Quantcast

City And State Discuss Gowanus Canal Cleanup

04092gowanuscanal.jpg City and State were at odds last night at a public forum held in Carroll Gardens regarding the cleanup of the Gowanus Canal. It's being reported that the Bloomberg Administration is "opposing a proposal by the federal Environmental Protection Agency to add Brooklyn’s Gowanus Canal to the agency’s list of Superfund sites, arguing that the designation could jeopardize planned development for the area and the city’s own cleanup efforts." Daniel Walsh, director of the Mayor's Office of Environmental Remediation, noted that "Of the 1,500 federal Superfund sites to date, no river cleanup has been successfully completed." Because the Superfund solution would require finding responsible parties for past contamination, the city fears that the effort would take up to 20 years, "putting at risk more than $400 million of private investment already committed to the area for housing and other development," as well as the city's own cleanup efforts. The E.P.A. officials will make a final decision following a 60-day public comment scheduled to end June 6th.

Contact the author of this article or email tips@gothamist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • Politburo

    SARA does not require finding a responsible party. If a RP is not found, the fund can be used.

    Also, listing would allow the city or any developer to sue PRPs to recover monies used for cleanup.

    There is really no rational reason not to list a site on the NPL.

  • Bluealways

    The Superfund status will really ruin the Gowanus Canal's reputation for being a healthy and pristine oasis.

  • NannyState

    It ain't getting any prettier, just do it.

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@gothamist.com