Earlier this week, a former squat, the Bullet Space at 292 East 3rd Street in the East Village, was turned over to its residents. Or, as the NY Post puts it, "Nearly 30 years after an eclectic group of poets, performers, anarchists and artists illegally occupied a burned-out East Village tenement, they've officially become a Manhattan co-op."
Back in the 1980s, many damaged buildings were abandoned by owners; enter the squatters, who then worked to make the buildings more habitable and stayed. In 2002, the city sold 11 buildings to Urban Homesteading Assistance Board for $1 each; the Villager explains, "Under the agreement, the squatters, with UHAB’s guidance, would bring their buildings up to code within one year, then buy them — for just $250 per apartment — and the buildings would become permanently affordable, Housing Development Fund Corporation" co-ops. The squatters-turned-legitimate residents also pay $614 in monthly maintenance costs.
Market value for the building is now in the $4-5 million range. While there are some who hate the idea of squatters getting the buildings, the Post reports that one Bullet Space resident "invested significant sweat equity and personal money into the building" and "remembers the days when the toilets were 'bucket flush' and heat came from wood stoves fueled by flammable objects hauled in from the streets." And some squatters aren't thrilled with UHAB: One building is suing UHAB over mishandling finances while others are upset with the restrictions on selling the units. According to the Villager, restrictions would force one resident to sell his unit at a building on East 7th Street for less than $150,000—and the resident says he's put in $150,000 of renovations into the 4.5 room apartment.





Upset over the 150k limit?
Aww poor baby.
He shouldn't have the right to sell it anyway- what possessed him to put that kind of money into it? He should thank the city he will be able to recoup his money at all.
Now that they are bourgeois homeowners, they have become their own worst nightmare. There goes the neighborhood.
And exactly how much in real estate taxes has these assholes paid to the city in the last gazillion years and now have a tax abatement for another gazillion years.
Like these people saved the neighborhood from becoming a slum?
"an eclectic group of poets, performers, anarchists and artists..." Just great! Other than dope smugglers prostitutes, gang bangers, illegal aliens and wannabee
rap singers I can't imagine who else I would want as my neighbors.
Insert joke about Staten Island here.
There once was a quido from Staten Island
his father told him to move to Long Island
the mother's hair was blond
found that gel made her son's hair stand up
(OK so the last line didn't rhyme, sorry)
And she moved back to Richmond on Staten Island
Without the old man's tanning salon franchise
End of the ditty and poem
"an eclectic group of poets, performers, anarchists and artists..." Just great! Other than dope smugglers prostitutes, gang bangers, illegal aliens and wannabee
rap singers I can't imagine who else I would want as my neighbors. >>>
I know right! Artists and poets SUCK SO BAD.
the resident says he's put in $150,000 of renovations
And how much money did this resident spend to buy the unit? Zero. I thought so.
I did my 3,400 square foot loft over twice and I would be hard pressed to say I spent more than $75,000 out of my own pocket. I'm not talking sweat equity, but actual dollars.
A 4.5 room apartment in one of these LES rat houses can't be more than 1000 square feet. Seeing the guy probably wasn't earning diddly squat his hourly wage would be south of $5 and hour.
Estimated costs for renovation $4,000 to $9,000.
You didn't figure in the cost of 25 Watt light bulbs.
The city took over more than 100,000 units of housing in the 70s. Most of that was sold for a song to real estate developers who then received public subsidies in the form of tax breaks and tax exempt financing to give them a profit incentive to rebuild neighborhoods that had been abandoned. I imagine they profitted nicely.
The real estate industry in New York is both very profitable and highly subsidized. I haven't seen the Post give front page treatment to millionaire developers getting millions of public subsidies to boost their balance sheets.
A handful of squatters, as opposed to wealthy developers, got a break and a return on their investment. More power to them. What's not mentioned in the Post article is that the co-op is an HDFC, meaning it's been preserved as low to moderate income housing and the new owners can't simply cash out at market rate.
It's sound public policy and turns residents into owners and stakeholders which is certainly as reasonable as subsidizing rental units which primarily benefits landlords and developers.
nyc should stop subsidizing everyone on housing. they should just give poor folks a check, let them spend it on where they want to rent.
this way slumlords would be the thing of the past.
Give poor folks a check?
Dude, that is the most irresponsible thing i've ever read on gothamist.
Give them a job, MTA should look into revamping their hiring process. These rat houses squatters could probably swab the deck of a 4 train better than anyone else.
Agree. That money would go to Colt45 and Kools in a NY minute.
People are generally against subsidies when they recognize them as such. As you go up the economic ladder subsidies are delivered through the tax code whereas at the bottom of the economic ladder subsidies are in cash. It's easy to criticize a policy that gives cash to someone you might think is undeserving, but government is really a subsidy machine. That tax deduction for home mortgage is a subsidy as is a guaranteed student loan.
No one truly believes in the free market, you won't see corporations or developers or home owners saying "no I refuse this tax break because it's really a subsidy and a manipulation of the market." But if the government gave away cash instead of tax breaks then people would scream bloody murder--even if the balance sheets looked exactly the same.