Two Of Three Charges Dismissed Against Subway Pug Owner

LOL! Oh my, now I 'lack balls.. hiding behind an obscure identity".. and "have nothing going on in my life.."

Nice one! Only you've forgotten that if I'm here hiding behind an obscure identity, then you are following me, spending your time creating your very own anonymous identity SOLELY to reply to me! Kettle, Pot.. Pot.. Kettle. Ditto for your "get a life" mantra. Yes, you've said that many times, thank you. Kettle, Pot, etc.

1. "Act like a woman please" - Is not a reason to walk away from a police officer when youre being stopped for violating the law. It's an attempt to reframe the situation as another case of Chrissie As Perpetual Victim. Sorry, there's no misogyny here. Instead of accepting responsibility, you defend breaking the law. Next time a cop tries stopping you, I suggest you walk away, and then when you're handcuffed, just say, "he was looking at me all weird. I thought he was a misogynist. Or some other term you pulled out of your Sociology 101 text. Bottom line, you fail to accept any responsibility for unloading on a cop without provocation and walking way from him as he's asking questions.

2. Having a sick dog on the subway is terrible for the dog and owner. Here's a tip - don't take a sick dog in a carrier in the heat and crowd and it won't vomit. Chrissie caused her dog to become sick and then made it EVERYONE'S problem on the subway because, as with every other part of this story - SHE is the only person who matters.

3. The "witnesses" first claimed they 'saw everything'.. then one said she had to run upstairs to make phone calls during the incident. Her boyfriend, the photographer, later said that he was there for "MOST" of the incident. So much for their credibility when it comes to stating what was and wasn't said.

4. "Dumbass cop"??? Were you there? Do you know him? Or are you relying totally on Chrissie's constantly changing stories to defame someone who was doing their job? I know the answer. The union does provide lawyers to cops who are more often than not falsely accused. The CCRB has a very low percentage of any action taken against a cop because so many people inflate, exaggerate and make up claims to attempt to get them off the hook. Brodigan has a lawyer and she said she was suing the NYPost, etc. Has she sued her previous employers as well for similar situations? Let us know, please. It might be a pattern...

5. As far as I can tell, Brodigan did a handful (or less) of some tiny internet pieces for Plum TV. Plum TV fired her and said it had nothing to do with the allegations of her anti-semitic remarks. Maybe she was fired because she said she was too ill to work, and then she was appearing on TV programs and seeing out interviews all day? If she worked for me and called in sick and I saw her mincing around Times Square, looking fit and happy, I'd fire her too. Oh, since you know her so well, how many other times was she fired? Maybe there's a pattern emerging here...

6. Ethnicity was brought into this by the NY Post's witness. Brodigan didn't deny it. Who the hell doesn't deny saying something they didnt say? Chrissie wants you to believe :

- that she might have said it

- that she didn't know he was Jewish (YOU say he was obviously Jewish, Chrissie initially said she DIDNT NOTICE his religion!)

- that she didnt remember saying it

- that she absolutely definitely never said it and that she was a civil rights scholar.

7. Post Traumatic Stress - WHAT IS YOUR POINT? That because she was stressed by a situation that she created herself that this entitles her to lie? This whole statement of yours is a flying leap into the uncorroborated spin/BS that I'm talking about here.

- There is NO evidence of any beating

- There are NO charges of any beating/spitting against any of Chrissie's cell mates.

- If she was beaten in jail, where are the photos?

- If she was punched in the back, where are the photos? You know the witnesses incl. photographer were there the WHOLE TIME!!!

- By the way, you claim there was a beating. Chrissie herself said the officer MIGHT have gone too far. Get it? MIGHT. Also means "MIGHT NOT". You should look at Chrissies words before you form your opinions.

8. Viane Delgado - There are many Viane Delgados across the USA, according to intelius.com. Just because the NY Post didn't share her contact information with you or Gothamist, doesnt mean the NY Post concocted her out of thin air. They could have just as easily said, "a source tells us that a witness reported...".. But they named her. Just because Gothamist cant find her doesnt mean she doesnt exist.

So, in conclusion, I expect you/Chrissie to continue to ignore all of the facts, most of which are her admissions, and to slander the officer, and defend your position with the word "Suckit".

I don't think I'll seek out Chrissie via social media. (She keeps deleting herself from so many sites it's hard to keep track anyway.)

She tends to marry guys she meets within a week and then divorce them soon after, and I want something longer term, you know? [And the squeaky voice, frozen-face smile and bingo arms would weird me out.] Happy now?

Get a life! :) And thank you for taking the time to sign up for an account here, appropriate part of my user name and hound me. Hey, I think YOU may actually love me!!

XOXOXOXO

Dude - step away from the keyboard, go outside, and go get a beer. You're crossing into crazy-town.

Rego its totally cool to be interested in a news item and blog about it! No harm done.

I dont think there's "evidence" of anything -- that's your word choice not mine! He didnt show up for the hearing and he altered the tickets after the fact. C'mon now -- That's not the best way to look blameless.

NYorker - Brodigan said these typos resulting in the dismissals on the two citations "vindicated" her. You wrote, "the slightly altered tickets (altered after the violations were handed out) make the police officer look like he's hiding something."

You know, there were several police and several witnesses at the scene, and Brodigan herself was at the hearing. All she had to do was say, "Judge, in the interest of being honest and truthful, I will confirm that the incident took place at 4:51pm, not 3:51pm. Officer Witriol made a typo. Now lets go forward with the facts and I will make my case for having these tickets dismissed."

Nope. Instead she escaped responsibility for her actions and then, because of a lucky break which she took advantage of, starting writing more garbage on the net, claiming her positing was vindicated.

Only her case was not heard. NOTHING was 'vindicated'. That she wouldn't just walk away and thank her lucky stars for the typos wasn't enough, she had to continue throwing stones at the officer.

As for Witriol not showing up at the hearing - what does that mean? That his boss didn't want him to waste a half day for a $100 fine? That he made plans to celebrate that Jewish holiday (mentioned above), that he was on vacation? that he wasn't notified? That the boss told him not to bother as her lawyer would get the citations dismissed because of the typos?

With all the witnesses to the exact time and place, it's ridiculous to believe that Witriol intentionally entered the incorrect time - on purpose.

Brodigan is still due back in court on the other charge - we'll see if he shows for that.

Woah, what did this girl do to you? You're awfully obsessed with this story and this girl. I'm compelled to point out a few things:

1.) This all started when she couldn't find her photo ID fast enough, but it's clear that he never told her why she needed it to begin with - and, didn't include a reason for why she was asked for ID on her ticket, so it would have been dismissed anyway. Why pay a fine if you didn't do something wrong to begin with? Cops have to follow procedures - is he just a bad or dumb cop? A cop that can't follow basic ticketing directions isn't someone we want with a gun is it?

2.) Is it against the law to walk away from a cop and say something rude like "fuck off" if he's not writing a ticket? No. Dumb? Yes. Illegal? No.

3.) If Witriol showed up at the hearing his testimony could be used against him by the CCRB, and don't you think his union lawyers want him to shut the f up? And, since you've been out there gathering evidence you've heard that there was no police report filed - right?

5.) As for her story? Ever occur to you that she might have been dealing with some sort of post-traumatic stress? Or, do you think she gets beaten and arrested often enough that she should be used to it? Violence against women in any situation is F'd up. Did he think she was going to run away with a dog in her arms? Lame.

6.) And Ray did tell the press last week that he feels that Brodigan was handled too roughly.

Seriously though - what did she do to you? I mean, you hate this girl with a fierce passion. Or is it that you love her and she hates you?

This is how you handful of Chrissie's Pals all support your friend. By ignoring all of the facts in the case and trying to discredit those who back up their words with the facts.

I am not 'obsessed' with Brodigan, I don't hate her.

I feel sorry for her, and find her repulsive in every way.

Having said that, and having played your game, here are replies to your points:

1 & 2. This did not "all start" when she couldn't find her photo ID fast enough. Chrissie herself said that she WALKED AWAY FROM THE OFFICER. By all accounts, while being observed violating the law (Chrissie admits she was breaking the law) she was asked politely to produce her ID, and in response she walked away from the officer.

Is it illegal to walk away from and curse at a Police officer when youre being stopped? You tell me, legal genius.

Your question assumes that she "didnt do something wrong" - and your question is therefore not a valid one. She herself admits to resisting arrest. Carrying any animal on the subway without a carrier is against the law. No one is arguing that point.

3. You make a lot of assumptions and draw conclusions about the officer not appearing at a hearing over two inconsequential tickets. You have no idea why he didn't attend, and neither do I. My educated guesses make more sense to me than do yours.

5. As for Chrissie's story being a result of post traumatic stress disorder... what are you saying? That because she has some psychological issues, she's entitled to lie?

While its true that there are a lot of posters on this, the NY Post and other forums claiming to know Chrissie from here, DC and VA and suggest she has a long history of these kinds of behaviors, no one has said her PTSD caused her to lie in this incident.

Her story certainly has "evolved" though, and the questions I asked above regarding her numerous contradictory statements to all sorts of media - remain unanswered, even by someone who claims to be Chrissie's friend.

ie:

- I dont remember calling Witriol anti-semitic names

..later:

- I didn't even know he was Jewish

..later:

- I never called him anti-semitic names...

and:

- He was obviously Jewish..

and...

- I was fired by Plum TV for these anti-Semitic remarks

and...

PlumTV: Brodigan's firing had NOTHING to do with the allegations of her comments..

- - - - - -

with regard to her phony 'beatdown' by Witriol - she claimed he twisted her breasts, punched her in the back, and that she was put in a cell with three prisoners who beat her.

Where is ANY corroboration for THAT? Hello, witnesses who were on the scene the whole time - where are the photos of Chrissie being punched in the back? Where are the complaints of assault against her three cellmates?

..etc...etc...

Yet, people like you still come back here, talk about *me* and ignore what this discussion is supposed to be about.

The discussion should be facts v fiction. But, you seem to be obsessed with Brodigan or at least denigrating her - don't you have more going on in your life to be compelled by?

FACTS:

1. Brodigan walked away when the cop said, "You want to act like a woman, I'm going to treat you like a woman." Would you want your mom, girlfriend, sister, etc. to hang around and be treated that way by a cop?

2. Having a sick dog out of a bag is humane NOT illegal. Don't you think the cop overreacted by putting handcuffs on her? How do you produce ID if you're cuffed?

3. Witnesses who took photos testified to the CCRB and back Brodigan's story up. CCRB has the 911 call placed by the witnesses who were trying to get help for Brodigan.

4. Dumbass cop altered all 3 tickets & didn't go to the hearings - WTF? If she was so guilty why not show up? He didn't show up because anything he says goes to the CCRB, which is investigating has more than 4 complaints against him. He has a lawyer and a union making sure he doesn't fuck things up anymore for the department. What does Brodigan have?

5. Brodigan lost her job after being suspended pending an investigation into the NY Post's claims of bigotry, and the day she had her hearing her CEO/boss at Plum TV was fired. Coincidence?

6. Cop was obviously Jewish, but why bring ethnicity into the discussion at all? The only reason it came into play was because the NY Post created a story. Do you think Brodigan was more focused on his ethnicity or her pug? Do you know Brodigan to be a bigot? That's a hell of claim if you have no evidence (your word) to back that up.

7. Post Traumatic Stress, have you ever had it? The last time you were beaten, handcuffed, violated, and jailed - did you have a press release ready to defend yourself against another assault by the press. Having a dog out of a bag and then having to answer absurd questions of bigotry made by a tabloid is a leap.

8. Viane Delgado, the Post's witness who started the story of Brodigan yelling racial slurs, has not been found to date. There is no record of her existence.

As for Brodigan's background - wtf? (again) how long have you known this girl? Do you believe everything you read online? Is it possible that people are just assholes who go out to cause trouble? Does everybody you've ever met think you're remarkable?

Suckit Rego. Suckit. If it's such an issue for you maybe you should give her a call yourself, she's all over social media - surely you can find a more direct way to fuck with her than below the fold here, but I'm going to guess that you'll keep venting about her behind an obscure identify because you lack the lack the balls Brodigan so clearly has.

I'm not pro-Witriol, I'm anti- trying to ruin an officer's career with lies. Lies that Brodigan herself has fed to various blogs, TV stations, etc.

Unfortunatley there are people like you out there who will take the bait - [note your earlier posting that making a typo on a citation from 3:41 to 4:41 is *evidence of a coverup.].

I don't know either Brodigan or Witriol. I just hate what Brodigan has been trying to do and trying to get away with. Ultimately, she will fail, Witriol will be vindicated (as he already was by Ray Kelly) - but he's already been labeled a misogynist, there are people out there who believe he punched Chrissie in the back in broad daylight (where are the photos of that and the bruises?), that he threatened to kill her dog, also in a busy public place (where is the corroboration for that from these witnesses?) - that he handcuffed her and put her in a cell where she was beaten and spit on - where is Chrissies criminal complaint for being beaten in jail??? etc...

Why not answer some of those real questions instead of making assumptions and trying to discredit the poster?

Might make things less boring around here!

a select few pro-Witriol people on this thread clearly have a _very_ personal axe to grind. That's fine since this is a blog. But they are boring.

This broad should have been collared and sent through the system on the violation. I bet a night down at the "bookings" would have been an eye opening experience for her to say the least.

RegoParker is your typical pound of flesh nazi.

100!!! glad I could contribute.

What happened to 99?

Officer Witriol wrote it, but then crossed it out.

OMGTHISHAPPENEDTHREEWEEKSAGOTHISISTHEINTERNETWHYISITSTILLINTHEETHER?

maybe police should investigate RegoParker as one of the Chrissie's harassers. leave the woman alone, crazy zealots.

Here, LMGTFY. http://lmgtfy.com/?q=zealot

anything to deflect attention from your starry-eyed stalking campaign, eh pard?

Every time I come back here Rego Parker has already said everything I want to. Way to follow up and reply to idiots who would rather have feelings than hear facts.

In a way I am relieved, but I still want people to know that this brodigan broad is nucking futs.

Brodigan was also disappointed Witriol did not appear (and therefore could not be questioned) at the hearing.

Well perhaps if they didn't ask a religious Jewish cop to appear on Tisha B'Av he could have made it.

I wouldn't expect Brodigan to have any sensitivity towards someone else's belief system. It's all about her after all.

Tisha B'Av was from sunset on Wednesday to nightfall Thursday (today). The hearing was held Wednesday morning, so Officer Witriol could still have attended.

..unless his boss didn't think his attending was worth the loss of his time on the street, or unless he'd taken the day off to prepare for the holiday, or unless he wasn't notified that he was needed there...

C'mon trolls! you can make it to 100! GO GO GO!

The racist sexist pervert Hasid cop should be thrown off the force because he's too stupid to do his job and too mentally challenged due to a ridiculous level of inbreeding to deal with the public. And Brodigan should sue the city and her former employer.

Wow, that's a lot of unfounded hate. Racist? Pervert? Mentally Challenged? Aren't you a gem.

Eli and others - here is the contact information for the CCRB board's Executive Director.

http://nyc.gov/html/mail/html/mailccrb.html

Please only contact the CCRB with FACTUAL information regarding this case. If you were a witness, if you have information about Chrissie Brodigan that might be helpful or useful for the CCRB to know.

Are you really getting this exercised over something that happened between two strangers? If it's just the principle of the thing, there are hundreds of injustices daily you could be getting worked up over. Clearly you have some personal agenda.

And youre policing the comments section of this non-story to tell those you disagree with to 'get a life'?

My "agenda" is to make sure Witriol doesn't get smeared and labeled for the rest of his career. He's already been called a 'misogynist' [for allegedly saying, "act like a lady"... ] and is being accused of sexual assault, threatening to have Brodigan's dog killed, of punching her in the back, etc. -

Sorry if you don't like my 'agenda' - but reading Chrissie's victim blog last night turned my stomach and there needs to be some balance to her bullshit.

So you are a friend of Joel's! There you go, why didn't you say so? I happen to be a friend of Chrissie's. I don't believe she made those alleged racist slurs because they are out of character for her.

Two things -

1. No, I am not a friend of Officer Witriol. I don't know him nor have I ever met him nor do I know anyone who knows him.

2. Your "eureka" moment there, (complete with exclamation) is false.

Whether or not Chrissie made anti-semetic remarks has nothing to do with anything I've written in this thread. The Post claims there is a witness to her remarks, and the photographer and his girlfriend have been shown to have not been at the scene for the entire duration, despite their initial statements to the contrary.

What I have written about, most of which is confirmed via Chrissie's own words - that she carried a sick animal on the subway, in the heat and crowd, causing it to vomit. (read: she caused the problem)

That she failed to follow simple instructions, became belligerent, resisted arrest, cursed at and humiliated the officer at the scene. That she sat on the floor and forced the officers to pick her up and then cried "brutality" - sending photos of small upper arm bruises to various media, including local TV, where she was interviewed the following day. She neglected to mention that she takes medicine that can cause bruising and that she bruises easily. Oops.

The rest of the smear job was ALL Chrissie-initiated, and apparently this is one of many similar situations she's been in.

As her 'friend' - why dont you clear up all of those past incidents? Was the previous poster making up stories about her being in Bellevue? Was she fired from all of those other jobs in such a short period?

Please, "friend of Chrissie" - dispel all the falsehoods being posted about your pal and let us benefit by your wisdom!!!!

Or, just tell us to "get a life"...

You still haven't explained why you've selected this crusade to devote such energy to. There are millions of people on the Internet that are wrong about all sorts of things, and could benefit from the education that you provide so well. If this isn't about Joel for you, perhaps it's about Chrissie.

I chose to be here because the story and portrayal of Officer Witriol was unfair and unjust. And the more I pointed out the facts - you know, stuff like Chrissie saying at first that she didnt recall saying anything anti-semetic, then saying she didn't even notice Officer Witriol's religion, then later saying that she knew he was "obviously" Jewish, then later 'remembering' that she never said anything - absolutely nothing - about his religion. And then saying she was suffering from an anxiety attack during the incident .....

... and all the while people like you, choose to repeatedly ignore the facts and smear the office.

Thats why I'm here.

Now, why are you here? If it's to defend your friend, then please help us understand:

1. Was she sent to Bellevue after freaking out on one of her many former employers?

2. Why has she changed so many jobs in such a short time?

3. Are all of these reports of her personality issues all fabricated? If so, which are the lies?

If you want to add something to this discussion and support your friend by telling us the truth about these posts made in various forums - then you will be doing a real service. You know, maybe those posters are all wrong??

Do you spend hours involving yourself in every “unfair and unjust” story you come across on the Internet? Or only ones involving Joel? Or Chrissie? I refuse to believe that this is the greatest injustice worthy of your sustained attention.

Classic - you say you're her friend, but fail to defend her against any of those important and serious allegations made against her in various places on the 'net, but you keep making this about *me*.

The conclusions everyone can therefore draw about *you* are:

1. You either know those things to be true but won't confirm them.

2. You have no knowledge of them, thus making your claims that Chrissie 'couldnt possibly have done that' - worthless.

I'm sure your friend appreciates your support. If you were a real friend, you might look at all the reportage and comments, and then tell Chrissie to apologize to Officer Witriol, withdraw her complaint and thank god that he made two typos on her tickets that saved her hundreds of dollars. (You know, instead of saying that this 'vindicates' her or proves some of her tin-hat nonsense.)

And what conclusions can we draw about you? Having given no convincing reason for your sustained and particular fascination with this topic, I'm going back to the original suspicion: you are a friend of Joel's wasting your time trolling for him. I'm sure he appreciates the effort. Because, you know, it's really quite important what the Internet thinks.

Such an important case, what a shame he made those "typos" on the tickets! Doh! I'm sure he was eager for closure, but unfortunately, accidents happen, and he blew his only chance for vindication. Let him know that should be more careful at the typewriter next time.

You know, I think you may actually be Chrissie herself.

You answer no questions, claim that Chrissie is a wonderful person, ignore the pile of evidence to the contrary, and instead of arguing facts, you continue to make false claims that I'm somehow a party to this.

Let's pretend for a second that I am the Officers twin brother. The facts are still the facts and you have said nothing to dispute any of the negative issues surrounding you?/Chrissie, which leads me and probably most others to draw the appropriate conclusion.

So, we all await your support of your friend:

1. Was Chrissie really in Bellevue because of a serious incident with a former employer? Or is the above poster a liar?

2. Does she have a history of such complaints? Or are those who claim to have worked with her all liars?

As regards your childish remarks about Officer Witriol correcting a single digit on each of two summonses, you actually seem happy about that. Perhaps you?/Chrissie should learn to accept responsibility for your actions, and not resort to blaming everyone else for your problems, most of which appear to be self-inflicted.

If Chrissie had any character, she would have paid the fines for the violations she ADMITS making, and hot having her "friend" make ridiculous posts such as yours. Her claiming she's a civil rights victim and that these two typos are "vindication" leads me to believe that the Bellevue comments are indeed true.

Feel free to refute.

I heard that you were partly responsible for the Cuyahoga River fire, and that you have a green pen on your desk. Do you deny those scurrilous charges?? There are piles of evidence!! It's the Internet!!!

So concerned about people you've never met? I could tell you to get a life but clearly, this is your life. And yet, you fail at it.

OK, so you're back to calling *me* names and not answering simple questions that any true friend of Chrissie (or Chrissie herself, if that's you out there in the ether, Ms. Brodigan)... It's clear how you roll, sweetie pie.

But OK, let's play your game. I'll show you how to have a discussion since you seem incapable. Watch and learn:

1. I was a little kid in Public School during the Cuyahoga River Fire. I was either at Shea with my parents or at school or at home. I have never been to Ohio.

2. There is a green pen on my desk.

Now, your turn.

1- Did Chrissie/you? get sent to Bellevue following a physical altercation with a former employer?

2- Does Chrissie have a history of these sorts of behaviors?

3- How do you feel about aggressively smearing a police officer in blogs, press and TV without one bit of corroboration?

4- Why do you suppose Chrissie has been through so many jobs?

5- Is it correct to label one's self a "Civil Rights Scholar" after writing some fluff about flight attendants?

Also, a shout out to GothamPC for explaining why Officer Witriol wasnt at court to explain his correcting one digit on each of the summonses. (This is apparently proof to Chrissie that her human rights violations are, in her words, "vindicated".)

OK, I am holding my breath "We Can Love" for your considered replies to each of the above questions. Or, are you going to go after me again? Or characterize the questions as "scurillous" or something else.) Smart money is that you will not answer a single question or stand up for your friend.

Watch, everyone...

I wrote a reply, but it got swallowed by the software. Tell me, does "typo"-fingers Witriol write software by any chance?

LOL! Your dog ate your response.

Typical.. and you insult the officer again.

How very Brodigan of you.

I was going to ask you what is it like to have so little going on in one's own life that they take this level of interest in an event between strangers and which, even the local scheme of things, is really quite minor?

Ok, I'll indulge your dodging the questions about your "friend" for the umpteenth time now, ignore your attempted childish insults and play along. [If only to show how unable and unwilling you are to support your friend and dispel these numerous negative stories about her.]

I've already explained why I'm here. Because I'm interested in this story and offended that this officer has been labeled a misogynist, that he punched an unarmed woman in the subway (in the back), that he threatened to have Brodigan's dog killed - and that the reporting about this seems extremely one-sided. And continues to be. That's why I'm here.

Now, let's talk about you.

You claim to be Chrissie's friend and know her so well that you can claim that she'd never do what she's been accused of. (Despite her numerous changing stories and admissions.) Your life, for much of today, has revolved around some blog poster, insulting, demeaning and attempting to discredit my remarks.

So, when you tell someone to 'get a life' - you may want to say that into a mirror, honey.

If you can how to figure out how to use this software and your dog doesn't eat your homework, or you get tired of telling me to 'get a life', calling me names, claiming I'm a relative of Witriol, or whatever stupidity you come up with, I'm sure we're all anxiously awaiting your informed responses and defenses of your friend.

Or not.

Your opinion is utterly meaningless. Trolls are to be mocked, not fed.

GASP! You didn't answer ANY of the questions, refute any allegation, failed to support your so-called friend..

... and as predicted, resorted to name-calling.

As I said, how very Brodigan of you.

Sincerely,

"Troll"

PS - Get a life! ;)

personally i don't give a shit about crissie... i suspect she represents to me the majority of over-spending obnoxious midwest self-entitled williamsburgers... i don't know whether she deserved to be arrested or not... it gives me an evil pleasure watching her suffer though.

however, i think its disturbing that race was brought up at all, especially in the mysterious way it was + i believe it was completely fabricated --- as in my earlier comment, a highly credible neighbor of mine witnessed the entire event and claimed ms brodigan never said anything racist. i believe my neighbor. i hope ms brodigan doesn't get anything from her complaint... but i hope whoever fabricated the racist lies are held accountable.

You may be right about Chrissie's anti-semitic remarks vs. the officer. Or not.

I think all we know now is that the NY Post claims they spoke to someone named Viane Delgado who said she'd made those horrible statements. Gothamist asked the Post for information on this witness, but the Post never replied.

This can mean one of two things- either Viane Delgado exists and the Post got to her via some police report leaked to them, they found her by some other means (she contacted them, for instance), and I doubt the Post would share a source for a story with a blog like this.

Or, they fabricated the whole thing, risking being exposed at some point and dealing with the consequences, all over a local minor issue. That is possible though.

Taking that into account and then looking at Chrissie's responses to the Viane Delgado accuastions, she:

- initially said she didn't remember uttering those words

- later said she had no idea Witriol was Jewish

- still later said she finally did remember NEVER making those remarks

- claimed she had an anxiety attack at the time

So, that's where this whole anti-semitic issue is now. Witriol never publicy claimed anything, nor did any of the officers there. This came entirely from the NY Post, but IMO Brodigan's evolving story is at least as troubling as suspicions that the Post fabricated a witness out of thin air and invented quotes.

Possible though.

A burst of dark energy dazed everybody at the scene causing nobody to remember the facts. End of story.

Possible though.

Here is comment left by a user on another blog which I felt was a great summery description of poor Chrissie:

ChelseaInsect

07/09/09

"Enough is enough, Chrissie! Everyone who has worked with this person knows that she is seriously unbalanced. She was recently committed to Bellevue for observation after being fired from a job. And not because the world is so mean to poor Chrissie. She refused to leave the premises, screamed and cried and tried to have a fist fight with the bewildered security guard while acting so psychotic she scared him. She has been fired from all of the jobs she has held over the past several years and has a gift for fabrication matched only by Stephen Glass.

Although she seems harmless, she has an amazing ability to create chaos all around her. Who do you think keeps submitting these stories to media outlets? She is! She is authoring her own story about being a misunderstood victim, all the while amending her online posts so that they don't incriminate her. She has admittedto having cystic fibrosis, which causes spontaneous bruising! What she wants is a huge amount of attention and to find a rich victim to sue. Be very careful of this person - she's wildly impulsive and her view of reality is highly questionable."

http://gawker.com/5311265/canned-pug-puke-arrestee-too-hot-for-tv

Well said, Eli.

Funny how some people will get behind a proven liar with a very questionable background and choose to believe her (including stuff which Brodigan eventually admitted) over an officer with an unblemished record (until now).

And when folks point out the obvious, they are "mean-girl trolling". Must be nice to live in bizarro world...

Sad.

I hope the CCRB is getting copies of all of Chrissie's internet posts, the posts of the so-called witness who first claimed to have seen everything, and later admitted to arriving on the scene when it was in progress and leaving during the incident to call the police several times. I hope the CCRB has screenshots of Chrissie's now-deleted(and Google cached) Twitter page, with all of her contradictions clearly highlighted. I hope someone also submits information about her numerous previous employers and her reasons for dismissal, her alleged history of crying wolf/victim, and photos of her alleged bruises after being punched in the back by Witriol (as she claims happened but the witnesses who were there 'for the whole thing' -must have missed.

I think the CCRB is going to be much more embarassing for Chrissie than for Witriol and I predict she'll be claiming she was railroaded by 'the man' yet again.

It's not about Joel or his friends, it's society, and civilized NY citizens sticking up for whats right, against a liberal bigot, who is not even a native New Yorker, and chose to violate and disrespect our local laws, and then publicly humiliate and attack the New York Finest for simply enforcing the law, this is unacceptable here in New York, and she is unwelcome here, let her go back to her hometown, and get a job at the local Wal-Mart.

Who knew Joel had so many friends with nothing better to do than this mean-girl trolling all day long? Lives. Get them.

So what's the page count now? Its hard to tell w/all of the replies.

Chrissie...PLEASE don't give up your fight. You need to sue the NYPD over the horrendous abuse of officer Witriol. Do NOT GIVE UP!!! I hope you have a good lawyer who will really fight for you.

Can you be more specific on what you mean by "the fight"? What is she fighting for again?

She's lucky to have 'won' by default for the errors on the tickets.

Well, you got one thing right, ManBat - there was "horrendous about of Officer Witriol".

He is the only one in this incident who could properly be called a 'victim'.

(Although I suppose anyone who has read her writing on the 'net or heard her voice would also be eligible for membership in that group.)

So much FAIL in your comment, hard to know where to start. Witriol is as much a "victim" as he is an "officer".

I can't tell if you're supporting him or criticizing him...

I have to wait until late August to see what happens to this train wreck?

Poor Chrissie, I hope she really wins her libel case against NY Post

Wow. On her Tweet page, she compares her "plight" to that of Henry Louis Gates Jr.'s:

http://tenaciouscb.tumblr.com/

Here are some choice bits:

As a recent victim of police abuse and subsequent arrest for “disorderly conduct,” the arrest of Dr. Henry Louis Gates Jr has strongly resonated with me.

and

As a civilian and a scholar of civil rights, it is my deepest conviction now that police misconduct regularly occurs.

Both Gates and I were arrested for verbally standing up for ourselves and calling out the misconduct of officers who both appear to have been wildly out of control and employing very bad judgement, transforming minor situations into major ones.

Yikes.

Manitoba - thanks for posting that link. Both hysterically funny and pathetic at the same time...

Brodigan is a "scholar of civil rights"??? LOL!

As pointed out elsewhere, her thesis was on flight attendants through the years. (I must be too young to remember the separate bathrooms for flight attendants and other people, the police beatdowns of flight attendants, the famous dozen-strong "March on Miami" (where Pan Am was headquartered), where flight attendents asked - no - demanded - never again to be called "Stews" - and won that right from the rest of us, their oppressors.)

Yes, Chrissie Brodigan isn't a lunatic, she's a civil rights scholar. My mistake.

So, keep on fighting the good fight Chrissie!

All this time I thought you ADMITTED REPEATEDLY here and on other blogs, that you cursed at an officer, insulted him, failed to produce ID as REQUIRED BY LAW, failed to put your dog in a carrier as REQUIRED BY LAW, walked away from a police officer who was talking to you, thus causing your own citation, and falsely accusing the officer of punching you in the back, twisting your breasts, threatening to kill your dog, and having you in a cell with three others who beat you and spit on you.

That's what I thought.. until now.

Now I know you were simply being a civil rights activist, and your mission was to permit ALL WOMEN WITH SICK PUGS to bring them into the subway in 100 degree heat, allow them to puke wherever they like, be transported without a carrier in violation of the law and then to terrorize the officer who does his job.

YOU GO GIRL! VOMITING-PUG-ON-SUBWAY! VOMITING-PUGS-ON-SUBWAYS!

(you will have to work on your rhyming chants as your civil rights protests gain momentum.)

I would have billy clubbed her. Definitely.

RegoParker, thumbs up for that last and your post.

BTW, has anybody watched her talk on TV, she sound like a two year old.

Hey Chrissie:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/29/nyregion/29oneway.html?ref=nyregion

(hint, hint)

I wish Witriol would sue this kook for defamation.

Brodigan claimed he twisted her breasts, threatened to kill her dog, punched her in the back, and later beaten and spit on by other prisoners - and NO ONE - not any of the alleged witnesses - corroborate any of that: CHRISSIE BRODIGAN IS A LIAR.

Her bogus stories keep changing, and those of you who believe that she was fired from this little blogging gig at Plum TV (who ever even heard of that?) - should know that she was on some other site saying she was too ill to work the day after the incident, but seemed very chipper and happy, with hair/makeup/nice duds - for her television interview. Apart from the fact that she goes through jobs like a hot knife through a knish and that there are numerous posts from folks in DC, Virginia and NYC who have worked with her and say she's koo koo - some of you seem to believe that the firing incident is all about this alleged 'Jew' comment.

Well, Plum said it wasn't. That her dismissal had nothing to do with this incident [which could have been over in 10 seconds had she not been a douchebag.]

I am glad she lost her job after the aggressive smear job she did on a police officer trying to do his job. Now she's making a big deal out of a judge dismissing charges because he corrected something on a ticket. Big freakin' deal, Chrissie. Same thing happened to me in traffic court and I didn't send blogs complaints that this was evidence of something...

Please leave NYC, Brodigan, no one wants you here.

And take your dogs with you.

I'm so glad we found you.

You were supposed to pick up your pills almost a week ago.

I know! But you keep giving me those damn generics. You cheap bastard.

Neither needs to do a thing. The die has been cast. She will always be the Albatross. And she keeps the heat on him how, by blogging? He has his job, and didn't go yakking about that day. DisCon, AKA 240.20, is a violation. Would get dismissed in a second as an ACD if no prior record, and stays out of trouble for 6 months. Hardly the basis for a big suit, based on her own actions, before, during and afterward. Chrissie Brodigan (another hit, keep 'em coming), you got what you wanted. Enjoy! I, for one, will never again use the term "hissy-fit". It will now be referred to as a Brodigan.

I hope she ruins his life. The witness can't be found, two of the tickets are invalid because the cop made a stupid mistake, and this was all started because she was trying to get her sick dog out of the station. She needs to put the heat on him and keep it there.

Never mess with a transplant when they don't have their Chai Latte in the morning.

So what's Viane Delgado's real name, Rose Witriol?

Viane Delgado is not around for the trial because she's up at her summer cottage on Vake Leorge. I know this because she's my neighbor.

comment of the month

Hahaha definitely!

No need for more comments, thanks. This one won't be topped.

Bet she could make some decent money off of a defamation suit against the NY Post if good ol' Diane DelGado remains MIA!

Just to confirm-she is still unemployed?

C'mon everybody, let's get it up to 1000! Encourage your friends to link to this story! Just want to make sure that every future prospective employer, landlord, mortgage provider and possible life partner for the next 50 years can assess with a simple Googling. Link, embed, Twitter! She wants attention, let her have it. If you had a pug you had to give up, and Googled the prospective adopter, would you giver her your dog? Let her babysit your kid? Hire her for anything? Sublet your apartment to her? Pick her up in a bar & take her home? That's OK, Chrissie Brodigan (for another hit). You have all the attention you wanted. Now good luck to you in the land of archives.

Check out the google search. Jeesh...

http://www.google.com/#hl=en&q=chrissie+brodigan&aq=f&oq=&aqi=&fp=-Pw1cEIpNGU

another case of someone's fundamentalist religious beliefs getting in the way of being an adequate public servant.

Don't think you're going to get away with that comment.

Explain exactly HOW the officer's 'fundamentalist religious beliefs got in the way of being an adequate public servant'.

Wasn't she fired because every article posted on HERE mentioned the fact that she was a PlumTV employee, therefore dragging an entire company into this mess.

And where is that press shot from? You really thought this you was going to be your big break, didn't you, JDS?

JDS and some peeps from plum tv are friends.

John Hill wrote this.

Still, it's JDS' story.

C'mon people, let's go for 300!

the slightly altered tickets (altered after the violations were handed out) make the police officer look like he's hiding something. He'll be ousted in coming months.

I forgot about ms. Viane delGado. she didn't show up huh?

So I'm guessing the NYPD never found Viane Delgado???

I was looking to open a petition to send this bigot Chrissie Brodigan back to her hometown in Virginia, as many Brooklynites have openly expressed that she is no longer welcomed in our town.

And kudos to Plum TV for dismissing her from her job.

I would like to open a petition to send you back to your mom's skanky uterus, Eli, you are not welcome in Brooklyn. Though I could see if you were Joel in disguise, I can't imagine anyone would stick up for this ridiculous excuse for a police officer and a man.

With these new revelations, I would not be surprised if the whole thing is more as Chrissie Brodigan described than the officer.

Oh, and Plum TV, I hope this bites you in the butt.

Mr. Kswiss, I can see that you are not a native Brooklynite, but I'm glad I got you where it hurts, as evident from your post. I was born and raised in Brooklyn and so were my parents, anybody is welcomed to Brooklyn as long as they are not a bigot or racist, we got our own trash here to take care of, we don't need additional imports from VA at this time. I am willing to sponsor a one-way ticket for this women.

There's an Appalachian section of Brooklyn?

Who knew?

are there any other gothamist posts you comment on or is it just strictly ms. brodigan's?

petition away and eff plum TV, that's my petition.

100 comments by 5!!

her profile is rather pug-ish, no?

They're both idiots, but he was the only idiot with the backing of a union, who also hadn't pasted his face all over the internet with asinine Facebook and Twitter pages.

I had completely forgotten about this crap.

Thanks for making my brain throw up.

+1 for you name

+1 for your comment

Is she still batshit insane?