Quantcast

Judge Rejects City's Private Ballfield Plan For Randalls Island ... Again

011008randallsisland.jpg

A state judge has again ordered Mayor Bloomberg to follow the city's land use review procedure and hold public hearing about his controversial plan to construct new sports fields on Randalls Island and rent them to 20 private schools. Under the Mayor's plan, private schools like Buckley, Chapin and Dalton would pay $45 million for exclusive access to a part of the new athletic facilities during peak after-school hours — a move that critics contend would turn public land into private land.

A year after a state judge first ruled that the city must hold public hearings and follow standard planning regulations, a State Supreme Court Justice slammed the Mayor's position as "audacious" and said that the city had attempted to “flout and undermine the purpose” of the city's required land-use review procedure and avoid mandatory community input, according to the Times. Justice Marilyn Shafer also stated that Bloomberg's move to have the project approved by only the Franchise Concession and Review Committee — which he controls — showed "more daring than logic." She rejected the Bloomberg's revised deal and ordered the city to pay the legal fees of the project opponents.

Over the years, the project's budget has swelled from $70 million to $189 million, "making it one of the most expensive park rehabs in recent city history," according to the Daily News. But the renovations have moved forward, and the project is now 97 percent finished. However, if the city's Randalls Island plan is rejected as it goes before the local community board, Borough President, City Planning Commission and City Council, the city might be forced to rip up the newly-done work, said lawyer Norman Siegel, who represents project opponents. "We have no objection to the 20 private schools using Randalls Island," he told the Post. "But they shouldn't get a disproportionate priority over everybody else because they're wealthy." Supporters insist the project will be beneficial to public school students by increasing the number of fields available to them from two to 20.

Contact the author of this article or email tips@gothamist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • NannyState

    The private schools can build their shit in the Meadowlands where they like that sort of thing.

  • nycbrent

    In the story above it says, "...the city might be forced to rip up the newly-done work..." I don't get it...why would anyone demand that $189 million in work be destroyed, and then replaced by...what? Dirt fields, like they had there before? Whom would that benefit? It sounds like they're proposing to cut off their hand to spite their neighbor.



    Also, regarding the posts about birds, above - I saw a pheasant near the tennis center two years ago when I was running out there...it probably escaped from a Queens butcher!

  • books

    the government is not a corporation. bloomberg may be good at making money but thats is NOT and should NOT be the goal of government.

  • 240Bravo

    As a kid I used to ride my bike out there and it was a cool place. It was also a good spot for birds, but thanks to Bloomturd a lot of the birds are gone ever since the trees north of the Fire Academy were destroyed. They had to make way for the tennis club. I guess tennis is more important than red winged blackbirds & pheasants.

  • Nyctini11

    Douchberg only relates to Vultures, so of course the other birdies don't matter, unless he's hungry.

  • robdesign13

    There should be no exclusivity in any of NYC parks or playgrounds. (no not even Gramercy) If these institutions want to donate their money to develop them, that's fine. But there should be no special treatment to their usage. Every time these types of deals are made, it opens it up to more. Could this eventually lead to all public parks being taken away from the public and given to the rich, because of donations for restoration. No, but possible. This is not democratic at all.

  • FrankMartin



    Some are really nice fields right on the river. And we need more open spaces. Regardless of how this sorts out the idea of tearing them up should be dismissed. That is madness.

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@gothamist.com