Provocateur Lawyer Losing War Against Ladies' Nights

Ladies, meet Roy Den Hollander. He's single...

Roy Den Hollander is losing the war against ladies' nights. The lawyer provocateur has spent the last three years filing class-action lawsuits, appeals and petitions fighting the systematic destruction of society caused by bars giving free or reduced admission to women on ladies’ nights. This week, he learned that the Supreme Court had refused to hear his case. “Of course, the three females on the court probably voted against it. Fighting for the rights of men is not very popular thing to do in America these days," he told the Times.

Yes, Hollander is not just fighting for himself, but for MAN. But the rabbit hole goes even deeper for this crusader, for you see, he believes the whole issue is predicated on the idea that feminism is actually a religion. “The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that religion is a belief system that occupies the same space in a person’s activities as a traditional religion like Catholicism or Protestantism - a system that dictates your ethical and moral standards and activities. The feminists have taken control over every institution in this country — they want to take control over men. I’m going to fight them to my last dollar, last breath.” One Judge who threw out the suit said that “feminism is no more a religion than physics.”

But dear friends, don't mistake his anti-feminist furor for misogyny. For if Hollander sees a hot piece of tail, he does not feel hatred: “When I go to a club and I’m looking at some young babe, I do not have malice in my heart. When some great looking 20-year-old babe is walking down the street, it is not malice in my heart that I’m feeling.” He added that he didn't want to reveal his age, lest it hurt his chances to pick up the aforementioned 20-year-old babes: “I want to continue to exploit the infinite capacity of females to delude themselves.” Ladies, you better grab this one fast before he's taken, because they certainly don't grow them like that anymore.

Contact the author of this article or email tips@gothamist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

By Ben Yakas in News on January 14, 2011 4:58 PM

Comments [rss]

my_beanus

The real question is "Why aren't feminists fighting Ladies' Night?" as Ladies Night exploits women as sex objects.

robingee

Maybe feminists believe that women can make their own choices. We won't say, "Stop ladies night, because women get drunk and go off to slam sleazy guys! They cannot control themselves! They are merely women!"

Rod

and it's practically a rape factory!

my_beanus

“I want to continue to exploit the infinite capacity of females to delude themselves.”

Goddamn, if he were a politician, I'd vote for him even though I've never voted before.

Trustafarian

"The feminists have taken control over every institution in this country — they want to take control over men. I’m going to fight them to my last dollar, last breath"

yeah - i'm sure feminists are thrilled at the premise of "ladies night" which is pretty much: attract cheap drunk chicks so guys can pick them up easier.

robingee

Ha! This guy is such a dickhead. Too funny.

"OOoo I hates feminists!"

felixthecat

maybe youngpoo is available?

felixthecat

He added that he didn't want to reveal his age, lest it hurt his chances to pick up the aforementioned 20-year-old babes, LOL, not his age but HIS FACE will hurt his chances. :D

Spirit of 76

Won't reveal his age? He must think people are incredibly stupid if he doesn't think we can guess he's somewhere around 47-52.

harrisgraber

This country has no shortage of idiots.

Rod

so you don't like equality?

you are right: no shortage of idiots.

Nati Rabinowitz

Ya it kinda pisses me off too. But hey, if it means ther'll be more ladies out because some guys wont pay that's aaite. But it's not very equal nonetheless.

Inconcievable de Impublishable

I'm against sexual discrimination. Equal pay should mean equal bar tabs. But still, this guy's a nutball.

Rod

no, he's totally right that it's sexual discrimination. ANY policy based on GENDER discrimination is illegal, including separate men and women's bathrooms. it's like having bathrooms for "whites" and "coloreds". but no one complains. that women OFFICIALLY get freebies for being born women is as illegal as "all-male" country cubs and things like that.

Inconcievable de Impublishable

Well, no, it's not illegal for a private establishment to have discriminatory rules. It's morally wrong to a great extent, but it's not illegal. It would be illegal if it were a government entity setting that policy, but it's private businesses, and on some level I can respect their business decision to have a policy that gets more people into their establishment. If it weren't profitable, they wouldn't do it.