Quantcast

UES Starbucks Blast Seems Unrelated to Consulate Bombings

2009_05_starbbl.jpg The Post reports that investigators doubt Monday's explosion outside an Upper East Side Starbucks is related to the bombings outside the British and Mexican Consulates as well as the Times Square recruiting station. Apparently the "make-up of the bomb -- flash powder stuffed inside a jumbo pill jar -- was not similar to the ones used for the earlier bombings," and the description of the teens seen fleeing the area doesn't match the others bombings' lone bicyclist. The Post adds police are investigating whether the incident is linked to a small explosion at a Starbucks in Providence, RI, but the Seattle coffee company sent us a statement, "We are confident that these two explosions were not linked. Further, though the investigation continues, we actually have no reason to believe that Starbucks specifically was a target for this incident." (Apparently there had been a series of small explosions in plastic bottles in different parts of Providence last year.)

Contact the author of this article or email tips@gothamist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • Think2wice

    French anarchists? The Illuminati? Rowdy teenagers? All of the above?

  • NannyState

    Situationists. Classic profile.

  • JacqueMehoff

    where does one get flash powder? it would take bricks and bricks of unraveling firecrackers to fill a RX bottle.

    still nothing to see here, move along.

  • hotstepper

    move it along. nothing to see here.

  • timThompson

    I blame Chuck Palahniuk.

  • Huffy6241

    Imagine how many papers would sell if the explosion happened on 91st and 1st...

  • whatsthatnow

    why's that?

  • drewo

    But putting "bomb" in the headlines sells newspapers.

  • FrankMartin



    Are you trying for dumbest comment of the week.



    First headlines are supposed to grab your attention and sell papers



    Second, it was a bomb.



    What should the headline read, "window and bench break at UES starbucks"

  • drewo
    First headlines are supposed to grab your attention and sell papers
    By routinely distorting and stretching the truth. You don't have to believe the headlines.

    Second, it was a bomb.
    And each 4th of July, do folks light off "bombs" in their backyards? Or do we have other names for those kinds of small explosives? Like the kind used at the Starbucks.
  • FrankMartin



    A "bomb" is an "explosive weapon". A "weapon" is a device used for offense or defense. So the intent to do damage with an explosive weapon makes the word bomb accurate. Dad and his fireworks aren't out to break windows or create mayhem. They are for entertainment. So we do have other names, fireworks, firecrackers, bottle rockets, roman candles.



    So if the startbucks were damaged by 10 M-80s taped together and set off at once it isn't fireworks anymore it is a homemade bomb.



    And yes, you don't have to believe everything you read in a headline. But, do you read everything you believe.

  • r1b2

    Just some punk kids, blowing up the neighborhood again.

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@gothamist.com