Quantcast

Poll: Will You Pay More To Keep Unlimited MetroCard?

Today the MTA released its 2011 Preliminary Budget and proposed Four-Year Financial Plan for 2011-2014. No surprises here; the plan includes all the different fare hike proposals that have been floated in the past couple of weeks. You can peruse the full financial plan in pdf form here. One of the more controversial proposals would kill the unlimited MetroCard, replacing it with a monthly card that maxes out at 90 rides for $99, and a weekly card that would have a limit of 22 rides for $28.

"It is inequitable to keep asking transit riders to contribute more to the system while drivers, who reap the congestion busting benefits of our transit system, can still travel into the densest city in America for free," said Kate Slevin, executive director of the Tri-State Transportation Campaign. "You can’t just blame the MTA. Elected officials who simply point fingers are dodging their responsibility to ensure our region’s transit service remains safe, affordable, and reliable. Voters angry about the recent service cuts, especially bus riders on Long Island, should ask candidates how they plan on dealing with the MTA’s financial crisis."

In September, there will be public yellings hearings on the plan, to be followed by the MTA implementing the changes regardless of what they "hear" from the public. More details about the proposed increases below, from the MTA press office:

The Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) today released its 2011 Preliminary Budget and proposed Four-Year Financial Plan for 2011-2014. The proposed plan reflects unprecedented internal cost cutting initiatives undertaken in response to a $900 million shortfall for 2010 resulting from cuts to State assistance and dramatic downturns in tax revenue. These shortfalls amount to more than $2.5 billion over the plan period. As a result of its cost-cutting actions, the MTA was able to limit the fare revenue increase to 7.5% in 2011, as agreed to with the Governor and Legislature in May 2009 as part of the MTA rescue package. The Plan faces many risks, however, including the need for labor participation to control wage and benefit costs. The July Plan is preliminary; the MTA Board will consider a final Plan in December.

The Plan relies on three key components. The first is the continuation and expansion of the MTA’s cost-cutting initiatives, which have saved more than $380 million in 2010, translating into more than $500 million in annual recurring savings and growing to more than $700 million by 2014. The second key to the Plan is controlling labor costs, which make up 2/3 of the MTA’s operating expenses. The Plan acknowledges that in the current economic situation wage increases must be tied to productivity gains or other cost savings. The Plan therefore assumes that all employees - both represented and non-represented - would receive a “net-zero” wage increase for two years. Finally, the Plan includes the 7.5% increases in fare and toll revenue in 2011 and 2013 agreed upon with the Governor and Legislature as part of the MTA rescue package approved last spring, which also included a series of new taxes to support the MTA and funding for the first two years of the MTA’s 2010-2014 Capital Program.

“The foundation of this Plan is the most aggressive and comprehensive overhaul in the history of the MTA,” said Jay H. Walder, Chairman and CEO of the MTA. “These actions have allowed us to hold true to our commitment regarding fare increases while maintaining the quantity and quality of service that New Yorkers rely on every day. The State’s ongoing fiscal crisis is one of many risks to the Plan, but with continued hard work and the participation of our labor unions I believe that this Plan can be achieved.”

The MTA was able to eliminate its 2010 deficit through a series of management actions, including:

· Eliminating more than 3,400 administrative and operating positions through layoffs, voluntary separations and elimination of vacant positions

· Freezing pay for management employees

· Increasing efficiency of paratransit and Bridge and Tunnel operations

· Reducing use of overtime

· Eliminating or deferring projects

· Consolidating functions

· Renegotiating contracts with vendors

· More efficiently managing inventories

These actions, the initial stages of a continuing effort to fundamentally overhaul the way the MTA does business, will mean recurring savings of more than $500 million in 2011, rising to $700 million in 2014.

Despite these savings, the Financial Plan remains subject to risks that could mean additional difficulties. The plan assumes that the health of the economy does not deteriorate significantly, and that the taxes that are collected by New York State in the MTA’s name are paid to the MTA. Regardless, additional reductions will need to be identified through labor savings, as noted, and through elimination of shortfalls to subsidies for Long Island Bus.

Labor

Controlling wage and benefit costs have a critical role to play in stabilizing the MTA’s finances. Wages, benefits and other personnel expenses account for 2/3 of MTA operating expenses. This financial plan assumes that each new labor contract will not impose any additional financial burden on the MTA for two years. This is intended as a clear statement that the MTA cannot afford to allow salary, wage and fringe benefit costs to rise in ways unconnected to productivity and the regional economy’s ability to support the system. This, however, does not preclude the possibility of wage increases based on bankable productivity improvements or contributions to benefit costs. Consistent with this “net zero” labor initiative, non-represented employees will not receive a cost of living raise in 2010, which will be the second of two consecutive years without an increase.

MTA Long Island Bus

The MTA proposed budget assumes that Nassau County will fully fund its obligation to support Long Island Bus. Under a 1973 lease agreement, the MTA operates the system as a contractor working on behalf of the County, which owns the bus system. Through 1999, the County made up 100% of its funding obligation. But since 2000, when the County dramatically cut back its assistance for this service, the MTA has been forced to shoulder an increasing share of this cost, totaling $140 million. The MTA can no longer afford to subsidize this service, which would cost the MTA more than $25 million in 2011.

Proposed Fare and Toll Increases

Fare policy is designed to raise the necessary revenue while maintaining ridership as much as possible, minimizing impacts to lower-income customers, and increasing efficiencies of fare collection. The proposal below will be discussed at public hearings in the fall before a final plan is taken to the MTA Board for approval. The fare increase would take effect on January 1, 2011.

“Today’s announcement begins a period of public discussion,” Chairman Walder said. “We look forward to hearing from the public and reviewing the public comments as we continue to evaluate this proposal before we adopt the final budget by the end of the year.”

New York City Subway & New York City Local Buses

Pay-Per-Ride MetroCards

· The base fare would remain unchanged at $2.25.

· The bonus discount offered on pay-per-ride MetroCards would fall to 7%, from the current 15%.

· Customers would need to put at least $10 on a MetroCard to receive the bonus, up from $8 currently.

· The effective fare paid by users of the pay-per-ride bonus discount MetroCard would rise to $2.10, from the current $1.96.

· The effective fare paid by express bus riders would rise to $5.14, up from $4.78 currently.


Unlimited Ride MetroCards


· For users of the 30-day unlimited-ride MetroCard, the MTA proposes to adopt one of two options:

A 30-day MetroCard offering up to 90 rides for $99.

A 30-day unlimited-ride MetroCard for $104.

Users of the 30-day unlimited card tend to have the highest incomes of all New York City Transit customers, and would continue to benefit from significant discounts on a per-ride basis as compared with pay-per-ride users. (A rider taking 90 rides in a month would pay $1.10 per ride under the $99 option, or $1.16 per ride under the $104 option.)

The median household income for users of the 30-day MetroCard is $63,000; for the 7-day card it is $38,000.

· For 7-day unlimited-ride MetroCards, the MTA proposes to adopt one of two options:

A 7-day card offering up to 22 rides for $28.

A 7-day unlimited-ride card for $29.

· In order to simplify options and retire ineffective discounts, the less popular one-day and 14-day MetroCards would be phased out.

The one-day Fun Pass is used for just 0.8% of subway and bus trips. The 14-day pass, is used for only 2.1% of trips. Proposed changes to the 7-day and 30-day MetroCards close the gap in per-ride cost, eliminating the need for the 14-day card.

Increasing Efficiencies

It costs 15 cents to collect every dollar the MTA collects in fare revenue. The MTA proposes two changes to help reduce this expense.


· To encourage customers to refill existing MetroCards instead of purchasing new ones, the MTA is proposing a charge of $1 to purchase a new MetroCard.

The MTA pays $13 million annually to print MetroCards, many of which wind up as litter.

This is a charge that any customer can avoid. It would not apply to those who refill an expired MetroCard by obtaining a new one, those who hold Reduced Fare passes, or to MetroCards sold at out-of-system retailers.

· Similarly, the MTA is proposing to institute a 25¢ charge for purchasing a paper single-ride ticket.


Long Island Rail Road & Metro-North Railroad


· Average ticket increases range from 7.6% to 9.4%, depending on distance and ticket type, in order to achieve a revenue gain of 7.5%.

· Most discounts for tickets purchased via the Mail & Ride and WebTicket programs would be eliminated.

Sales through these programs cost the MTA up to seven times more per ticket than sales through Ticket Vending Machines.

The discount for the joint Mail& Ride monthly ticket/MetroCard would be retained, but reduced.

· To help limit the size of the fare increase, the MTA is proposing to reduce ticket validity periods in ways that conform with policies of numerous peer railroads.

. A one-way ticket would be valid for seven days (down from the current six months).

. A ten-trip ticket would be valid for 90 days (down from the current one year).

· To speed up on-board fare collection processes, the cost of tickets purchased on board would be rounded up to the nearest dollar.

· The railroads would institute a fee to cover the cost of processing refunds.

MTA Bridges and Tunnels

· Cash tolls at the MTA’s six major crossings and the Henry Hudson Bridge would increase by 50¢, and cash tolls at its two minor bridges would rise by 25¢.

· The MTA proposes to increase E-ZPass tolls for cars by 10% at all crossings.

· Resident discount programs increase proportionally.

Contact the author of this article or email tips@gothamist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • dcs123

    Everyone keeps complaining about the cost of public transportation in this city and I don't know why. New York City has one of the most comprehensive public transportations systems in the world (in my opinion 10x better than any other I have used) Of course there are flaws, as with any public service, but even with the recent cuts and cost increase, I am overall satisfied. Paying $99 or even $104 per month, while being prohibitive to those in tight financial spots, is a GREAT deal when you think of it compared to the monthly cost of purchasing and operating a vehicle. My personal theory is - if you want to live in one of the best (and most expensive) cities in the WORLD, be prepared to pay the price...

  • Duffy

    I think the problem most of us have is that the price keeps rising while the service keeps deteriorating.



    I understand your point that our subway system is one of the most comprehensive in the world, but if you've ridden on some of the other top systems (Tokyo, London, Hong Kong, Paris) you'll notice that comparatively, we live in a crumbling, rat infested shit hole.



    I've noticed since the most recent service cuts that it takes me at least 10 minutes more to get to work. That means, generally, waiting even longer on stiflingly hot platforms for an overcrowded train to arrive. What are these fare increases going to buy us?

  • dcs123

    They are buying us continued service!! (due to the budgeting incompetence of the NY State Government, and in part the past poor financial management of the MTA.) Without fare increases there would be even MORE cuts... if you follow the news you have heard they have already cut hundreds of jobs reducing security in stations due to budget shortfalls and that's a shame...Tough times call for tough measures...I'd rather have slightly slower service than no or severely limited service...So basically my point is...the increases and service cuts all go towards keeping the system running at all and hopefully in better times more service will be restored. It's possible I'm being really foolish and naive to think this but only time will tell!

  • Stevennnn

    Problem is they're going after the lower level people! How can one expect to cut their own? Top level people in suits.

  • NewHCE

    This would undermine the beauty of the "unlimited" card. Sometimes when I am a few blocks away from my destination, a bus will going in my direction will happen to stop. So I jump on and ride it a few blocks...which I would not do if I had to pay for the trip.

  • nurserachet

    That's bullshit about the most wealthy riders buying the monthly, wtf are they talking about??



    If they do implement the 90 ride cap, then just forget the 30 limit. I'd be almost ok with 90 rides for $99 if it just worked for those 90 days no matter how long it took me to use. It's just buying in bulk.



    I would prefer totally unlimited though. When I'm in school some days I take the subway like 6 or 7 times. A 90 trip limit would last like 2.5 weeks for me.

  • nurserachet

    oops. ok so up there i mean 30 day limit, and then "worked for 90 RIDES" you know what i mean.

  • Give me some dang congestion pricing. New York State acts towards New York City like townies to a college town. Newsflash: your state is basically an appendix on our city.

  • Stevennnn

    Why don't we New Yorkers bring the MTA system to a stop? Nobody should pay the fares on January 1 and the days after that. If there are millions upon millions in the streets and tunnels the NYPD and national guard cannot do anything.

  • victoria

    I agree, Steven. It is hard to understand why more New Yorkers don't boycott the MTA, though I guess everyone has their reasons. However, it is our right to demand affordable service for PUBLIC transportation and if people are angry, complaining won't create change - action will. I ride my bike to work as much as possible and plan to boycott the MTA fare hike by not riding the train or bus after the fare hike.

  • Your solution is...riots?

  • Stevennnn

    Talking and peaceful solution seem not to work for the MTA or politicians. Riots and violence are the worst but what other choices are there????



    Do you think the MTA will change anything from the public input during public hearings?

  • Såkandulæredet

    Tired of the boys in blue running up on your crew, you know what to do, tell 'em fuck you! It's a proposition, fuck you, fuck you it's a proposition.



    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vwoAxuZYclo

  • Dick Nickel

    Users of the 30-day unlimited card tend to have the highest incomes of all New York City Transit customers...



    Bull-fucking-shit.



    I hate the MTA.

  • gothamguy

    No, the people that use the unlimited cards are the ones who have 2 jobs, or 1 job and school, or a job that requires them to travel around (delivery, etc.) and don't just go to and from one location.



    They need to keep an unlimited option. $105 sucks, but it is better than the $99 version.



    They also better make the unlimited card refillable, or the price is actually $1 higher because you will be getting a new card every month.

  • Victrola

    According to this article, labor make up 2/3 of the MTA's operating costs. And according to

    this
    , a Transport Workers Union representative says freezing raises for MTA workers for the next two years, in an effort to help the MTA's massive budget problems, is out of the question.

    So, freezing spending in the largest sector of the MTA budget is simply not an option?

  • Victrola

    You're right.

    The reason 30-day unlimited users have the highest income relative to other MTA passengers is because "low-income" riders can't afford the one-time cost of unlimited metrocards.

    Some pay-per-ride users would prefer the $89 30-day unlimited, but the cost is prohibitively high for a single purchase.



    $89, is simply too much money for some people to scrape together at once.

  • MidC Frank

    Puh-leeze -- I never buy this argument. Poor folk all around thre country scrape together money for monthly car payments, insurance, et al.

  • Victrola

    Yes, and there are poor folk all around the country who cannot do those things.

    You'll notice I said $89 is too much money for some people.

  • ASSTACKLER

    Bastards, regressive taxation at its finest.

  • Guest

    There should be a third choice: Fuck the MTA!

  • Jen S

    I'd vote for that twice.

  • TrippinJoJo

    what's the point of having public hearings if the MTA is deaf?

  • Stevennnn

    Just soaking it to the public. Ten Trips now valid for 90 days? What a joke. The MTA needs to be stopped.

  • eric l

    How come no mention that Bloomberg appoints much of the MTA board? Blaming the MTA is about as intelligent as blaming "ABC", "LMNOP", or "XYZ".

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@gothamist.com