NASA Crashing Stuff Into The Moon This Morning

2009_10_moonshot.jpg
Left: Artist's rendering showing the Centaur upper stage rocket separating from its shepherding spacecraft on a trajectory toward the moon; right: still image from the 1902 Georges Méliès silent film "Le Voyage Dans La Lune"

In hopes of seeing whether there's water or ice on the moon, NASA is crashing two spacecraft onto the moon's surface. The AP explains, "The crashing spaceship was launched in June along with an orbiter that's now mapping the lunar surface. LCROSS -- short for Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite and pronounced L-Cross -- is on a collision course with the moon, attached to an empty 2.2-ton rocket that helped get the probe off the ground."

NASA says that the rocket—the Atlas V's Centaur—is expected to make impact with the moon around 7:30 a.m. (creating a 6.2 mile dust plume), and then four minutes later, the LCROSS "will fly through the debris plume, collecting and relaying data back to Earth before impacting the lunar surface and creating a second debris plume." (Here's a good graphic.) The LCROSS project manager Dan Andrews said, "'This is going to be pretty cool. We'll be going right down into it. Seeing the moon come up at you is pretty spectacular."

NASA will stream coverage starting at 6:15 a.m. at NASA TV. More fun stats from the AP: The spacecraft will hit the moon at 5,600 mph or "more than seven times the speed of sound" and "the explosion will have the force of 1.5 tons of TNT and throw 772,000 pounds of lunar dirt out of the crater." (FYI—the moon experiences crashes like this a few times a month from regular ol' space rocks.)

Email This Entry


Comments (22) [rss]

Sounds like a ten year old came up with this idea. Boys playing with their toys. "This is going to be pretty cool." Interesting? Maybe. Cool? No.

Do you know anything about lunar science, or are you just winging this? I suppose you can easily come up with another way to check the composition of the lunar surface inside a deep crater.

Send Bruce Willis and Ben Affleck to the moon in the secret military space shuttle.

user-pic

wouldn't it be funny if the moon just left it's orbit?

oh nevermind.

Looking forward to the moon greeting us as liberators.

If they did this at night with a full moon I wonder if you can see anything with a telescope?

The Earth is round and the moon revolves around it. People west of the Mississippi will be able to see plenty of hot rocket-on-moon action.

Most Embarassing Space Mission Ever.

Now we are going to be at war with the underground moon civilization. Do we have enough forces to open up a third front?

They should have tried economic sanctions first, maybe a few UN resolutions...

ah the usual suspects (posters), folks they'll be here all night!

When I saw this news today, I immediately thought of this old Mr. Show skit:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Csj7vMKy4EI

wonder how much it cost to deliberately crash two things (because one must not be enough...) into the moon

Your curiosity about the universe is heartwarming? If you had bothered to pay even the slightest bit of attention you would have learned that the first impact is to raise dust and the second impact belongs to the instrument that will fly through, measure, and send back information on the dust's properties. This was spelled out in the post above, you didn't even have to follow a link!

maybe we should try to get water to drought stricken parts of Africa instead of worrying about water on the moon.

Where do you think they are planning to send the Africans?

exploding devices work wonders when there is only one side taking the decision and the other only damages!

Wow. 40 years ago we apparently had the first manned space mission to the moon.

You'd think by now we'd have been there hundreds of times, instead of essentially throwing rocks at it.

Makes me really believe that the 1969 Moon Landing was a hoax. I mean we've had numerous Space Shuttle missions. Why haven't we had numerous Moon Shuttle missions...???

What would be the point of a Moon Shuttle mission? There was very little reason to keep having manned moon missions once the US beat the Soviets there. There's no profit to be gained, a moon colony would be prohibitively expensive, and the moon, LCROSS and a few other missions being the exception, is not very scientifically interesting.

Going up in the space shuttle is a lot easier than going to the Moon. The shuttle only orbits a couple of hundred miles up. It takes a heck of a lot more fuel and money to achieve escape velocity to go 240,000 miles to the Moon. That's why it took the massive Saturn V rocket to carry just three astronauts, a spindly lunar module and the occasional Lunar Rover there back in the Apollo days.

Although I'd have to disagree with Dr. Zippy. The Moon is quite interesting, scientifically speaking.

Post a comment (Comment Policy)

Tips

Get your daily dose of New York first thing in the morning from our weekday newsletter, now in beta.

About Gothamist

Gothamist is a website about New York. More

Editor: Jen Chung
Publisher: Jake Dobkin

Newsmap

newsmap.jpg

Contribute

Latest Tip:

too bad gothamist is the only site on the www to view while at work I love the ads - it pays for wh
[more]

Latest Photo:

Subscribe

Use an RSS reader to stay up to date with the latest news and posts from Gothamist.

All Our RSS

Follow us