entirely false information, kindly explain why.

  • Hey, why should they have to have truth in advertising!  Taking advantage of women who are in a difficult place in order to coerce them is totally free speech, right?  After all they are just women-- their bodies are totally public property.  I'm pretty sure!

  • ANGRYGOD11

    If I hung around a bank, waiting to find desperate people, and offered unprofessional financial advice, I'd in prison. You can't legally cut hair without a license and these guys offer free medical procedures from a bus, just like in porn.

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@gothamist.com