Quantcast

Even With Service Cuts, MTA Is Short $400 Million

MTA's Future Will Depend on New Governor

Even if the Metropolitan Transportation Authority implements far-reaching service cuts that would eliminate entire subway and bus lines and force students to pay to get to school, the agency will still face a $400 million budget gap. Revenue from a payroll tax has apparently come up short, again, the Daily News reports. The new revenue shortfall will make it harder for transit activists to convince the agency to not to implement the service cuts, and according to the tabloid, it raises the possibility that next year's planned fare hikes might be more than the planned increase of 7.5 percent.

Contact the author of this article or email tips@gothamist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • Pachinko

    I one time watched 7 MTA workers stand around another worker chipping away at a small accumulation of ice on the platform.

  • Abbott

    I fully support cutting the student metrocard program. Let the DOE and the city foot the bill for transporting their kids to school. It's not the MTA's job.

  • Wza

    Someone forgot to carry the 1 again.

  • SighR

    "Oh oops. there's more."

  • Polemicist

    Until there is a federal law that cancels ALL pensions and non-salary payments to government or former government workers, this will continue.

    The MTA is broke because they pay former ticket clerks $100K a year in retirement benefits and healthcare.

  • Ishtar

    That's not why the MTA is broke. They're broke because the state forces them to rely on unstable revenue streams.

  • Ishtar

    I always find comments about bad management at the MTA funny. It's the most poorly and improperly funded transportation system in any large metro area in this country.

  • NannyState

    In their world, that's actually high praise.

  • fauxsella

    The MTA is like a psychotic ex-lover who promises you again and again that they have changed their ways, only to disappoint with some pathetic rejoinder about how your personal sacrifices for them just aren't enough.

    To the MTA: Stop hurting us with your ridiculous misuse of the limited brain power you have. How much can it possibly fucking cost you to run the M train? If you want to cut costs, why don't you just hire a lobbyist to persuade our very powerful Senator to find appropriations or additional subsidies instead? Why don't you *stop* hiring corpses who cannot respond to simple inquiries like "Help, I'm being raped/attacked/insert additional dilemmas here."

    Why don't you perform a fundamental overhaul of the way you do business instead of fucking us and especially the G train?

  • raddude

    the people that are bitching here are probably the same people who said that congestion pricing was a bad idea. maybe if we tolled our bridges and made driving in a limited resource (manhattan roads) we wouldn't be in this predicament.

  • streber

    yeah, right...

    ...Just like all that cigarette tax money has led to free health care.

    Congestions pricing would've been simply a new revenue stream to be abused.

    It's not that they don't take enough in... it's that the money isn't used properly.

    New revenue streams just lead to new abuses.

  • imperialnetwork

    Cigarette taxes have saved the taxpayers billions in Medicare costs. Nobody could ever have reasonably thought cigarette taxes would pay for free health care, seeing as we spend about $2.3 trillion on health care/year (according to the Office of Actuary Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services)

  • books

    2.3 trillion. yeah quote what entire NATION pays when talking about the NYC tax on smokes. good use of statistics their Einstein.

  • Steven

    Exactly. The MTA needs to start using the money they have more useful.

    More money will equal more corruption and much more wasteful spending.

  • books

    +1

  • Steven

    Exactly. The MTA needs to start using the money they more useful.

    More money will equal more corruption and much more wasteful spending.

  • jlocke

    Interesting to see all the people complaining about fare hikes. Sucks, I know, but you realize the current fare doesn't even begin to cover the cost of your train ride, let alone maintenance, upgrades, construction, and gross mismanagement. $2.25 is far too low to cover the costs of even a modest transportation system.

  • Stewart

    That's true, $2.25 doesn't pay the full cost. That's one of the reasons my taxes are so high.

    Perhaps it's time to start cutting labor costs?

  • ilovejapgirls

    betcha, in two years subway fares will be 3 dollars one way, and they still will be broke.

  • ilovejapgirls

    remember when MTA was loaded with money 5-6 years ago? wasteful construction(along with the usual kickbacks,etc), meaningless projects, wasteful renovating interior of trains(not actually getting new ones), insane and powerful unions, overstaffed MTA police force, insane overtime shifts for many employees, and the usual corruption here and there - BAM - 400 million deficit.

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@gothamist.com