Spitzer Call Girl Coughs Up Details on Rough Role-Playing

2009_03_spitzersad.jpg As the one year anniversary of the Eliot Spitzer scandal pulls near, the Daily News ties up one of its loose ends and gets some kinky details from an escort who claims that she was sent to the former governor. "Annie" opens up to Rush & Molloy about Spitzer's desire to play rough with her. She tells them:

He wanted a scenario where I was supposed to say I had just been to a self-defense class. He was supposed to respond, 'Let's see if you learned anything. He would be aggressive. I would have to defend myself...I don't remember any kissing or tenderness. He wanted to get on with the role-play. He put his clothes neatly to the side, folding his pants. Yes, he did leave his socks on...I was never fully undressed. He was naked. He was perspiring a lot. He was holding me down. He pinned me to the bed. That didn't bother me. But when he grabbed my throat, that was too much. I remember trying to push myself up off the bed, which made him apply more pressure. I've never been worried about my safety, but I was really concerned...Finally, I pushed him away and got up. He hadn't finished. But I'd had enough. I don't think he was planning on really hurting me. He didn't ask if I was all right. He didn't appear to be mad, either...As he was leaving, he gave me a tip."

Annie says that she was working for famous madam Kristin Davis and that the encounter took place back when Spitzer was state attorney general. The escort also claims to have been with another state's current governor, but was not spilling the beans oh which.

A lawyer for Spitzer told the News that the account was "outrageous and defamatory." Meanwhile, the former governor has made headlines for his current activities lately with the announcement that he is venturing into the commercial real estate business with the purchase of an office building in Washington DC. The building stands just across the street from the Mayflower Hotel, where Spitzer's demise began last year.

Email This Entry


Comments (22) [rss]

I think you meant "Ew ew ewwwww."

user-pic

While Spitzer is clearly a sleaze and has little shame, to give such credence to "Annie's" account to a bunch of gossip columnists in the Daily News seems to be a bit much.

user-pic

Not too sound too harsh, but why do we care what a whore has to say? And why does she feel like she can say it publicly? Does she think we are going to respect her now? She's a self identified skank and should be shunned as one.

Don't hold back. These women are not sad little hookers working a corner to keep food in their baby's tummy or anything. They were paid hundreds of thousands of dollars that were never reported as income and live in McMansions in NJ.

user-pic

Shame died sometime in the 1960s.

The attention and flattery that the media pays these women and the other whores in the porn industry makes it a growing industry. The more girls are exposed to this, and the more they see the fame and money, the more they think that there is nothing wrong with that type of business.

This country is too uptight when it comes to sex.

Any guesses on the 'other' gov?

At the very least, Eliot deserves his $1k/hr back from this one for the loose lips.

Perhaps E - L - I - O - T was just auditioning like GEORGE COSTANZA to be a 'LATEX SALESMAN' with whips/handcuffs??? JUST THINK HE COULD HAVE BEEN NY's SENATURD.

When are these low life hookers going to shut up? He has a wife and two girls that have to listen to all of this garbage.

Granted this is all Spitzer's fault, but adding salt to the wound isn't helping.

Why is everyone coming down against the whores and sticking up for Eliot? I have nothing against whores, I think many of them has as much integrity as any public official these days anyway. I think this is funny and exactly what Eliot deserves, public shaming (and I only say that because he was such a self-styled sanctimous anti-crime crusader with seemingly little mercy), I don't think every garden variety whoremonger should be publicly shamed. If its not true I'm sure he has the ability to seek legal redress.

Yeah, these self-righteous men condemn prostitutes but likely expect to get laid after buying a girl a dinner.

Give a woman a $1000 cash and she's a 'whore'. Give her a $1000 diamond ring and that is all called romance.

Hypocrisy.

I totally agree.
But I still think that hooker should not talk publicly about some guy's sexual preferences. It's just bad manners.

I agree she did break the purveyor-client code but based on the public figure involved and the fact that the general facts of his whoring are also very public I will make an exception in this particular case and not hold it against her.

I started to read the article and got so disgusted by the uber-detailed & completely unnecessary description of the "services" provided by this prostitute that I simply skipped the rest.

I understand most of you are perverts who dwell on this kind of crap, but please consider the fact that not ALL Gothamist readers are war criminal, mortgage fraudster degenerates who need to know the most intricate & lurid details of the interplay between Americans and their beloved prostitutes.

UNLESS of course you're willing to expose the details of just how exactly Wall St pulled-off the feat of azz-FVKKING 300 million Americans...

What makes this story so pathetic is the near absence of kinky sexual acrobatics. For the money that sweaty schlub paid, I would have expected something about a trapeze, leather skis, and a monkey named "Tambo". The whole "self-defense class" scenario is about as tired as the 'cigar and a cheap blue dress'. Lack of imagination may have doomed Spitzer as much as any salacious scandal-mongering.

Aside form his other governmental difficulties, and the fact that the Pro should have just let this go and not blabbed details (seeing as how he is no longer "famous"), Is there any chance those of us prurient news-browswers who read this could gather together to file a class action suit against Spitz & the Pro for mental anguish & loss of consortium? I think, just on the visual flashes from the descrip, I'm off the sex train for at least a few weeks. Uggghhh! And the socks! Aside from the fact of him being boring & unimaginative. Pro, you really earned your pay on that gig. Luckily you weren't physically harmed.

If this is what Spitzer wanted, let's face the fact he was never going to get this at home.

If this is true (which I doubt) who does it say more about?
Why come out with it now?
This story stinks.
At the least, once you're charging by the hour complaining about your clients is a joke.

a hooker... acting unscrupulously and without taste? a politician who did the same? zounds!

no one will ever shut up when there is money to be made...

Post a comment (Comment Policy)

Tips

Get your daily dose of New York first thing in the morning from our weekday newsletter, now in beta.

About Gothamist

Gothamist is a website about New York. More

Editor: Jen Chung
Publisher: Jake Dobkin

Newsmap

newsmap.jpg

Contribute

Latest Tip:

It's the same media that NEVER mentioned Muslims' hatred of Israel as a possible motive for 9/11.
[more]

Latest Photo:

Subscribe

Use an RSS reader to stay up to date with the latest news and posts from Gothamist.

All Our RSS

Follow us