Interesting that Ms. Julia Moreno can speak on behalf of ALL "young women". What social psychology background does Ms. Moreno have to come with her comment of, "From the beginning of time, this is what girls do — young girls, inexperienced. They’re not mature. They get drunk. They do these things and, you know, they want sympathy." What credibility or part does she have in all of this? She is very unapologetic in making women rape victims look as merely regretful drunks. 
So on behalf of all feminists thank you for validating that women like YOU simply reinforce stereotypes in our society.
Oh by the way. Now that we are in the topic of women- how does it feel to know that your husband was cuddling the "young, inexperience girl" on the job. 

Yes, every young woman who wants to get back at friends who left her makes up a detailed rape story, accuses a cop, and goes through a rape examination and a lengthy trial.

Is it any surprise that a man like this could only find a complete moron to marry him?

Lets see I am a woman and have been drinking and I am in the custody of two of NYPD's finest. So I am going to yell rape, go to the Emergency room, file charges then make up a consistent story, however their is certain pieces of evidence either missing or lacking and the offenders walk free and the accuser is re-victimized. Yes, and I will demand face time with the media both before and after so I can further humiliate myself.

Does anyone else see anything wrong with this story, yes I concede that some women file false claims and yes the numbers are small, but this is way, way, way out there.

The cops wife with the bad case of diarrhea of the mouth gives a stronger case that the cop was guilty and she suspected but is relieved that it went her way. This is wrong man way so wrong.

Maybe, just maybe they'll be enough heat kept on to nullify these morons and make them inconsequential so the Department has to let them go.

Oh-  . . ."it's the accusers fault. . .that so much was taken from her life. . ." 
. . .and NOT her dumb-ass moronic, now ex-cop husband.  It seems to me that these low-end two deserve each other. . .  ( They'll probably be divorced in a year or so )!!   

I'm kinda thinking the NYT is a  pile of urine soaked rag for giving this Soprano wannabe satan-couple the time of day.

They didn't even scoop the story, the Post did.

"he said, before being cut off midsentence by his wife, Julia, who tapped his knee and chimed in"

They arn't even reporting "just the facts". Thats editorializing them into normalcy for the sake of an interview.

I hope soon they'll interview some rape victims talking about how intimidation and tabloid journalism don't make their lives any easier.

I have to wonder what your response would be if the Post or the Times went in to interview the woman and she said she was leaving her husband because she can not longer trust him and she'd rather stand with the alleged rape victim. I guess then we'd all be praising her courage.

So should they have ditched the story when she started to speak her mind? Why? Because women like her shouldn't be heard in polite, educated society? What kind of journalism would that be?

A good story shows its characters growing through the progression of the plot.

A good interview has something of merit to say.

A good newspaper can (used to?) suss out the difference between click generators and puerility.

Look back over your last two comments. First, it's bad journalism because "They aren't even reporting 'just the facts'." Now, it's a bad story because the characters aren't shown "growing through the progression of the plot." First, they're "normalizing"; now you're narrativizing.

Both good journalism and good stories relate human conflict, and human drama is often full of error, contradiction, and ambiguity. One can admire this woman's loyalty and steadfastness while balking at her version of the facts. The truth of her love, her marriage vows, her jealousy, her anger--whatever motivates her to speak--might just transcend the facts. In any case, her story is certainly part of the larger plot, isn't it?

The interview & the decision to run it are disgusting. People who buy into it such as yourself are misguided at best.

Save the bother. I don't seriously consider what you have to say about it. As far as I'm concerned what I find trashy and amoral arn't opinions you'll change.

I may sometimes be misguided, but at least I'm not permanently yoked to an elitist ideology that won't have it's morning coffee disturbed by "disgusting" stories.

And, frankly, I'm not the least concerned with changing your smug opinion about what's "trashy and amoral"; I doubt anything could.

misguided, with a tea-partiers understanding of the word elitist.

Tea-partier? Boy, you're really losing your nerve. As long as you're trotting out the usual suspects, why not Nazi? Fascist? Come on! You can do better than that.

The wife repeats that there was no DNA. He admitted to wearing a condom on tape. She cant be denying he was in the victim's bed while she was puking and almot naked. He admitted that much, probably to cover his ass because he figured his DNA might be in the bed as hair or skin. But the schemer knew enought to get a condom and I guess he and his lookout did a thorough clean up job during thier four visits to her apartment. The fact that there was no DNA at all is suspicious, considering he claims he was "cuddling" and rubbing her back and singing bon jovi to her.

maybe if your husband didn't "cuddle" her with a condom, your lives wouldn't be so different... the girl robbed them of so many things? More like dirtbag robbed her of free will.

Is it misogynistic of me to ask to see how the woman looks like? 

it's "how the woman looks," or "what the woman looks like."

Perhaps not misogynistic, but somewhat illiterate to  "see how the woman looks like".  

ugh.... enough. My only solace is that she is making an utter fool out of herself and her [] husband.

Sad to say, next thing we'll see is that the two get a reality tv show... Heaven help us. 

"From the beginning of time, this is what girls do — young girls,
inexperienced. They’re not mature. They get drunk. They do these things
and, you know, they want sympathy. In his case I believe she wanted
sympathy from her friends because they threw her out of her own party."

Regardless of this case, I find this woman's remarks disgusting. What a lovely message to send out there to REAL RAPE VICTIMS - "You silly little drunk girls! Stop getting drunk & crying rape because you feel humiliated!" Blame the victim, much?

“Being a realist, you know that deed is a messy business,” 
What a clunky sentence.