Voting at yesterday's primary had no lines, unlike last November's presidential election (November 2008 election photograph by urzzz on Flickr)
In fact, a PolitickerNY reader wonders about the "reverse drop-off" between the unofficial voting results for the mayoral primary, vs. the ones for comptroller and Public Advocate. Over 354,000 people voted in the City Comptroller race and over 347,000 in the Public Advocate race.
Thompson was asked today, "Are you disheartened by the fact that people came out to vote for public advocate and comptroller and sat out mayor's race?" and responded, "Not in the least. There's always something that you can find. I got over 70 percent yesterday in the primary," and added that other races were "hot"—"I think that many people looked at the race for mayor, at least in the primary, as kind of a foregone conclusion and I think that's why it didn't generate as much interest as it could've. But that was the primary. We're talking about the November election and the direction this city's going to go in."





The more people who don't vote, the more valuable the votes are of those who do bother get off their ass.
I am stunned to find myself agreeing with ides of march.
People really don't understand how much more valuable your vote is in the Primary-- especially when it comes to seats that Democrats always win (basically anything but mayor).
people in afghanistan have to be worried about being blown up on their way to the polls, yet new york city has a lower voter turnout. that's disgusting, new york.
Well, we could get mugged.
I voted for DA, Comptroller and City Council, but not Mayor. I don't like Bloomie but I don't like Thompson either.
who do you not-like less?