Quantcast

Naked Guy Joins Naked Gal in Village Gallery Window

2010_03_naked.jpg You may recall that last month an exhibit at a small West Village gallery was shut down by the NYPD because the show featured a nude woman standing in the gallery window. (She was holding a jar of human testicles, by the way, but more on that later.) The NYCLU and famed civil rights lawyer Ron Kuby rallied to the gallery's defense, arguing that a state law on public nudity has an exception for "the breast-feeding of infants or to any person entertaining or performing in a play, exhibition, show or entertainment." In a surprise move, the NYPD agreed, and declared that the model, Megan Hanford, is an integral part of the artwork, and there's nothing lewd or indecent about it. Emboldened, the gallery is now kicking it up a notch!

Yesterday the artist, Brian Reed, joined Hanford in the window of the Chair and the Maiden gallery. (The jar of testicles was set aside, since they were no longer necessary to "balance the female energy.") Curator David Zell tells us that Reed had been getting a lot of hate mail accusing him of objectifying women, with some critics wondering why he wasn't up there exposing himself. So he decided to do just that (and he'll be back next Thursday, in case you missed it). We asked Zell about those who object to the exhibit, particularly families who say they have no warning about what they're about to walk past, and no choice about keeping it from their children. He said:

Choice goes both ways. They have a choice to not walk by and not look in. I'm on a small street; it's not a main boulevard. And once could argue that the state of New York is infringing on my choice if we were prohibited from displaying this. Everyone has to have choice in order for it to be balanced.

And let's face it, it's not about children, it's about their parents. Why do they want to make a child ashamed of the human body, and suggest that it's dirty to look at? We actually have many families who stop and look and have a conversation about it. Children should not be ashamed of nudity; it's an education issue.

But what about the testicles?! Zell says they actually belong to Hanford, who played a significant role in creating the show. They were once attached to an old roommate who underwent a sex change operation, and he mailed them to her as a gift. So now you know. The whole ballsy exhibit ends March 21st, and the live performance will return Thursday and Friday from 3 p.m. to 7 p.m., and Saturday and Sunday from 2 p.m. to 6 p.m.

Contact the author of this article or email tips@gothamist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • david jubb

    if they want to be, naked let them, be so. i think nudity is a good thing. it makes you feel more relaxed in yourself.  you feel you can do things that were not able to ,when fully clothed.
    like walking ,cycling  all things like that.

  • jjazznola

    NSFW = stupidity.

  • wow 14th street

    I dunno but i keep seeing a naked man all over the

    Madison Sq.park area with his "handle" showing au natural.

    No crotch pubic pixels needed on 26th street & 5th but

    lot's of smiling faces taking pictures.

  • hunter.blatherer

    They look like corpses.

  • NannyState

    Those crotch pixels are rehearsing for Lady Gaga's next video.

  • AYCE

    We should all go down there and moon them. You know, put 'em on the glass!

  • laisla

    I like the way you think.

  • It isn't a "surprise move" if you...pay attention to the law?

  • hotstepper

    "is it cold in here? my crotch is feeling a bit pixelated."

    "really? [looks down] yeah, me too!"

  • paulie

    The editors at Gothamist have an obsession with pissing off people who say "That's NSFW", don't they?

    Come on guys, you're not angsty suburban teenagers anymore. I know the urge to get a good "oh, oh my" out of the masses must be cathartic, but you can start acting like adults now.

  • laisla

    So people should not shriek in horror every time they see naked flesh? I agree!

    There should be nothing shocking about nudity.

  • hotstepper

    well, they certainly like pissing off the no-ball crybaby whiners.

  • laisla

    While I agree it's not innovative or inspring, my kid has seen more nudity at a museum.

  • kennn

    not only am i sick of nudity in art ... im sick of naked hip white people in art .. haven't ryan mcginley and dash snow oversaturated the art market with pictures of naked brooklyn transplants ?

    it's far from bad art, its actually just boring and lazy .

  • NannyState

    It isn't art, it's just bad retail.

  • Clarice City

    Ulay and Abramovic already did this. Next!

  • babyhitler

    japanese guy says "me rikey"

  • JenChungsBaby

    If there was any chance of me going to check this out you can forget it now.

  • farleft

    This is a non-story until they start fucking.

  • Stephenson Billings

    What are they looking at?

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@gothamist.com