Quantcast

Ch-ch-ch-changes: New York in 1961 and 2009

Not too long ago we took a look at one Harlem storefront as it changed throughout the decades, starting out a cocktail lounge and currently vacant after a brief stint as a Sleepy's. Now Paul Sahner over at NYC Grid has a new photo project up where he compares New York spots in 1961 to their 2009 counterparts. He tells us, "I recently came across a handful of photos my grandfather shots while in NY in 1961. I decided to go out and attempt to re-shot his original photos in 2009."

Contact the author of this article or email tips@gothamist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • dbc

    Traffic is going both ways on 5th in the first pic. What's a "public shelter"? Fallout shelter?

  • famdoc

    Paul Sahner has way too much time on his hands.

    Anyway, thanks.

    BTW, there is a cell phone in that '61 photo on Fifth Ave.

    Very creepy.

  • GoToHell

    I am amazed at how filthy the facades of Rockefeller Center were in 1961.

  • neonwattagelimit

    Biggest difference I noticed, aside from styles, is that the streets in 1961 look less cluttered. Fewer traffic signs, advertisements, kiosks, etc. Plus, the streets generally don't seem to have bright lane markers, and the traffic lights are not hanging over the intersections, so they blend in more.



    I have no opinion as to which way is better or worse, I just think it's worth noting.

  • virgilstarkwell

    i was just at 5th Avenue and 50th Street today and i think those construction barricades are still there.



    ba-dump, bump.

  • Trilby16

    People in their 20s used to look middle-aged.



    And people back then did not hold objects up to their faces while smiling in blissful vapidity and ignoring their surroundings. Weird!

  • Guest

    Yeah they did. They were called cigarettes.

  • schizofriendly

    Hark back to the sidewalks of a different New York; a New York where middle-aged people outnumbered people in their 20's...

  • fugothamist

    yeah that's what is most noticeable to me



    its been a change for the worse imo

  • Bluealways

    Considering 1961 was the Space Age, I feel like the fur-clad people back then would be completely disappointed with how similar everything looks almost half a century later.



    Obviously there have significant technological and social changes since then, but based on photos alone it looks like the only differences are fewer hats and different garbage cans.

  • Think2wice

    First they'll desperately fumble for a Camel cigarette when they hear we have a Negro president. Then when they've chillaxed they'll be disappointed at the lack of flying cars and Moon bases.

  • Think2wice

    Pic #7 is the saddest of them all. No more "bishop's crook" lampost, no pre-war building on the corner, and no more 71st Regiment Armory.

  • RevWaldo

    The funny thing is: In my nondescript section of Brooklyn they're replacing some of the "War of The Worlds" lampposts with "bishop's crook"s. (It also got carpet-bombed with bike racks, but that's another story.)

  • zpk

    No doubt about it. The 60's were a lot more photogenic.

  • Brainwash

    Ha ha ha! People used to wear clothing!

  • Think2wice

    Men wore hats and ladies wore gloves. Why?...♪Traditioooon, tradition♪

  • Here's one I did of the now condemned Windermere apartment building on the corner of 9th Avenue at 57th Street: http://www.flickr.com/photos/edstern/49477881

  • Qraymond

    I love projects like this.



    Q

  • pete

    I see whities that need to be skinned of their fur.

  • Politburo

    If only there was a technology that allowed you to switch photos without reloading the page.....

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@gothamist.com