Quantcast

New Trend Creeping Up Around Town: Finger Shoes!

fingershoes1010.jpg
Photo by Jenny Slate

You know those socks that look like mittens, with each toe getting its own little miniature sock? There is something creepy about those, which is probably why no one ever wears them. And now there's an even more disturbing creation: five finger shoes! And somehow this has infiltrated our city, our subway system, our elevators... our gyms.

Former SNL castmate Jenny Slate just spotted a pair underground, Tweeting: "HOW DARE YOU?! Those r NOT shoes! Especially not for the subway. Burn in hell. #fuckyoufuckyou4ever"—she included the above photo. With REI coming to town, this is going to get worse before it gets better.

Contact the author of this article or email tips@gothamist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • ShadowCat

    I can't believe it: something more hideous than flip flops.

  • gothamfaster

    I actually know a very attractive girl who started wearing these whenever she wasn't wearing manolo blahblah. I'm surprised they offend people more than dirty running shoes; now that I know they are the ultimate troll shoe, I might get some. Suckas.

  • La Flama Blanca

    Do these things pose a greater risk of injury in an urban environment? Anyone know? My fear with these: Sheared toes on the 6 train platform at Union Square.

  • k8trsgray

    J.J Casuals!!

  • r1b2

    If I see you wearing these near me, on the subway, on Smith Street (you pretentious sod), you are asking for a cockpunch.

  • Cannibal

    I think Cockpunch is the maker of these shoes.

  • rdsizzle

    "I'm a girl, and I'm referring to the reaction that my pussy has to these"

    Classy ... you sound adorable

  • Cannibal

    you do too, lets get married

  • madeleine25

    VFF's are not new. I've been wearing mine in the gym and on the subway for at least a year. I love them.

    You know what is gross? All of New York's mangled feet on display in sandals all summer long. Mangled and deformed from years of wearing pumps and dress shoes. Unlike standard footwear, VFF's won't mangle or deform your feet, and they are much better for your knees too.

    VFF's are ultra-comfortable, delightful and fun in everyway. The only thing they can't do are rain and puddles.

    I'd suggest trying on a pair of VFF's before hatin' on them. I got mine at City Sports. Once you switch to VFF's you will not want to go back to typical sneakers.

    And to Jenny Slate, you can kiss my well worn VFF's. :-)

  • soopahgrover

    OK, but if I can't wear my FiveFingers on the subway, please tell everyone in flip flops not to wear locker room shower footwear in the subway either. Thank you.

  • Potty Boy

    I finally found something that was not just barely, but infinitely uglier than crocs.

    How do I give it the middle finger?

  • cmdrogogov

    These shoes are designed for running over rough terrain, rock climbing and other applications where greater dexterity and sensitivity is desirable.

    They are NOT designed for day to day activities such as walking around a street or jogging in the park.

  • madeleine25

    I believe they were developed as a boat shoe for sailing. They gained popularity among runners, and now they are used for everything.

    Regardless of the activity in which one is engaged, VFF's are infinitely better for your feet, knees and back then traditional shoes.

  • Dogsbody

    Ok, so you're not saying people should actually NOT wear them for those everyday purposes, just that they're not necessarily designed for those purposes? I misunderstood.

  • Dogsbody

    "They are NOT designed for day to day activities such as walking around a street or jogging in the park."

    They may not be specifically designed for these purposes, but as far as I know they are more than suitable for such purposes. Are you implying that there is some kind of design issue which actually makes them inappropriate for these purposes, or simply suggesting that wearers have no "excuse" for wearing them for anything other than their intended purpose?

    If it's the former, I would like to know what it is, since I wear mine for general day-to-day wear, and I don't encounter any problems.

    If it's the latter, do you apply the same principle for anyone who wears sneakers for general day-to-day wear? Or people who wear rugged hiking boots such as Timberlands when they're not hiking?

    Also, I think running in the park is exactly the purpose they were made for.

    I'm curious as to why people seem to feel so strongly about this matter (40+ comments regarding someone's choice of footwear??). Are shoes with "toes" really that disgusting? My pants have individual "legs" for each leg, my sweater has sleeves for each arm, and my gloves have "fingers" for each finger...do these inspire the same reaction amongst everyone?

  • exnyer

    Makes me long for the days of the steel toe boot.

  • bashmentgirl

    The shoes look ridiculous.

  • ddhboy

    Whatever. Running shoes have had similar designs for years. Hell, there were a fantastic pair of Japanese ones I wanted back in '06. Gothamist is late to trends.

  • ANGRYGOD11

    The simple explanation for these shoes is the modern running shoe has weakened the foot and resulted in injuries largely unknown in cultures without such sneakers.

  • Nathaniel

    Thank you! It's true; these shoes taught me how to run correctly and have strengthened my feet as well. I wouldn't replace them for a moment.

    To be fair though, no one should be wearing these as a fashion statement.

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@gothamist.com