Quantcast

S.E.C Lawsuit, Stock Plunge Won't Stop Big Bonuses at Goldman

041910sachs.jpg In January 2007, Fabrice Tourre, the French trader accused of defrauding Goldman Sachs' investors by selling them mortgage-backed bonds he believed would fail, wrote the following in an email to a friend: "The whole building is about to collapse anytime now... Only potential survivor, the fabulous Fab... standing in the middle of all these complex, highly leveraged, exotic trades he created without necessarily understanding all of the implications of those monstrosities!!!" Fab's investors lost a billion dollars during the housing market collapse, but Goldman Sachs and client John Paulson, a hedge fund manager who helped package the bad bonds, cashed in. Now, in an apparent attempt to trademark the word "hubris," the bank intends to pay $5 billion in bonuses, on par with what they paid back in 2007.

British Prime Minister Gordon Brown blasted Goldman yesterday, telling the BBC, "I am shocked at this moral bankruptcy. This is probably one of the worst cases that we have seen." Brown is calling for a "special investigation" into Goldman in cooperation with the S.E.C., which filed a civil lawsuit on Friday against the bank. The lawsuit, which only names Tourre, accuses Goldman of selling subprime mortgage bonds to investors that they thought might default, while also buying insurance on them, thereby profiting when the bonds plunged and defaults spread.

The intensifying outrage about the SEC allegations comes as President Obama pushes legislation that would force banks to be more transparent about the sale of complex derivatives. (Obama will visit Wall Street on Thursday.) Many Republicans have vowed to fight the bill, but yesterday Senator John McCain, during an appearance on Fox News Sunday, said, "When we find out that Goldman Sachs was betting against its own investors and, you know, playing the double game—and I'm sure we're going to find out they weren't the only ones—look, things have got to change in the way that they do business."

32,500 Goldman Sachs employees worldwide will received the bonuses, with a handful of top traders expected to be in line for multi-million-dollar bonuses, the Sunday Times reports. Meanwhile, the bank's stock plummeted 13% in the wake of the S.E.C. lawsuit on Friday. Adding insult to injury, Goldman Sachs knew nine months ago that it was a target of federal regulators, but didn't disclose it to stockholders, who have lost as much as $12 billion. Under S.E.C. rules, Goldman was under no obligation to disclose the subpoena, because information about legal proceedings doesn't have to be made public if the amount involved doesn't exceed 10 percent of a firm's assets. "It's a horrendous rule . . . a joke," one former SEC official told The Post.

Contact the author of this article or email tips@gothamist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • FelixtheCat & Christine Quinn'

    Perhpas Greece, AIG shareholders and all the others that GS screwed can get together and Sell GS Short.

  • JacqueMehoff

    was someone watching BookTV last night?

  • ides_of_march

    If the economic illiterates in the Obama administration want to put an end to Wall St shenanigans, how about letting the bastards go bankrupt when they fail instead of rewarding them with tax dollars? Just a thought from someone who didn't go to Harvard business school.

  • Politburo

    Lehman.

  • fuboy

    Lehman had fallen apart and sold most of it's assets before November 2008. Obama didn't let it fall, Bush did.

    Although, the first bail-out did come from Bush, and Obama continued the poor practice.

  • Politburo

    My point was that we saw what happened when large firms were allowed to fail. I did not intend to imply that Obama had done so personally.

    And let's not forget what happened when the first bailout bill failed.

  • fuboy

    Ah, gotcha, I just wanted to make sure we were all on the same page time-line-wise.

    And to point out that Bush was the first to help bail out problem companies, so solely blaming a democratic administration isn't a fair assessment.

  • Politburo

    And as a reminder, since some are trying to revise history, over 100 Republicans voted for the bailout and it was signed by President Bush.

  • Chase

    As a reminder, not everyone that disagrees with Obama supported the previous administration or even supports the other party.

  • Politburo

    I don't believe I said anything that is in conflict with your comment.

  • NYDirk

    Pat Buchanan has been warning us about Goldman Sachs for 15 years.

  • boomshanka

    yeah, but he hates jews

  • boomshanka

    So the fabulous fab is the scapegoat, goldman takes a small hit and then gets to write the new finance reform bill.

  • bubka

    Yep. Trying to play it off as if Fab worked alone, and Goldman had no oversight wrt these transactions. Complete BS. They didn't disclose a material risk factor, and they should pay heavy fines for this.

    That said, this shouldn't have any connection to bonuses (except Fab's), its a completely different issue. Enough with the "Goldman pays big bonuses" stuff already.

  • boomshanka

    i definitely think that goldman rigs the game, and that these bonuses are the rewards for behavior that should be illegal but isn't.

  • Politburo

    I'm not a fan of the bonuses, but they've repaid TARP and I don't see how the actions of 3 years ago by certain individuals relate to the company's or certain individuals' performance in 2009.

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@gothamist.com