Quantcast

See the Gross/Cartoonish New Cigarette Warning Labels

For those sad, outcast New Yorkers still determined to puff away inside their Government-designated smoking ghettos, there's more bad news. Smoking is deadly, and Obama doesn't want you to forget it. In the first major change to cigarette packaging since the Reagan-era, the FDA is requiring graphic warning labels that will cover half a package's front and back, and the top 20% of all cigarette ads. The administration is currently mulling over 36 different potential labels, which range from the cartoonish to the revolting. Here's a sample.

In June, the FDA will narrow down these options [pdf] to nine, and in September cigarette manufacturers must begin putting them on packages and advertising. Smoking rates nationwide have declined from about 42% in 1965 to just under 21% in 2004, but health officials are worried the rates have remained flat since then. "That's bad news," Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius told reporters. "Every day, 4,000 young people try cigarettes for the first time and 1,000 continue to smoke."

A local proposal to require cigarette retailers to post graphic warning signs at the cash register died on the vine. But the Bloomberg administration is still moving forward with a smoking ban in city parks, beaches, boardwalks, and pedestrian plazas. Correlation does not imply causation, but last year NYC reached its lowest rate of smoking on record (15.8%), with less than 1 million adult smokers in the city—350,000 fewer than in 2002.

And if you think these ads are gross, just be glad you don't smoke in Egypt, or Thailand, or New Zealand or Brazil! (You should also be glad you're not the intern we tasked with finding all those links during lunch hour.)

Contact the author of this article or email tips@gothamist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • Clarice City

    REally all they need is an image of some fat ass white trash smoking a butt by the dumpster of a Dave and Busters.

  • ANGRYGOD11

    If you're dumb enough to not believe sucking smoke into your lungs everyday for years or decades won't hurt you, then some cartoons aren't going educate you.

  • SonnyBobiche
  • Politburo

    This particular image seems like it might be counter-productive.. the takeaway message could be that it's OK to smoke around a kid, just don't blow the smoke in their face (duh, silly government).

    The 2nd to last one is also weird. Is that guy in a burning building?

  • hotstepper

    i like the one that shows burning yourself on the arm with a cigarette is a good way to overcome your addiction to nicotine. i think i'll go home and try it out.

  • RevWaldo

    Smoking Safety Tips for Dads:

    If you have a very young baby, we suggest you light the cigarette for him.

  • chuzzlewit

    i was clicking through these cynically wheezing with laughter until - i got to the puppet one.

    that's it man. i quit. i'm done.

  • FotoDogue

    They should've just used a photo of the smoking baby instead.

  • eetonaee
  • CaptainMXC

    Thanks for the link.

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@gothamist.com