Quantcast

City Slashes Free Food For Kids Program By 22 Percent

201107_schoollunch.jpg The Department of Education's main focus is, reasonably, educating the next generation. But it also serves another important function: feeding hungry children. And that is true when school is in session and when it is not. In fact, between the end of June and September 2 the city offers free breakfasts and lunches to any child who asks at hundreds of locations across town, no ID or paperwork required. Only problem? This year there are 100 fewer locations available than there were last year!

The Daily News reports that as part of the DoE's recent budget trimming, which included taking $10.8 million from its food budget, there are only 372 no-strings Summer Meals spots operating this year, down 22 percent from the 478 working in 2010 (there are more than 1,000 free summer meal locations around the city, but most are for kids affiliated with summer school and day camp programs).

The DoE, while acknowledging the reduction in free summer meal locations, explains that the situation is about resources. "Our goal is to serve as many children as possible, and keeping underutilized locations open doesn't make sense if we can direct those resources to locations where we can serve more children," spokesperson Margie Feinberg said.

There is no question that reduced locations will make it harder for many children to eat this summer. But it is worth noting that there are still hundreds of locations available across the five boroughs. If you or someone you know has a hungry child, you can find the nearest active locations for free breakfast and lunch services here or you can call 311.

Contact the author of this article or email tips@gothamist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • winning1234

    100 "fewer" locations, not "less".

  • How about don't have a kid if you can't feed it. Or as Michael Jackson once sang, "if you can't feed the baby, then don't have a baby...yeah, yeah."

  • ANGRYGOD11

    A typical case is daddy said he would take care of everything, but then disappears. Not the kids fault.

  • FU Boy

    You're right.  It's the mothers for trusting an asshole.  And the Asshole's for being as he is.

  • winning1234

    But the kid will end up having a baby later in life and then disappearing, so I blame the future version of the kid.

  • edgie168

    So the kids should suffer for it?

  • No; their mommy and daddy who are already getting benefits of some kind should whip out their card and buy them some food.

    That's why they get them in the first place, isn't it?  That EBT card and those WIC checks?If you're poor enough to "need" the food, then there's already a program feeding you.

  • m015094

    When is the last time you saw a malnourished kid?  These kids are fat as shit. 

  • mattbrooklyn

    God forbid we raise taxes and miss this chance to kill more of the poor by malnutrition.

    Actually, here's a modest proposal: Let's let poor people sell themselves or their malnourished kids as big game targets for the rich to hunt. The poor learn valuable lessons about free enterprise (and get exercise by running from bullets) and the rich get to learn to defend themselves from evil big brother. It's a win-win!

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@gothamist.com