Quantcast

Holder Talks With 9/11 Victims' Families About Trials

2009_11_coholder.jpg
Photograph of a woman holding up a picture of pilot Charles Burlingame, whose plane was crashed into the Pentagon, behind AG Eric Holder by Alex Brandon/AP
The furor over holding the trials of alleged 9/11 terror plotters in a Manhattan federal court continues to simmer. Yesterday, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder testified in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee yesterday, "I’m not scared of what [terror mastermind] Khalid Sheik Mohammed has to say at trial — and no one else needs to be either."

The Post reports that Sen. Jon Kyl (R-Ariz) noted that Mohammed said he wanted to plead guilty at a military tribunal, "How could he be more likely to get a conviction than that?" to which Holder replied, "These trials do not hinge on the desire of Khalid Sheik Mohammed. He will not select the prosecution venue. I will — and I have." Holder did speak with victims' families afterward; Alice Hoagland, who lost her son on Flight 93 said:

I have great respect for you and your office. But I have to say I take great exception to your decision to give short shrift to the military commissions and put the five most heinous criminals and war criminals into court in New York City. I can't help feeling that it does make New York City a much more dangerous place and a target. And it will give these ugly people like Khalid Sheik Muhammad and Ramzi Bin Alshib especially very eloquent access to all of the media sources of the United States.

Holder assured her, "I respect the concerns that you have raised. These are issues I certainly considered. I did not give short shrift to military commissions. This was a tough decision. This was a tough decision."

President Obama stepped into the fray yesterday, saying that critics won't find it "offensive at all when he's convicted and when the death penalty is applied to him," but then had to backtrack, "I'm not going to be in that courtroom. That's the job of the prosecutors, the judge and the jury." Some experts say this gives the defense a chance to show that the suspects can't get a fair trial.

Contact the author of this article or email tips@gothamist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • Dirk

    Once again... why does the government have to consult with 9/11 families concerning policy? Frankly I'm tired of these families bitching and moaning about every single thing related to 9/11.

  • jchez

    So Obama is saying that Holder and him are just doing this to have a show trial?



    Holder's statement of "Failure is not an option" shows that he truly an idiot. Quoting movie cliches is not a sound legal strategy. The so called 20th hijacker got spared the death penalty by one juror as did the last terrorists tried in NY. The 20th hijacker trial was a circus and the judge almost dismissed all the charges but was overturned by the appellate court. This is not a good precedent.

  • Kojak

    "I can't help feeling that it does make New York City a much more dangerous place and a target."



    We can't make this city a bigger target than it already is unless we paint a giant bullseye across midtown.



    And since when do we consult the 9/11 families on policy?

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@gothamist.com