Starchitect Frank Gehry really stepped in it during a recent interview with industry journal The Architect's Newspaper, admitting he doesn't think developer Bruce Ratner's $4.2 billion plan to build a Nets basketball arena, office towers and thousands of apartments in Brooklyn will become a reality. In an interview on the occasion of his 80th birthday, Gehry dropped the bombshell when asked about unrealized commissions he most wishes had been built: "The Corcoran Gallery in DC, the Atlantic Yards project in Brooklyn—I don’t think it’s going to happen."
Gehry's team has designed and redesigned the basketball arena and other buildings as the project has spun its wheels under the weight of enormous community opposition, lawsuits, and, now, a foundering economy. In November, it was learned that Gehry quietly dismissed more than two dozen staffers working on fresh designs, then Ratner stopped all work while fending off lawsuits, one of which (a challenge to the development's use of eminent domain) is still winding its way through the courts.
Ratner has enlisted different architects to redesign the $950 million stadium at a lower price point, but the next question, according to Develop Don’t Destroy Brooklyn spokesman Daniel Goldstein, is, "Will Barclays pay $400 million for the naming-rights for a cookie-cutter concrete box rather than a landmark, Frank Gehry arena? They signed on for a Gehry arena, so it's very doubtful." But Ratner is keeping up a brave face; in a statement sent out last night, he deemed Gehry's doubts "understandable," and even acknowledged that "others have concerns about this project happening in the worst economic environment since the Great Depression." But excelsior! Ratner insists, "Atlantic Yards will get built."
And earlier this week Mayor Bloomberg also expressed confidence in the project's future, telling reporters, "It would be sad if Atlantic Yards gets built without the Gehry design, which would've been phenomenal for this city. I gather at this point it looks like that the only ways Ratner's going to get that done is to do it at a lower cost and not to do everything at the same time." As for Gehry, he's subsequently backpedaled on his comment, saying it was "misconstrued as a prediction," and that he remains "hopeful it will come to fruition."





I'm surprised Gehry didn't explain his remarks by saying, "I'm 80! I say weird stuff all the time!"
He's supposed to say, "I'm 80! I'm half blind and mostly senile and can't draw a straight line to save my life, which is why my designs look the way they do.
ha!
Thank god!
All I know is that if the pic is accurate it'd be ugly as hell, so I'm glad it won't happen.
Hopefully he is right, as it would spare the world of some of his ugly poorly designed maintenance headache buildings!
Let's hope Gehry's right and this abomination never sees the light of day. It's disgraceful that eminent domain is being abused in this way and that the decent working people of Brooklyn have to fight their way through the courts to have their property rights respected.
It's over for this hideous pile of Bilbao.
Yes, score one for the residents of middle brooklyn. Now they can look at undeveloped land and criminals for years to come. It's the 70's all over again.
The city used eminent domain for the property once before, so they can use it again to take it away from Ratner to sell it to developers who'll actually get something built there. In fact, it should be cheaper this time because the pit has less fair market value than the buildings that once sat there.