Quantcast

MTA May Cut Fun Pass, Raise Monthly Metrocard $10-15

072710nofun.jpg The time has come to put away touristy things: tomorrow the full MTA board will propose the elimination of the one day "Fun Pass" MetroCard, which was introduced as a boon for tourists back in 1998. But the passport to fun has been abused by subway scammers, who use it to sell discounted $2 swipes to commuters. The MTA is also expected to scrap the 14-day unlimited MetroCard, which is only used by 2% of commuters. On the plus side, there's now a chance that the weekly and monthly unlimited MetroCards will survive without limitations, albeit at a higher cost.

The MTA is reportedly considering two options for the Unlimited MetroCards: For the weekly, a fare increase from $27 to $28, with a 22-trip limit on rides; or an increase to $29, with no limit. For the monthly, the MTA will consider either a fare increase from $89 to $99 with a 90-trip limit; or a significant increase to $104, with no limit. In addition, the pay-per-ride bonus will be slashed from 15 percent to seven percent. Also on the table: 50 cent increases tolls for major bridges and tunnels, as well as cuts to the "off peak" discounts on the LIRR.

Second Avenue Sagas notes that by 2011, the fare hikes will have outstripped inflation by nearly 25 percent since Unlimited MetroCards were introduced in 1998. To push back, Paul Steely White of Transportation Alternatives is leading a "Riders' Rebellion" campaign to fight the fare hikes in Albany. "We will be asking riders to sign a riders' bill of rights," White tells NY1. "This bill of rights outlines exactly what the state should be doing for the region's eight million subway and bus riders—affordable fares, clean safe, accessible stations. These are the types of things that riders should be getting for their fare money and they're not."

"The villain here is not the MTA," says Gene Russianoff of the Straphangers Campaign. "In many ways they are as much the victim as the riders are. They had $143 million cut from their budget and, as a result, their customers were hit with the worst service cuts in decades. So asking the riders to pay more for less is wrong, but it's not the MTA's fault." You can watch tomorrow's MTA board debate live online here. After laying out the options, the MTA will hold public hearings in September and then make a final decision about the various plans.

Contact the author of this article or email tips@gothamist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • Revolve

    Regardless of how much the MTA keeps raising fares, it will never fully solve the budget problem – the MTA has been fighting their deficit for years and in today’s economy, the problem has only gotten worse. Commuters are definitely starting to move towards biking and electric bikes, but I agree with many of the comments above regarding storage. Unfortunately very few buildings, streets and parks in NYC have bike racks or anywhere you can safely tie your bike to, but hopefully with the increase bike commuters, this will change, in the interim, looks like we’re tying our bike locks to poles/street signs.

  • Art Vandelay

    Again, congestion pricing would solve this problem once and for all. Look at the transportation system as a whole -- cars carry a vocal minority who exert a disproportionate impact on the rest of us.

  • TKaisen

    Again, congestion pricing would solve this problem once and for all.



    No, it wouldn't. It would overcrowd already crowded subway lines.

  • Stevennnn

    Once again more money for the MTA is not the answer. They are a very inefficient wasteful government agency. Does anyone actually think ALL of the $$ from congestion pricing will go straight to the MTA or more to the pockets of polticans and earmarks?



    The MTA problems are much more deeper.

  • Gepap

    While it is correct that the MTA has been wasteful, the largest single long term financial issue they face is their massive debt load (and concurrent interest payments) and that debt load exists because the capital program of the MTA has been severely neglected and underfunded for decades, and that IS a funding issue. In this state (and in the country in general) transportation funds are not fairly distributed, with low density areas getting more money than high density areas in transportation funds.



    The City should introduce congestion pricing (and not only for Manhattan) and use the money to better fund the MTA capital program, including the upgrading and improvement of bus service to the outer boroughs.

  • rdayk

    Schoolkids shouldn't have to pay for their Metrocards - it's just ridiculous to propose slashing that program. Transportation to and from public school is necessary and if the city can't provide bussing, they have to provide free Metrocards. What should be slashed is free health insurance for MTA employees. Everyone else has to kick in for their health insurance, why should MTA employees get it for free? And the retirement age of MTA employees should be changed to be more in line with the norm. Why should they get to retire at 55 when most of us will have to work till 67 or 72? MTA should start by trimming some of the fat from employee benefits (average MTA salary is $50K - for jobs that don't require anything but a HS diploma) before they consider raising fares. Of course the union would rather pass on the cost to New Yorkers than eliminate these cushy MTA benefits.

  • ketty

    instead of talkin or complainin about it...i say that we should just plan something such as a boycott ..because i refuse to spend mpre for less service..i barely can afford the fare now...as always they dont really care about riders so they will do anything bcuz they knw we depend on it...sooo i say we should start a boycott if this proposal go thru

  • ketty

    i agree ..i say we all walk or bike it to work or wherever the destination.

  • Knickerbocker

    Just cut all discounts and unlimited passes.



    It just increases maintenance costs while decreasing revenue.



    Why is there a discount anyway? You are going to ride the train one way or another.



    Oh, and get rid of the useless 'improvement projects' like countdown clocks and the 2nd Ave subway. Stop expanding, and start maintaining.

  • TKaisen

    Oh, and get rid of the useless 'improvement projects' like countdown clocks and the 2nd Ave subway.



    The 2nd Ave Subway is only useless if you don't ride the 4/5 in the morning. For those of us who do, it's a known necessity.



    As for the countdown clocks, I think they should be outside the station, but they're far from useless.

  • ANGRYGOD11

    As easy as it is to mock tourists, they are important to our city's economy. They need the Fun Pass and we need to compete with other cities for their business.

  • Knickerbocker

    While I have no way of proving this, I really doubt people choose New York over other cities just because we have a 'fun pass'.



    If saving $10/day is so important to any tourists, then they probably can't afford NYC to begin with.

  • ANGRYGOD11

    Its not just the money, its the convenience of getting around an unfamiliar place without restrictions. I've been to many other cities where an unlimited pass makes exploring a worthwhile adventure.

  • ANGRYGOD11

    As easy as it is to mock tourists, they are important to our city's economy. They need the Fun Pass and we need to compete with other cities for their business.

  • ANGRYGOD11

    The Second Ave line isn't useless. It's going to relieve the over-congested Lexington line, which carries more people per day than some entire subway systems in other cities. Why do you think it's been on the proposal list for over two generations?

  • Stevennnn

    The pay per ride discount is virtually gone. From 20% to 7%...



    Did Gothamist forget Metro-North is part of the MTA?

  • wingedearth

    Instead of raising the price of MTA cards, why not just stop giving out free MTA cards to kids and charge everyone?

  • janelle

    *reasonably* raise the cost of unlimited metrocards (but no limits! that makes no sense!)

    higher/more tolls for automobile drivers polluting our city (i occasionally drive!)

    streamline MTA management to reduce costs

    improve bike safety in NYC to encourage biking (i'm terrified of it!)

  • jibbly

    Unlimited or bust, MTA.

  • TrippinJoJo

    I agree that those who use the cabs should pay way more for the "luxury" of using a car to get to their destinations.



    But I don't agree with increasing the fares and removing/cutting back on services AND filthy conditions of stations.



    At the same time people are frustrated because this all looks like the MTA is raping our wallets to fix their mistakes. The more I read about these stories and see what this city is turning into, I hesitate to say "I love NY". Because NY doesn't love me or you. NY loves our $. that's it.



    And doucheberg is slowly turning this city into a haven for the rich. He's basically saying "Fuck you" to everyone who can't afford his bullshit.

    ok im done.

  • barryap

    If they eliminate the fun pass to get people to stop selling swipes, wouldn't the scammers just buy monthlies and use those?

  • Alex S

    No one agrees with this. But we have to pay more. There's a budget gap, and it's just not practical to get mad and refuse to pay more.



    If I lived in a suburban area, I'd probably pay $500/month for a car. $104 for all of my transit is a bargain, especially since I get my pass with pre-tax dollars through my employer.



    We can't continue to let them chop lines off of the system. It's becoming hellish to ride the thing, too. We have to keep it usable and useful. If we don't, our quality of life will go down the tubes.



    And we need to keep the outer boroughs stitched into the fabric of the city -- we can't create a situation where people don't leave their borough on weekends, because transit service sucks so hard.



    They need to figure out a way to protect people who are really hard up. They shouldn't be talking about taking away passes for school kids, for example. There are plenty of people who should get assistance.



    But people who have jobs, who go out to eat, who ride a cab when waiting for the train or bus would be a drag -- those folks should cough up the extra $20/month and shut up about it.



    This is such an expensive city, the sums involved are really not that large, and ruining the system makes all of our lives miserable.



    We need to cough up the dough and just deal with it.

  • Stevennnn

    It's hard to comparing owning a car in the suburb vs taking public transportation in the city. Having a car means freedom and having your own schedule. Be able to visit other states or taking trips.



    Insurance rates are cheaper in suburbs, no parking meter fees, less tickets, more highway miles which is better for a car.

  • grandeur

    Exactly, the train doesn't always run... and for times like those I always take a cab.



    That goes for large grocery shopping, shopping for the apt, and late nights. Not to



    mention carrying equipment for work.



    And what about traveling out of the area by train? All together it probably adds up.

  • str1cken

    CONGESTION PRICING TO COVER THE BUDGET GAP.



    In a city of 8 million people, personal vehicles are an outrageous luxury, and the use thereof should subsidize the people who are being more socially and environmentally responsible.

  • THANK YOU. YES.

  • kazubes

    Charge by distance, I dont see why I should pay the same fare to go 1 stop as someone commuting 15+ stops in

  • kfarrel3

    How is that fair? I commute every day from Queens, at the very end of the E line, because I don't make enough money to live in the city. But I should be charged even more every month because I don't have the luxury of working close to home?

  • whitecastlerock

    why don't you walk then?

  • Phillip

    Because in NYC that's regressive pricing. The core workforce has to commute to Manhattan where the rich people live.

  • TKaisen

    Because in NYC that's regressive pricing. The core workforce has to commute to Manhattan where the rich people live.



    So are cigarette, soda, and sales tax. Zoned fares work in nearly every other city that has a subway system. Living on the outskirts of the city means you're paying way less for pretty much everything. You can pay a little more for the convenience of transit.

  • Oh man seeing reasonable people on Gothamist makes me inappropriately excited. Look ma! Somebody is making sense!

  • TheKlaus

    speaking of mta, wtf was up with the L today? sat on the l train for 45 minutes and didn't move

  • Sir Bonkers

    ride a bike

  • Phillip

    I rode a bike last summer about 15 miles each way between Manhattan and Bayside. I enjoyed it, but my biggest problems with bike commuting is safe storage.



    I don't want to be forced to carry around a 10-pound Kryptonite lock everywhere I go and American culture doesn't give a shit about other people's property. If bikes were more like cars, where they could somehow be safely "parked" and bike theft were treated seriously, that'd be great. Sure, you could just buy $50 junker bikes, but I don't want to ride those, they suck, and my $500 bike is a theft target then.

  • silver

    Have fun in the blizzard and baking heat while dodging taxis and muggers, i'll be relaxing in the subway car.

  • Phillip

    My bike commute was quicker and was great exercise. I think you'd be more likely to be mugged on the train or platform as a stationary target rather than on a moving bike.

  • tmz is evil

    "Have fun in the blizzard and baking heat while dodging taxis and muggers, i'll be relaxing in the subway car."

    ---



    Have fun taking three extra trains and a shuttle on the weekends due to disrupted service, dealing with beggars, getting food spilled on you by disgusting noshers, having to deal with sermons from screechy born again Christians, mentally practicing how to escape a subway car in the event that a dispute breaks out between two knife-wielding thugs, and being the victim of the inevitable subway terrorist bombing.

  • Kojak

    This fiendish plot is obviously the work of Critical Mass, which wants citizens to abandon Mass Transit for bicycles.

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@gothamist.com