Quantcast

Wall Street Journal Unveils "Greater New York" Section

2010_04_gny.jpg
The online homepage for the Wall Street Journal's Greater New York section above; the first page of the print section below

2010_04_wsjny.jpg The Wall Street Journal's "NY Times-killing" New York section launched today. Online, the "Greater New York" offering has a mix of free and paywall articles. For instance, the lead story, about subway bomb plotter Najibullah Zazi getting waved through the George Washington Bridge checkpoint by Port Authority cops, is free, but the story on NY State considering emergency borrowing is subscriber content. And the WSJ apparently thinks its readers take the subway but are confounded by Metrocard swiping, hence an article on Metrocard swiping (free).

There's also an article about the Giants' and Jets' Meadowlands coexistence (free), bad old day worries with killings in Harlem (free) and auction house Christie's new Red Hook storage facility (paywall). The GNY homepage also has selections from their "Metropolis" blog—yes, the American Girl Cafe was struck by a nasty norovirus.

Daily Intel examined the section, too, "And though we knew the paper was going after the Times' swishy Upper East Side readers, we wouldn't have guessed it would pander so directly, with stories like 'Rats Mob the Upper East Side.'" As for advertising, Reuters says that local businesses were offered full page ads for the bargain basement price of $19,000 (list rate for WSJ is more like $90,000-100,000, though discounts can apply for different advertisers) and maybe even a free full page ad in the Post: " Dow Jones source, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said only a few New York area businesses not currently advertising in the Wall Street Journal or the New York Post were being offered the discount."

Poynter has the memo that NY Times publisher Arthur Sulzberger and president Janet Robinson sent to staffers:

So as our welcome gift to New York, we pass on a few helpful hints to our Journal colleagues: the Dodgers now play in Los Angeles, Soho is the acronym for South of Houston, Fashion Week has moved to Lincoln Center, Idlewild is now JFK and Cats is no longer playing on Broadway.
If you happen to know anyone who works for the Journal's new section and he or she wants any additional information about the greater New York region, tell them to check out NYTimes.com's always very helpful archive.

Contact the author of this article or email tips@gothamist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • used_up_shoe

    "Greater New York", an article about the UES, and an accusatory headline. I wonder if Murdoch is targeting conservative rich people?

  • xgeyiph772

    The Upper East Side, the Upper West Side, and Park Slope. As far as the WSJ (and the NYT) is conserned, the rest of the city is for philistines who drive cars and read The Daily News.

  • xgeyiph772

    Conserned? Try "concerned." Thank you PS 18!

  • Stevennnn

    What do they mean "greater" New York? Just New York City or NYC and its suburbs?

  • NannyState

    Suddenly the Village Voice seems relevant again.

  • Sha

    It is hard to read the WSJ these days with Murdoch running it (e.g., how is "Annoying Orange" making the front page????), but I'm optimistic on the New York section.



    Just a bit.



    Ugh, who am I kidding...

  • FelixtheCat & Christine Quinn'

    it looks like a combination of the NY Post and the Observer. Wouldn't give Murdoch one penny. I cancelled my Barrons subscription after he took over it. It isn't any longer independent trust worthy research to relied on.

  • xgeyiph772

    NYT killing? As if The Times (and most other newspapers in the US) haven't been going thru their death throes for years now. Why read either paper when we got Gothamist?!

  • RevWaldo

    Hmmm... a somewhat-softball-for-Gothamist post on WSJs new section, surrounded by banner ads for the same section. Coincidence?

  • Trilby16

    Cool! I am still mad at the Times for dropping the Metro section. Maybe I should switch over to the WSJ... Naw, I get a huge discount on my Times subscription.

  • Kojak

    The Times still has a good NY/Region section, but I have been reading the WSJ Metro piece and its ok. Just Ok



    But every time I turn it over to the Op-Ed piece, it fills me with rage.

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@gothamist.com