Quantcast

Could 15 Penn Plaza Be Successful Somewhere Else?

082310beekman.jpg
The Beekman, blocking a Brooklyn view of the Woolworth Bulding. (Flickr user Amazin' Jane)
As we mentioned before, a good 76% of New Yorkers apparently think building a 1,200 foot tower two blocks away from the Empire State Building would be detrimental to the New York City skyline. But as The Empire State Building Company's Times ad said, "There will be taller buildings in New York City...but they should merit the height with excellence." We took a look back at some recent New York history to one building that seems to be doing just that. The year was 2009, and Frank Ghery's 76-story Beekman Tower was causing quite a stir.

Developer Bruce Ratner almost had to stop the building at 38 stories due to the economy, but got the project back to its full height after negotiating with labor unions to save costs. And though the 867-foot tower is is changing the city's view of the iconic Woolworth Building (the city's tallest building from its construction in 1913 until 1930), it has not seen nearly as much criticism as 15 Penn Plaza has in just the past few days.

The NY Times' architecture review suggested why that may be the case, "A lesser architect might have spoiled one of the most fabled views in the Manhattan skyline. Instead Mr. Gehry has designed a landmark that will hold its own against the greatest skyscrapers of New York. It may even surpass them." Also near the Woolworth Building, developer Larry Silverstein announced he will be building an 80-story Four Seasons hotel at 99 Church Street, which Alliance of Downtown New York president Elizabeth Berger called one of the "reasons why Lower Manhattan is a global model for urban centers of the 21st century."

Developer Elie Hirschfeld, who sold The Hotel Pennsylvania to Vornado, is on the side of those who want to see that kind of support uptown. He said in a statement, "It brings me great sadness to see something that I have nurtured as well as a beloved New York City landmark go, but Vornado’s project will be a magnificent monument that will bring the city into the new millennium in such a way that only a great visionary like [Vornado Chairman of the Board] Steve Roth can." Which may be true, but perhaps it would be more beloved if it were further away from the hallowed ground of the Empire State Building.

Contact the author of this article or email tips@gothamist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • ianmac47

    There are few better places for a massive office tower than atop and adjacent to a major regional transportation hub. This tower is not going into a low rise residential neighborhood. Its not displacing residents. All this is really doing is obscuring New Jersey from the observation deck view.



    If the city isn't growing then the city is dying. If anything, this tower should be taller, a monument to the 21st century in the same way the Empire State building was a monument to the 20th.

  • jt10000

    Good point about the location.

  • squatch

    i think less people would be upset about this if the building wasn't so fugly.



    could they have designed a more boring structure?

  • F1Mikal



    Just build it north or south of ESB so it can BECOME and enhance part of the NY skyline.

  • gvarick

    Heh. THAT's what a lot of people think the Islamic center will look like. (feel like)

  • exnyer

    And now years later we can all say......Woolworth what`s a Woolworth? Good thing they built that building. Chrysler is next for extinction.

  • Stutter

    I blame Islamophobia.

  • MT

    So what's the excuse with Tower Verre now? Suddenly the arbitrary lopping off of 200' from that uber cool tower looks even more spiteful. It certainly fulfills the requirement of adding something new and powerful to the skyline.

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@gothamist.com