Yesterday's report that Wall Street bonuses fell 44% last year had State Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli bemoaning all the income tax revenue lost by the belt-tightening. But today the Times takes the long view, and points out that those belts weren't really so tight when compared to previous years. Sure, last year's $18.4 billion in bonuses is less than half of the 2007 and 2006 take, but it was still the sixth-largest haul on record. Adjusted for inflation, Wall Street workers took home about as much as in 2004, when the Dow was soaring. (And those figures omit stock options that would push the numbers even higher.) Harvard Professor Lucian Bebchuk tells the Times he's concerned banks might be using taxpayer bailout money to subsidize the bonuses, which definitely calls for an angry torch mob or a sad trombone, take your pick.





WTF? Avg bonus is over $100,000
Well, it's obvious that they are using taxpayer money to pay bonuses because they got taxpayer money AND are giving bonuses. If you ask for Taxpayer money then you should not give bonuses at all. Why reward failure?
If they manage to steal from their clients, their companies and from the taxpayers, aren't we really rewarding success?
i prefer the angry torch mob...that's just me
Angry torch mobs are soooo outta style.
The modern revolutionary nowadays prefers bundling worthless stocks & mortgages into securities packages and then selling them off worldwide to naive investors.
....touche ::tips hat::
Former Merrill Lynch CEO John Thain's defense of bonuses:
"If you don't pay your best people you will destroy your franchise."
Jon Stewart's reply:
"You don't have best people!!"
Daily Show video
Haha, that is the whole circular logic of piggy rich folks - I make a lot of money, because I'm important. I mean, of course I'm important, look at all this money I make!
Right now I'm reading Liar's Poker - it's fairly amusing. Though it is about the bond market of the 80s, it seems directly relevant to what happened in '08.
PAYBACK
We have a suggestion for the Wall Streeter
That’s sure to impel him to phone us:
In light of your company’s vast losses,
How about a negative bonus?
they shouldn't even get a set of steak knives.
aahhh those Republicans and their nutty values!
Not following you.
My wall street buddy is 28. Just laid down a dp on a 1.8 mil apt. He works in derivatives too. Oh well, the party goes on....
Gimme his name & address and I'll see to it he never makes it to 29.
Hey look at me I have a controversial screen name which promotes terrorism and I act tuff on message boards...
rdsizzle is a controversial screen name?
yes - i was a middle child