Yesterday, defense lawyers for Darryl Littlejohn, a bar bouncer accused of murdering a John Jay College student in 2006, rested their case. Yesterday, those lawyers put two police detectives on the stand: One said that while numerous items were taken from Littlejohn's Queens apartment, none "were ever linked to [murder victim Imette] St. Guillen and DNA testing failed to yield a match," while the other said that few items from the bar where Littlejohn worked— and where St. Guillen was last scene—were taken as evidence. Littlejohn's defense has suggested that the police should have paid more attention to bar owner Danny Dorrian. Littlejohn has already been convicted and sentenced to 25 years in the kidnapping of a Queens woman in 2005; he is also suspected in a kidnapping and rape that is very similar to St. Guillen's attack. Closing arguments are expected today and the jury will likely get the case shortly afterward.





I am repulsed that there's any confusion in this case. Someone committed a horrible crime, this young woman and her family are victims, and someone has to pay. Littlejohn's DNA was found on ties around her wrists; he has a history of enjoying hurting women; clearly he played a major role in this. There should be a full investigation into Dorrian until it is 100% clear whether he was involved or not.
You're right about Dorian. His behavior is suspicious and Littlejohn probably has something on him.
This guy either has really bad karma or he's a creep. Definitely a creep, lock him up for life.
Sometimes guilty until innocent works better. There should be no doubt that this guy is bad news, circumstantial evidence or not.
fuck the lawyers