Quantcast

Indian Point Safe, Radiation Good For You, Says Area Man

032211indian.jpg Lieutenant Governor Robert Duffy and Director of State Operations Howard Glaser are meeting with regulators from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission today to discuss the risks facing the Indian Point nuclear plant in the event of an earthquake. You'll recall that the plant, which is about 25 miles from city limits, is at the intersection of two different fault lines. But there is nothing to worry about, say the plant's owners and this area man on the street, who gives NY1 the quote of the day:

"Nuclear power is the safest power there is," said a knowledgeable man on the street who declined to give his name. "The fears of radiation are ridiculous. You're radioactive; I'm radioactive. Tiny doses of radioactivity are really helpful they've discovered. People in Colorado get two or three times the dose of normal radioactivity, compared to what we get. So I say more nuclear power plants!" Then a smaller, second head growing out of his neck chimed in, "And more equal rights for mutants!" (Watch at the 1:30 mark.)

Entergy Corp - which runs the plant - says the reactors are safe and the plant can withstand a magnitude 6.0 earthquake. John McCann, plant owner Entergy's vice president for nuclear safety, licensing and emergency planning, told Westchester County lawmakers yesterday, "I would say categorically that Indian Point is not susceptible to the type of earthquake that occurred in Japan. And more importantly, perhaps, to the tsunami." Former mayor and presidential hopeful Rudy Giuliani also says there's nothing to fear, and he's certainly an authority, having been hired by Entergy as a security consultant.

Others, like Governor Cuomo, have called for the plant to be shut down. And federal inspectors will soon conduct a full review of the plant's safety. Asked about the possibility of an earthquake, Energy Secretary David Chu said Sunday, "It is an issue. We're going to have to look at whether this reactor should remain [in operation]. This is not to say that we believe that reactor is unsafe." No, not at all, but it sounds like Entergy might have forgotten the three most important rules of nuclear plant building: location, location, location.

Theoretical physics professor and author Dr. Michio Kaku was on The Late Show with David Letterman last night talking about Indian Point, which the talk show host is strongly opposed to. "We have so many gangs and so much violence in this city, why don't we send some of these gangs up there to just take the thing apart?" asked Letterman. Kaku replied, "That's the Letterman solution!"

By the way, last week a magnitude 4.7 earthquake in east-central Canada was felt as far south as New York's Adirondack Mountains. And if you're not cool with Indian Point, you may want to join forces with the Rock the Reactors movement. (Check out the awesome website.) The group's organizer Remy Chevalier tells us why this issue is so important to him:

Any asshole with a surface to air missile can shoot it into the water intake and demolish the cooling system… Any asshole can drive a plane into the plant… a multitude of calamities could happen… Can you imagine trying to evacuate Manhattan? The whole thing is insane, has been insane since the beginning. The only reason we’re using enriched uranium and now plutonium to boil water to drive a turn of the last century steam turbine is because these jokers at the Pentagon needed to justify the cost of all these centrifuges! Why it’s important to me? Because it’s the ultimate insult to life… enriched uranium and plutonium do not exist in nature, we created it out of arrogance, like the tower of Babel…

Chernobyl wasn’t enough? Indian Point wasn’t enough? GE had to go and impose their sick brand of ridiculous pretense on the Japanese people, and put their reactors all stacked in a row on top one of the most active earthquake fault on the planet? We can make iPads, we can make Tesla Motor cars? And we can’t find a way to capture electrons from the ambient environment where they are free for the taking? We had to create the worse possible poison man has ever known, and fuck with it? Please don’t get me going ok? That’s why I don’t talk about the reasons why… because if by now people don’t know why so many are so passionate about their anti-nuclear convictions, there’s really nothing we can do to help them… Read my book ELLE on Earth, I was there in the room when that oaf of a man, Pompidou, sold out France to Westinghouse… France is living on borrowed time… one close call after the other… all for what? A few more light bulbs? Buy LEDs!


Contact the author of this article or email tips@gothamist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • Inconcievable de Impublishable
    They can't even spell "energy," and they expect us to trust them?
  • That Rock the Rectors site hurts my eyes
  • Dan
    If you get rid of Indian Point the cost of electricity in NYC will skyrocket (as well as needing to build more power pants to replace it, don't even think about using unstable wind for that). Indian Point 2 and IP3 generate roughly 2000 megawatts. NYC uses roughly 7000 to 12000 megawatts depending on the time of year and time of day.
  • Sinchy
    Futurist Ray Kurzweil believes that solar power is following the same path a computer chips, doubling in power while halving in cost every 1-2 years. If this "moore's law" trend continues solar will be completive in 5 years and will supply all the power we need in 20.
    We need an energy party in America. We should base our future around getting to free energy ASAP.
  • GothamExtremist
    "the plant can withstand a magnitude 6.0 earthquake"...........
    as soon as this was said, GOD plans a 6.5.
  • robingee
    Hey, maybe GOD hates you, don't bring the rest of us into it.

    EXXXTREEEME!
  • GothamExtremist
    Tokyo is 150 miles away and people are afraid of radiation, we are only 30 fucking miles away. Need to locate and execute the nut job that approved this site.
  • Dan
    Generation ideally is located close to load. Study electrical engineering then ask that question again.
  • robingee
    >> Generation ideally is located close to load >>

    What does this mean?
  • chuzzlewit
    "generation" is where the edible sand is being procured from. "load" is how much sand you are putting in the pockets of your ghetto gown. to have the two far apart makes things inefficient.
  • robingee
    Hey now, it's more like 50 miles. We'll be OK!
  • GothamExtremist
    I was across the Hudson from this place on Saturday. My trip computer says 34 miles from lower Manhattan. This WILL be the prime target of any terror group, you take down the WTC and we just build new ones, but you fuck that plant up, the whole NY Metro is DONE.
  • robingee
    Yeah I have been by there many times. It sure is ugly. Those people across the river have a crapass view of it.
  • robingee
    I love Area Man! How knows everything in The Onion.
  • Guest
    You know, if hippies weren't so dirty, stinky, and lazy, maybe we'd have wind power and solar power as our two main sources of energy, instead of coal and nuclear power.
  • Ph
    No 'renewable' source of energy short of blanketing the entire high plains area of this country with solar collectors is ever going to satisfy more than a small fractional of our electricity demand.

    Same thing goes with Wind, biofuels and tidal action. Each of these (including solar) is extremely useful for reinforcing the system in different niche deployments but sadly will probably never be able to top splitting the atom or burning hydrocarbons.

    We should build more nuclear breeder reactors because honestly, its the only thing that's ever going to supplant fossil fuel burning any time within this lifetime or the next.

    And plus, increased research and interest in nuclear energy production hopefully will push us to the real game changer: practical fusion power.
  • JoeyBagadonuts
    It cracks me up that people so frequently and so confidently claim that solar power will NEVER get the job done.

    First of all, that's absolute loser talk. Stop it.

    Second, I find these utterances typically come from people who claim to believe in Amercan know-how and American exceptionalism, and believe that America can do whatever it sets its mind to, but apparently that faith doesn't extend to the development of practical solar technologies. That's one thing, sorry, that we just can't do. Bummer.

    Third, gas and oil wells ALREADY blanket BLM lands across the entire country.

    I assume back in 1955 you would have predicted that those room-size "computers" were novel but ultimately useless.
  • unretrofiedforu
    I forget where I heard this, and I'd like to look into it - however it's been said the midwest is the new 'middle east' for wind and sun. That if only 3% of Arizona's land was used for solar power, it could power the entire US.

    I'd like to find more realistic comparisons regardless with different alternatives. I just don't buy the premise that we're stuck with nuclear and oil/gas/coal.
  • cmdrogogov
    Solar (either reflector-based or photovoltaic) and wind have immense promise for our energy needs between them.

    Biofuels are pretty much a handout to farming cooperatives and seem to be a net energy-loss after everything is taken into account.

    Nuclear and gas would be useful for very demanding applications.. with Nuclear being preferred if regulations were more stringently enforced and corporations weren't so fundamentally bent as to take the kind of risks that result in disaster.

    Practical fusion power is way off, and getting further considering most nations have cut funding for projects such as ITER in response to the current economic depression.

    Ideally, the 'solution' to the looming peak oil/energy crisis will be a combination of more efficient technologies at the users' end, combined with a more sustainable and distributed model of energy production.
  • Guest
    Didn't Val Kilmer already invent fusion? Seriously though, you gave me a great idea. Once we've burned through all of the fossil fuels, we can burn all of the fossilized hippies. Not only will they provide us with power, the smell will be awesomely green.
  • Len_Drexler
    Elisabeth Shue invented fusion. Val Kilmer just stole it from her.
  • Guest
    That's right. My bad. She can create fusion with me any day.



    ________________________________
  • Len_Drexler
    Meanwhile Val Kilmer could power a small town with all the treadmill and exercise bike time he needs to be doing. Dude got fat.
  • Guest
    I think you just solved the energy crisis. Hook all of those machines in LA up
    to the power grid. It should power our nation, at least.



    ________________________________
  • chuzzlewit
    awesome - that remy guy is headed for scale/level 7!
    someone should put him and anne coulter in a room and film it. i'd watch that.
blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@gothamist.com