I doubt the geriatrics will win the superbowl again. Let's Go Mets!!!!!

Here's an even better link than that "Everbright smiles" site: a record of deceptive credit card charges and other complaints about that company:

http://www.complaintsboard.com/complaints/everbright-smilesprestinehealth-c288042.html

I was going to ask what the hell you're talking about, but then I realized that you were just spamming so you could post a link to your site.

"when he came up with runners on in the 7th, Girardi held up four fingers to issue the intentional walk. But after one pitch he decided to change his mind and the result was predictable- a three-run homer."

Facile oversimplification. What really happened: Girardi called for the IBB. First pitch went that way. Then he changed his mind... which is odd, but what's odd about it isn't that the call was taken off but that it was ever made in the first place. First base wasn't open (runners were on first and second), it was the original call for an intentional walk that was questionable, not the revised call to pitch to Morales.

The next two pitches were balls, but unintentional. With a 3-0 count, Morales got what most hitters get in that situation: a fastball down the middle. Usually a batter is told to simply take that pitch looking for a walk (in this case, loading the bases), which is why 95% they see exactly the batting-practice pitch that was seen here -- but Morales this time had the green light to swing... and crushed it for a home run.

You can not even pretend that had Girardi called for an intentional walk at 3-0, advancing the runners and loading the bases, people wouldn't be second guessing that call. That, you know if you actually do know anything about baseball, is not done in the majors. Ever. By anyone.