Quantcast

Bloomberg's Controversial Phone Survey Targets Weiner

040709phone.jpg Mayor Bloomberg may be enjoying a comfortable lead in the polls, but that $80 million he plans to drop on his re-election campaign isn't going to spend itself. As Susan Lerner, executive director of Common Cause, tells the Times, "If you have too much money in your campaign, you don’t use it productively. He’s hired so many consultants who are looking for something to do." Like annoy New Yorkers with a telephone survey spreading innuendo about likely Democratic rival Anthony Weiner! The practice, known as "push-polling," is described by one of Weiner's advisers as, "one of the most discredited and dishonorable forms of negative campaigning."

In this case, voters who participated in the survey last month were asked questions designed to raise doubts about Weiner, including vague queries about his "association with European models." That question was a suggestive reference to Weiner's proposal to help foreign fashion models get work visas more easily. But Bloomerg's campaign spokesman Howard Wolfson (yep, he's baaack) tells the Times, "Unfortunately for Congressman Weiner, the fact that he takes money from lobbyists and special interests, misses votes and has not passed any significant legislation isn’t a push poll — it’s his record."

But former pollster Peter Feld says that while the survey may be negative, the calls didn’t go to nearly enough voters to make an impact. Rather, the questions were likely intended to gauge the potential effectiveness of negative messages. If so, Jeff Goldsmith, an undecided voter from Queens who got the call, has some feedback: "By the time I was through the entire poll, I thought it was ridiculous."

Contact the author of this article or email tips@gothamist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • You've got this (and what I said) wrong. These were not push-polls, which are designed to spread information. Nor were they designed to gauge the public's threshold for negative campaigning (which, by the way, is much higher than you might think), as you quote me saying.



    They were designed to test the effectiveness of various negative messages that might be used in the future; i.e., to see which attacks work best and plan negative ads. In other words, the poll was to collect information from a relatively small random sample, not to spread information to a large number of people.

  • Thanks for your comment. We're revising that line to better reflect your statement.

  • jaycjay

    Heh. Welcome to Gothamist, Mr. Feld, where the summaries in the posts only occasionally provide an accurate account of what's said in the linked articles they're drawn from. It's a good source of links to several related stories from different news sources, but most of us have learned that you have to follow the links to actually get the story.

  • Now I'm upset I screen my calls.

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@gothamist.com