Quantcast

Woody Allen's Watchmen

0309woodywatchmen.jpg Watchmen hasn't been getting the best reviews, but Slate thinks it could be worse. What if Woody Allen directed it! Allen's would be set on the UWS, of course, and the site imagines a romantic comedy "where wealthy dermatologist Dr. Herbert Manhattan (Allen) suffers a freak accident with his dermabrasion machine. How will his blue skin and omnipotence affect his relationship with beautiful but scatterbrained silk importer Laurie Juspeczyk (Scarlett Johansson)?" Other what-if scenarios include the bromance-obsessed Judd Apatow, Quentin Tarantino, Tyler Perry, Sofia Coppola and Pedro Almodóvar—but who else would(n't) you like to see reinterpret it? How about a Danny Boyle and Loveleen Tandan directed Bollywood take on the comic? A Dr. Mumbai dance number may be just what this movie needs.

Contact the author of this article or email tips@gothamist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • ComicsRMe

    i really enjoyed the movie, but i never read any of the comics. definitely thought the opening credits deserved the best review though. they should have used them for trailers instead of the ones they used. i saw a video that gave a lot of perspectives on the movie.

  • babyhitler

    saw it. I'd give it a 4/4 for a comic movie adaption cause the source material was so hard to transfer over but a 2.5 as a standalone movie. If you didn't read the comic it would have been hard to understand. Hell, i've re-read the watchmen 5 times already and I'm still amazed at how much I've missed. I just realized that that when Rorshcach was younger he wrote a school report stating that he thought dropping the bomb on japan was good for mankind cause it saved a lot of lives but when he was older he reversed that policy. Gives him a new dimension. The only bad parts of the movie were the obvious music cues like ride of the valkyries in vietnam and Malin akerman not being dramatic enough for the dramatic parts. She was supposed to be ditzy for the most part though so that was good. Also, not enough dead bodies at the end for the emotional resonance of the comic.

  • ANGRYGOD11

    SPOILER ALERT



    ALWAYS WARN THE READERS WHO DIDN'T SEE THE FILM, YET



    The director decided it's too soon after 9/11 to show dead bodies on the streets.

  • Rocknrope

    You know how I know you're gay? Instead of a costume, you painted yourself blue and prance around with your dong out.

  • Felix Hoenikker

    Rock out with your tachyons out!

  • PKMKII
  • FunChop

    I saw the Watchmen on Saturday, I'd give it two out of four stars at best. It's really too bad because the actual graphic novel is brilliant. The adaptation failed miserably presumably because Alan Moore wasn't involved. Alan Moore's comment from Wikipedia:



    My book is a comic book. Not a movie, not a novel. A comic book. It's been made in a certain way, and designed to be read a certain way: in an armchair, nice and cozy next to a fire, with a steaming cup of coffee."

  • Guest

    You have to take that with a grain of salt. Alan Moore doesn't like any adaptation of his movies, and V for Vendetta was brilliant.

  • Guest

    That should have said, "any movie adaptation of his work."

  • In other Watchmen news, here's the opening credit sequence of the movie, which is reportedly the best part of the film.

  • Felix Hoenikker

    Thanks for that link!

  • See, I'm not trying to gaslight you.

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@gothamist.com