Quantcast

Anthony Weiner "Can't Say With Certitude" If Crotch Is His

2011_05_weincert.jpg
Rep. Weiner at the Capitol today (AP)

So maybe Anthony Weiner's wiener is that big? When asked earlier today by Luke Russert if the photo of a man's crotch sent from his Twitter account was his, he replied "You know, I can’t say with certitude.” He had to bring certitude into it? Don't most men know a) what their underwear looks like and b) when their engorged junk has been photographed?

Weiner continued by explaining “My system was hacked, pictures can be manipulated, dropped in and inserted. One reason I asked a firm to look at what the heck happened here … is to see maybe something was manipulated, maybe something was dropped in.”

The married Congressman continues to say he was hacked though. “We don’t know for sure what happened here,” Weiner added. “But let’s try to take a step back. This is a circumstance where someone committed a prank on the Internet, spoofed me, made fun of me, whatever. We’re taking it seriously in as much we want to make sure it doesn’t happen again.”

Here's the video, where Weiner's statement about certitude doesn't sound quite as strange as it reads:

Contact the author of this article or email tips@gothamist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • Andrew W
    This is so bizarre. The Daily Kos explanation of the supposed hoax seemed to make sense, but why is Weiner being so weird about it?
  • rotstan
    Gov. Schwarzenegger would like to thank Rep. Weiner for claiming the sleazeball spotlight award for his very own.
  • rotstan
    Gov. Schwarzenegger would like to thank Rep. Weiner for claiming the sleazeball spotlight award for his very own.
  • splicernyc
    One name: Roger Stone -- famed GOP dirty trickster and all-around scumbag. He's already wallowed in the shit of NYS politics and since Weiner is going to run for mayor, why not again.
  • It's pretty amusing that this is categorized under "News"....
  • inoyourider21
    Oopsy.
  • LazyNanny
    Here's my new theory: he orchestrated this whole scheme in order to deflect attention from the homo rumors, and to establish some hetero bonafides in advance of the next mayoral election.
  • xXxMExXx
    Couldn’t have happened to a bigger dick. Hopefully his wife will throw him out on his ass.
  • Joey__Blow
    dang.. if he did it .. he is one congressman that slams the repthugs.  now it will be wiener jokes ALL the time....
  • Guest
    He's a Dem, it's a badge of honor.
  • and, if it was wrapped in a diaper, he'd be a republican.
  • Mr Mel
    And if had sent to another guy.
  • Guest
    Too bad he isn't the weiner loving DEMOCRAT chairman of the House Financial Services Committee From 2007 to 2011 and who put his DEMOCRAT lover in at Fannie Mae while he screeched there was nothing wrong and we needed to keep giving LIAR & NINJA loans to people who couldn't pay them back and let the banks (who were contributing mostly to DEMOCRATS)  package those toxic loans that to our housing collapse. You mean like THAT?
  • Mr Mel
    What are you babbling about?
  • edgie168
    HEY you DON'T need to CAPITALIZE every OTHER word BECAUSE we "GET" what YOU'RE trying to SAY here, OKAY? And IF you REPUBLICANS had DONE such a GREAT job WITH the ECONOMY, how DID we END up IN this MESS to BEGIN with, HMMMMMMMMM?
  • edgie168
  • RabbiLaFunque
    This scandal could be velly damaging  in his upcoming re-erection campaign.
  • Mr Mel
    If he had shown his stuff in Macy's window  he would still win.
  • I think it's simply building to it's inevitable climax which will probably just disappoint his wife or blow up in his face.
  • Dirk
    Will it? My thinking is that it will blow over and quickly be forgotten about.
  • RabbiLaFunque
    heh heh...you said "blow" ...heh heh
  • Dirk
    Lol.
  • Guest
    Yeah, it'll never stand up in the court of public opinion.
  • longacre
    I was actually willing to give him the benefit of the doubt. No way he'd be that dumb, I thought. That is, until he started talking and seemed to confirm that the photo was indeed him.

    If the photo IS him and he did NOT send it himself, it means at least one of his computers was hacked, not just his Twitter account. That would be an extremely serious security breach. Considering the number of committees he is on there is likely some very sensitive and/or classified info on his computers that any number of crooked businessmen, foreign intelligence and terrorists would benefit from. How could he not want to involve law enforcement?

    There's only one explanation: He sent it on purpose. My theory is he meant to DM it to this girl and he accidentally posted it publicly.
  • colorreg
    Hey, Friday protest demanding Weiner's resignation! Who's in?
  • stuart hynes
    Please no... Weiner is the best guy there.
  • tijuanatornado
    I don't know about y'all but.... it is all very suspicious to me....


  • mmheidelberger
    Oh, my eyes have been soiled...
  • jibbly
    Ow, my eyeball!
  • Dirk
    This whole thing gets weirder and weirder by the minute.
  • whatidsay
    "I served with Weiner's weiner, I knew Weiner's weiner, Weiner's weiner was a friend of mine. Hacker, you are no Weiner's weiner"
  • SrslyDude
    Seeing the yearbook picture in articles about "Weinergate" is skeeving me out more than a little bit.
  • Vin229
    Its not that hard to figure out if the crotch in that picture belongs to you Mr. Weiner...
  • Guest
    pun??
  • Minabee
    What a strange response.
    Also, I just cannot get over how amazing it is that someone with the last name Weiner might be taken down for taking a photo of his weiner. I mean, really. If I were in government and my name was Doreen Upcrotch McVulva, you know what I would definitely make sure was never ever photographed? Exactly.
  • BobSantos
    Dolores.
  • robingee
    Ruh-roh. Either it's him or he doesn't mind people thinking it's him.
  • Or he has dick pics on his computer-- which is what I'd assume?
  • gem22
    It's also possible that s full length picture of him was taken of him in his underwear...why knows why...he may not even have been aware that he was being photographed until it was done....and the picture was cropped to make it look like someone was focusing on a specific region.  That's what he may have meant by manipulating.  Not a guy, but how many guys have been photographed in their underwear at one time or another?  You tell me.
blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@gothamist.com