Wife Tries To Abort And Poison Husband's Lovechild
Man Injured By Tree Limb Files Suit Against City
Charles Barron Will Run For Council Speaker
Alleged Tiger Mistress Is Unrecognizable To Dead Fiancee's Dad
New Jersey State Senate To Vote On Gay Marriage
The Washington Post devoted an editorial to repeat something it did in November: Ask Rep. Charles Rangel (D-Harlem) to "step aside as chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee." This comes after last week's revelations that Rangel amended his financial reports, suddenly realizing there's $500,000 or maybe even over $1 million in assets he hadn't disclosed a few years ago.
The WaPo details Rangel's lowlights: "his contact with a potential donor to a pet project who also had business before the committee...his using official stationery to raise funds for that pet project, paying below-market rents on four Harlem apartments, failing to report income from a Florida condominium sale and failing to pay taxes on a home in the Dominican Republic." Oh, and the other "subcommittee investigation into lobbyist-paid trips by Mr. Rangel and four other members of Congress."
Earlier this year, Rangel managed to keep his chairmanship of the powerful House Ways and Means Committee. Last night, WCBS 2 offered this intriguing tidbit: "CBS 2 HD has discovered that since ethics probes began last year the 79-year-old congressman has given campaign donations to 119 members of Congress, including three of the five Democrats on the House Ethics Committee who are charged with investigating him. Charlie's 'angels' on the committee include Congressmen Ben Chandler of Kentucky, G.K. Butterfield of North Carolina and Peter Welch of Vermont. All have received donations from Rangel." Baruch College's Doug Muzzio speculates, "Clearly he sees himself as having a problem and he is contributing to members who might look favorably." Welch's spokesman say he returned the money, "In an abundance of caution, he has returned all campaign contributions [of nearly $20K] from Mr. Rangel."
add to stumble upon
add to reddit
tweet this
post to facebook
Yeah. I'm sure Charlie is falling all over himself to comply with the Washington Post's request.
This is why politicians, just like diapers, need to be changed so frequently... and often for the same reason.
go ahead, charlie- blame the media
I want you to know up front that I loathe today's brand of pols across the board. But I'd like to know why E. Spitzer was drummed out of office in a heartbeat for soliciting a prostitute (an act that didn't cost taxpayers a dime) but Rangel (a habitual tax cheat) remains in office regardless of the fact that he is literally taking money out of our pockets. What is wrong with this picture?
For the umtenth time: Spitzer resigned because he was facing federal felony charges, NOT BECAUSE HE WAS WITH A HOOKER. Sending money across state lines for an illegal purpose is a federal crime.
You're welcome.
Step aside? Step into a jail cell would be more appropriate. One law for the lawmakers, another for the average citizen.
You beat me to it.
The IRS has already told a taxpayer who made an honest mistake that her "Geithner TurboTax" excuse would not be accepted. Our present Secretary of the Treasury had no comment.
Where's the Sandman and his hook?