Quantcast

Lehman Brothers "Alter Ego" Revealed!

041310captainamerica.jpg You may think these big, sinister banks who brought down the economy are the apogee of evil, but it's now been revealed that many of these lawless, rampaging Hulks actually have "alter egos" they use for their really shady stuff. That's how one former trader for Lehman Brothers trader described the firm's relationship with a mysterious, shadowy company called Hudson Castle. According to the Times, its awesome superpowers included lending money to Lehman, reducing Lehman’s "moral obligation" to support its off-balance sheet vehicles, and protecting Lehman from "headline risk" if any of its deals went sideways. Worked like a charm! Oh, right, actually it didn't. But alter egos are still perfectly legal!

Lehman and other banks use these alter egos to temporarily transfer their exposure to risky investments, such as those subprime mortgages that helped ruin us. In Lehman's case, Hudson Castle was controlled by Lehman's board and staffed by former Lehman employees, but its role in the company was never disclosed to shareholders. Sometimes Lehman used Hudson Castle to undertake transactions totaling $1 billion. The Times describes Lehman's alter ego as part of "a vast financial system that operates in the shadows of Wall Street, largely beyond the reach of banking regulators."

"Everybody’s talking about preventing the next crisis, but they can’t prevent the next crisis if they don’t understand all these incestuous relationships," says accounting consultant Francine McKenna. Great, now Obama's probably going to ram an anti-insect bill down Congress's throat. But look, "there were no bad intentions around any of this stuff," insists one reassuring former Lehman employee who is probably married to his sister.

Nevertheless, questions linger about the alter ego's alter ego: Hudson Castle created a "legal entity" called Fenway, which lent money to Lehman as the firm fell apart. But the elaborate ruse collapsed when Lehman tried to pledge its Fenway bank notes to JPMorgan as collateral for other loans. And they would have gotten away with it too—if it weren't for those meddling JP Morgan analysts, who "concluded that Fenway was worth practically nothing."

Contact the author of this article or email tips@gothamist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • Guest

    Did you get Marvel's permission to use that pic?

  • Helen Thomas knows the score

    funny story Jack Kirby who did invent cpt america got proabably got 5-20 bucks for it. that was in 1940.

    he would be in the public domain now, except for our corporate congress extending copyright back in the 90s. when the country was founded copy right was somthing like 10 years. now its something like 125 years. 125 years. Crazy. fck marvel and their lawyers.

    the whole character is made up a public domain flag anyway.

  • Guest

    No, Captain America would not be in our public domain now because Marvel can renew that copyright each and every time it lapses. That is their right as sole publisher. Just because his costume is taken from the flag doesn't mean it should be public domain either. Anyway, why so bitter? Did Marvel reject a submission from you or did you infringe on one of their characters in some way?

  • Truth-Seeker#922334

    There it is!!

    Second to last paragraph!

    Who knew? Yes, Obama is anti-insect!!!

    Scream it from tall buidings! Watch out, you ants!

    Obama will find you!

  • VorneliusCanderbilt

    But you already knew this. He DID swat that fly during that CNBC interview.

  • BDS=(Boycott.Divest.Sanction)

    its fantastic system we have here.

    create entities with some simple paperwork. create fantasmogorical wealth on paper, then disavow all the liablity when the charade comes tumbling down...

    meanwhile all the individuals involved walk away with tons of profit.

    what a fantastic system. god bless america.

    and all you peons who critizise any of this are just lazy socialists looking for a handout.

    http://discuss.epluribusmedia.net/node/3674

    "The wealthiest 1 per cent of the population has raised its share of the returns to wealth – dividends, interest, rent and capital gains – from 37 per cent of the total ten years ago to 57 per cent five years ago, and an estimated 70 per cent today. Over two-thirds of the returns to wealth now go to the wealthiest 1 per cent of the population. This is the highest on record. We are approaching Russian kleptocratic levels."

  • The Red Pen

    Hudson Terrace or Hudson Castle?

  • VorneliusCanderbilt

    Better than their original alter ego, "Robbin." (rimshot)

  • MFer

    Hudson Terrace? Where that come from?

  • Eugene

    So, when do the public executions begin?

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@gothamist.com