Quantcast

Bike Lane Backlash on Grand Street: Councilman Blasts DOT

It's been a while since we checked in on community dissatisfaction with the DOT's changes to Grand Street in Manhattan, and we're not surprised to see the opposition still hates the new configuration, which provides a dedicated lane for cyclists, separated from traffic by a row of parked cars and pedestrian islands at some intersections. On Monday night City Councilmember Alan Gerson held a public forum on traffic and parking problems in the neighborhood, and accused the DOT of turning "a deaf ear to community concerns. Traffic on Grand Street is worse. Pedestrian crossings are more dangerous. Critical turns for the Fire Department, ambulances and police have become difficult."

You'll recall that last December the Soho Alliance sent us a video depicting a truck driver who got stuck turning from West Broadway onto Grand Street because he mistook the parked cars for idling traffic. Business owners along Grand Street say the bike lanes have made truck deliveries onerous, and one building manager says, "I’ve seen fire engines tied up at Pitt Street." And then there are those cyclists. The Villager reports that forum attendees complained about reckless bike riders along the Grand Street lane, and one resident declared, "It’s time the city licensed bikes so they can track offenders."

Gerson and others want the DOT to consider revising the traffic configuration, and though a compromise is being hammered out over the controversial Kent Ave bike lane in Williamsburg, it's unclear what the DOT will do to appease Grand Street opponents. Asked about the ongoing objections, Wiley Norvell at Transportation Alternatives tells us, "When it comes to traffic afflictions, downtown has it all, from thousands of illegally parked government vehicles, to trucks, to bridge and tunnel congestion. One of the best ways to untangle that morass is to make biking and walking safer, and bike lanes and pedestrian refuges are doing just that." According to The Lo-Down, Gerson says he'll hold another town hall meeting on May 19th.

Contact the author of this article or email tips@gothamist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • Noah Sussman

    I live just off Grand Street at Mulberry, and I can tell you that traffic was a mess well before the lane. The spillover from Ferrara alone is enough to snarl traffic on many nights. Not to mention that there are always limousines and tour buses stopping or double parked on Grand all night every night. Many evenings its all I can do to maneuver my bike through the morass of stalled cars.



    What I have noticed changing since the bike lane, though, is that the Little Italy merchants are becoming increasingly hostile to cyclists. It's now gotten to the point that I now feel uncomfortable walking my bike into my own building. I've been sneered at or outright castigated by restaurant staff several times for walking my bike on Mulberry street, despite the fact that I literally have no other choice: it's a one way street and cars are allowed to park on both sides.



    Bloomberg, the bike lanes are a big step in the right direction, but as a city and as a culture, we still have a long way to go.

  • andrew2000

    The bike lane is great! I use it to commute to work and no longer have to fear for my life when riding on Grand Street. I think that there is a small minority of businesses and residents complaining here and they are receiving too much coverage. If anything I frequent local businesses more because of the lane.



    thats a good traffic reform from Mr. Gerson.



    visit his other reforms : http://www.gerson2009.com/main.cfm?actionId=globalShowStaticContent&screenKey=cmpContent&htmlKey=issues&s=gerson



    vote for Mr.Gerson for district 1 council election!!!!!

  • Snoopy

    "It’s time the city licensed bikes so they can track offenders." Great idea. Let's see, $100 a bike per year time 1,000 bikes equals a $100,000 plus fines for bikes not properly "parked" at $25 per. Oops plus $30 for bike riding license. We are starting to talk some serious money here gang.

  • Gwinny

    More hilarity in this article:



    http://www.thelodownny.com/leslog/2009/05/followup-transportation-town-hall.html



    Of course, Streetsblog (yeah, I know) actually looked up the truth:



    A quick CrashStat check reveals that, contrary to Mr. Jacob's gut assertion, several people have been killed by autos while walking on Grand Street in recent years.

  • bklynbagel

    Bike lanes dont create traffic, cars create traffic. When people break the law, they should be ticketed. We don't have to have registrations for our bikes but a cyclist should be held responsible for their actions much like a driver. It goes both ways.

  • whitecastlerock

    There needs to be mandatory registration for assholes in this city... Break the law (subject to City Council Approval of course) three times and you are gone—off to Phoenix or Sacramento. There will be plenty of room for cars and bikes once all of the assholes are gone. Until that happens we must share space with too many assholes.

  • Headzo

    How do bike lanes make this city more like the suburbs?

    Last time I checked, Portland and Amsterdam are not suburbs, they are cities.



    People who insist on driving everywhere are what makes this city more like the suburbs.

  • yeah ! thats right - Take the f@#&*%! Train. Or move to Florida- drive to the bathroom & get Fat like everyone there.

  • thefacts

    Let's face it. You have a DOT hijacked by Transportation Alternatives, a group of cycling fanatics who disdain not only motorists, but even us pedestrians who get in their way.



    It doesn't help that the DOT Diktator Sadik-Khan rides a bike for photo ops but hypocritically uses a limo paid by taxpayers to chauffeur her around the rest of the time.



    Further DOT hypocrisy is evidenced when DOT limits street parking for the rest of NY but has Reserved Parking spaces for its employees. We ride the subway; they drive. What a bunch of phonies.



    Most of the TransAlt fanatics are newbies to Gotham who want to turn the Greatest City in the World to the suburbia they fled from. NY ain't Portland! You want to emulate Amsterdam? Then move there.



    When will Bloomberg listen to the pleas of the besieged neighborhood residents and businesses that are harmed by Czar Sadik-Khan's looney experiments and dump this hippy and her Spandex Nazis?





  • UnrepentantFenian

    Transportation Alternatives is a radical fundamentalist organization and should be regarded as such. The DOT entertaining their rhetoric is akin to negotiating with terrorists.

  • babyhitler

    What the hell? Cars get 99.99% of all the roads and we get like 5 bike lanes on some streets and car owners complain about that? It's like a white plantation owner complaining that slaves get too much water to drink.

  • drewo
    Most of the TransAlt fanatics are newbies to Gotham who want to turn the Greatest City in the World to the suburbia they fled from.

    Yeah, because nobody drives cars in suburbia, they all ride bicycles.
  • hard times

    lol what are you even talking about? you can't expect people to take you seriously with that kind of sensationalism, contradictory logic, etc.



    I respect your point of view that some of the DOT might be catering too directly to bikes, but you've gotta relax. Heck, I ride a bike a lot and I might even agree with you - especially about the hypocrisy of the agency.



    I don't really give a shit about most bike lanes, either; they don't solve the real problems we have.

  • RatherBeBiking

    Never. Now bend over, the DOT Nazis have plans for a class 2 buffered bike lane right up your asshole.

  • RatherBeBiking

    If you check out Sean S's youtube videos of traffic issues along the Grand Street bike lane, you will see that many of them are cause by vehicles illegally parked in the buffer zone for the lane near intersections. This makes turning for longer vehicles more difficult. If tickets were handed out more quickly for blocking the buffer at the start of the street, less tie ups would occur.

  • hard times

    this is exactly right. and babyhitler's point stands, as well.



    why not start with more enforcement of the existing safety rules? Keeping cars out of No Parking areas would be a good place to start.

  • JacqueMehoff

    it's much easier for a bicyclist to get out of the way of an emergency vehicle than a parked car with no driver to be seen.

    don't they ban cars on Grand in the summer months or was that Mulberry. so banning cars has been done before.

    Pitt Street????? that's old school LES.

  • fishfryin

    as a cyclist myself i can admit that some of us are definitely assholes. can drivers please just admit the same thing?



    on another note, i am curious to see if the city will one day do something revolutionary and simply close a street like grand to traffic expect deliveries and such things before 8am and after 6pm. just an idea

  • drewo

    Closing a street to cars? That be crazy talk! Civilizations will crumble!



    Or people will quickly realize it's no big deal at all. As has been the case in many European cities for a long time now.

  • babyhitler

    one solution is just to ban cars on grand street. They complain about how hard it is to move a fire truck. Guess what? when they were illegally double parking daily before the bike lane it was hard to move a fire truck. suck some eggs.

  • imadick

    license bike riders, mandatory registration of bikes.





    you know, because that will make motor vehicular traffic way better.

  • hard times

    exactly. they ought to start with substantial penalties for the drivers who are actually makings things less safe.

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@gothamist.com