My God, it's true.  I saw designs for this bomb, and thought it was too foolish to build.  On activating the Weapon of Mass Gayness, the device shouts "SUPER!" and launches itself at the biggest dick in the room. 

We should closely monitor Newt over the next few days for increases in sashaying, bitching and phallic food consumption. 

From what I can tell, this successful test will only embolden The Gays to move forward in their weapons development. 

God help us all. 

meh. chest pooping might have been more effective.

Give Newt a Cleveland steamer?  Fantastic - but only if Rosie O'Donnell does the job.

Pity is was the fat type of glitter and not the tiny type that's damn near impossible to get off without a shower. Newt got off lightly...this time.

Leonard Bernstein has something to say on the matter...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...

"do it like a man"  on the way out ...
awesome.

Not cool.

Look, Newt's a douchebag -- but the rule is "hands off."  You don't hit politicians with glitter, you don't throw water balloons, you don't attack them physically in any way.  Why not?  Because...hello, idiot, you're not the only one in the world who can do these things.  Think of all the Tea Party types out there who go to bed at night fantasizing about doing evil things to "evil" "liberals."  You really want to make this part of the political process?  You really want it to be physical, when all those gun-toting whack-jobs already think "their nation" is under siege?

You want to get noticed, put on fairy suit and dance around in Times Square.  But don't attack a politician -- even if it's this asshole. 

What a looser.

What a "looser".  Learn to spell

Damn it man, it's "loser" as in "what a loser." I hate that misspelling.

The really stupid thing is that it doesn't even make sense. Nobody thinks the opposite of "win" is "loose." And in an age when one of the most popular shows on TV is The Biggest Loser, one would think people might get a clue from seeing the word on screen so often.

But it's futile. This is one of those viral errors that will only grow, illogical though it is. It's like that other one that's so prevalent nowadays. "Would of, could of, should of."

It's...actually a bit of a running, self-deprecating joke (which is why you may see it frequently).  The idea is that the speaker is himself a loser -- as he is unable even to properly spell the word "loser."

Other examples would be "Geez, how dum is you?"  "What an idoit!"  "You spel terible!"  That sort of thing.

Yeah, it's not that funny, I know.  But life is what it is.  (And, yes, I just explained an internet meme to avoid someone thinking I had poor speling and grammer -- and, no, that doesn't bother me in the slightest.)

Hmmm, that one is easily lost in translation, though.  I like the dum is you and spel terible ones. 

Sorry, I've been seeing it more and more over the last few years even from otherwise intelligent people. It spreads like herpes, and must be stopped.

Democrats carry guns too. 

True -- and the last time we tried that approach to resolving an issue, the liberals won.

Still...maybe not the result we should aim for.

 Now they sure do...