Yesterday, the Daily News reported that the Port Authority may consider to scrap three of the planned towers—Towers 2, 3 and 5— at the World Trade Center site, due to costs, delays and the economic downturn. Now the Post throws out the idea that the PA may actually opt for building luxury hotel and apartments at Tower 5, which seems "a stronger bet than holding out for a commercial tenant, now that JP Morgan is out of the picture." And Globe St. suggests that the PA only wants to delay Tower 2 and 3 construction until the real estate market is better (and needs millions more square feet). The PA and WTC developer Larry Silverstein have been at odds over Ground Zero plans, with the developer asking for more financial help and the PA unwilling (thus far) to pitch in any more. Silverstein Properties president of WTC properties Janno Lieber said, "The Silverstein team has not wavered on rebuilding the World Trade Center, and we never will." [Via Curbed]





Sounds like a great idea; what possible reason would people have not to want to live in this building?
Luxury housing is slightly better than more commercial space for that area-- read "A NEW DEAL FOR NEW YORK" by Mike Wallace to see what I mean.
But really, as Wallace argues eloquently, what downtown needs is more affordable and middle-income housing.
New Yorkers need more park space. Just witness how most of the city's green spaces were packed out over this past weekend with the first hint of nice weather.
There's enough empty glass residential or business towers as it is.