Are Queens and Kerouac getting overlooked by the Landmarks Preservation Commission? Preservationists are making some noise about the Ozone Park walk-up where Jack Kerouac started On the Road. He lived with his parents at the 133-01 Cross Bay Blvd home starting in 1943, after being let out of a Navy psychiatric ward with an "Honorable Discharge With Indifferent Character." The apartment is something locals would like to see preserved and honored, and this Sunday the Queens Historical Society will run a guided trolley tour past not only the home, but seven other sites.
The Daily News reports that it's "Kerouac scholar Patrick Fenton, who will lecture Sunday about how the author's work was shaped by living in Ozone Park during the 1940s," that is questioning the city for not landmarking the site. He told the paper, "They don't really know the history of Jack Kerouac in Queens. If they knew it, I think they'd run to his house to put a plaque up."
In 1950, after his father died, Kerouac and his mother moved to an apartment in Richmond Hill, Queens. A place that Allen Ginsberg once described as a "brown, gloomy house, lamp in his room. I remember old, wooden banister leading up to his room on the second floor, a window that faced the street. We used to walk over to the Van Wyck Expressway, which was around the corner. The two of us would stare down at the sunken highway, this bowling alley of cars, and Jack would talk about how he thought that it was terrible that they could run a highway like this through a neighborhood and ruin it."
Learn more about Kerouac's Queens here and here (more details on Sunday's tour at the bottom of this page). And forget McSorley's, Harmony Bar, White Horse and Cedar Tavern, head over to Glen Patrick’s, which used to be McNulty’s Tavern, "a second home for Kerouac who used to drink there with friends like Ginsberg and Cassady."





I hope they do something about this.
His writing was shaped by living in Ozone Park in the 40s? If he had lived there in the 80s he would have written Goodfellas.
not really influenced by ozone park, IMO. the reason why is youthful writing is so fantastic is because he never let grass grow beneath his feet. as soon as he settled down he became a drunk ass right-wing nut job and disowned many of his former "beat" friends.
Maybe I'm missing it, but I don't see anything on QHS's site about the tour this Sunday.
I generally support preservation.. but what is the endgame here? Does every famous artist's home need to be landmarked?
Yeah, douche, like Nathaniel Hawthorne, or Poe, this writer deserves his due. What are we if we don't recognize our cultural greats?
My question, asshole, is where does that recognition stop? If you landmark this apartment, what about the Richmond Hill one? Where is the line drawn with respect to which authors get preserved and which authors don't?
Simple, shitbag, the landmarks that most inspired their most important works should be protected and all others should be identified and recognized. There's over 120 million dwellings in the US, I think a few can be set aside for recognition.
Oh, and more direct to your question, the line gets drawn wherever you live or have lived. No need for any special merit there.
I always thought the "Beats" are highly overrated. Their only influence I can see in today's society is a generation of aimless hipsters and pretentious artist d-bags.
Hm. I'm not the biggest Kerouac fan but I do enjoy Ginsberg and Burroughs, and honestly I don't see today's hipsters as having much to do with the beats other than coopting the word hipster from them.