Quantcast

U.S. Airways Flight 1549 Crashes into Hudson River

Reports are coming in that a plane has crashed in the Hudson River, between Piers 88 and 92 (West 48th-West 52nd Streets; U.S.S. Intrepid is at Pier 86). The newscasts are reporting that it's a US Airways (twin-engine) flight.

Update: Divers are picking up passengers, who are in life rafts. A New York Waterway ferries are on the scene, also trying to help. The plane was reportedly heading from LaGuardia Airport; the plane is floating south. Injuries are unknown at this time; there were over 70 passengers. The flight was US Airways 1549 (from NYC to Charlotte, NC), an Airbus A320, that took off from LGA at 3:11 p.m.

Some reports suggest that a flock of geese hit the plane.

Update: Reports now say the number of passengers are between 140 and 160. A witness says the plane is floating downstream.

So far, it's believed all occupants are out of the plane. A secondary search is being conducted; fire department rescue teams from NJ and other NY are aiding.

A passenger said 1010WINS that the pilot told passengers should brace themselves—the passenger credited the pilot for steering them into the water and he said that they had children and women leave the plane first. The plane has floated down toward 23rd Street.

Update: A man driving on the Henry Hudson now tells 1010 WINS the plane looked very low and that the plane landed in the water—and there was no fire. There were 146 passengers and 5 crew members.

FBI says there's no indication this crash was connected to terrorism.

Update: Reports are that the plane is being towed to Chelsea Piers. And the plane was scheduled to head to Seattle after Charlotte. And a caller told NBC New York, "I saw it hit the river. It just came crashing down into the river. I was wondering why it came down so low; there's no airport around here."

Here's video from MSNBC:

Update: FlightAware shows that Flight 1549 was only in the air for 6 minutes, from 3:26PM to 3:32PM

Update: Bill White, COO of the USS Intrepid Museum, says that about 21 Bank of America employees were on the plane (BoA is an Intrepid sponsor). He said it was a "miracle" that no one was injured and that it was incredible the pilot steered the plane into the water.

According to the FAA, all passengers were evacuated. There are minor injuries to all passengers. The U.S. Army Corp of Engineers is en route with a water crane to retrieve the air craft.

A passenger sitting in seat 22A tells WCBS 2, "About three or four minutes into the flight the left engine just blew, fire and flames came out of it and it just started smelling a lot like gasoline. A couple minutes after that the pilots said we had to brace for a hard impact, and that's when everyone started saying prayers."

Some passengers were taken to hospitals in NY while other are being treated in NJ.

Update 5:11 p.m.: Coast Guard says about 60 passengers were in the water when they were rescued.

Update 5:37 p.m.: Former managing director of the National Transportation Safety Board Peter Goelz tells Bloomberg News, “They’re probably zeroing in on the possibility of a bird strike. That’s what the pilots seem to have reported, and it would explain why they lost both engines at once. You can handle hitting maybe one bird, but not three or four. If you get a flock of Canada geese, you’re going to be in trouble.” And airline consultant (and former Airbus executive) George Hamlin said, "Ditching an aircraft is a significant accomplishment on the part of the pilot, as opposed to crashing one. There’s no place for an airplane of that size to land in Manhattan.

Seventy-eight people were taken to the NY side, 68 people were taken to NJ.

Update 5:51 p.m.: Doug Church, from the air traffic controller's union, tells 1010 WINS that the pilot saw Teterboro Airport from his window while he was over NJ and wanted to land there, but then air traffic control didn't here anymore. The plane was apparently 900 feet over the George Washington Bridge (which is 604 feet).

Update 6:00 p.m.: Mayor Bloomberg and Governor Paterson are addressing the media (also there: Office of Emergency Management Commissioner Joseph Bruno, Manhattan Borough President Scott Stringer, City Council Speaker Christine Quinn, Fire Commissioner Nicholas Scoppetta, Police Commissioner Ray Kelly). Both praised the pilot profusely. Paterson said, "We had a Miracle on 34th Street, now, I believe, we have a Miracle on the Hudson."

2009_01_bloomberg.jpg

Bloomberg said he spoke to the pilot, who said he walked the plane twice to make sure everyone was out. He said that the cause of the crash is being investigated; federal Department of Transportation Secretary Mary Peters and her team is on her way to NYC. He added that there might be some slight variations with the passenger count, because they are trying to get the latest manifest. Also: There was an infant onboard!

2009_01_planedat2.jpg Bloomberg added that the plane is tied up Battery Park City and there's "Absolutely no indication of terrorism." He has no details on the injuries and added that after the pilot and passengers left, two NYPD divers checked the plane.

Update 6:33 p.m.: i'm not sayin', i'm just sayin' mapped the plane's path:

1. It appears the engine trouble occurred between 3:27 pm and 3:28 pm over the Bronx Zoo, where the aircraft, which had been climbing steadily out of LGA to 3,200 feet, suddenly descends to 2,000 feet while still accelerating slightly from 194 knots to 202 knots.

2. The flight path curved inland over the northernmost part of Manhattan - as far East as Harlem River Drive - before the plane curved right to center perfectly over the Hudson. The FAA is reporting that controllers originally suggested a landing at Teterboro Airport in NJ. Maybe the left turn was a momentary adjustment for a Teterboro approach, before the pilot realized that a water landing was the only option?

3. The plane actualy GAINS 100 ft of altitude, from 1,200 to 1,300 feet, one to two minutes after the descent began, while the pilot was centering on the Hudson. News reports are suggesting that all engines were out. Could the plane pull up 100 ft using flaps alone? The altitude data from Flightaware is rounded to 100 feet, so is it possible that the plane was right around 1,250 feet could be explained by rounding errors?

Contact the author of this article or email tips@gothamist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • new yorker

    How about a memorial site to something so sharply executed -with the help of good fortune - All we seem to be memorializing is tragedies.

    And, my response to the PETA people: Animals give me far more than people in life, but the goose population has no shortages these days. Seems an opportune time for people to be getting into the goose-down pillow trade.

  • G

    I would like to comment about "NannyState" why are you using a picture of an English 5 time cild muderer ? (wikipedia.org/wiki/Moors_murde... change it at least out of respect. Sorry to say...you sick F_ck !!

  • I'm not sure about all this 'hero' talk. The guy was a great pilot, a professional, just doing his job. What else could he do? Cry? See this great post at: www.StopTheWorldIWannaGetOff.c... for some critical thinking on all this fuss.

  • PKinNYC

    so he tackles it first??? Law & Order or one of the major movie studios???

  • r1b2

    I know folks here don't want to agree on this, but good job to Jen for keeping this as up to date as she did. While I was in my office yesterday trying to find detail on this, I visited gothamist and she's already assembled photos and a good bit of detail.

  • maevemealone

    Oh I'll agree with you whole heartedly. Gothamist is my go to place for events like this. I can't click around to all the news sites fast enough and Gothamist does a great job aggregating all the updates and sources. Kudos Gothamist and kudos Jen!

  • fakenewyorker

    i second this, you did a fantastic job jen/gothamist!

  • jaycjay

    "The plane actualy GAINS 100 ft of altitude, from 1,200 to 1,300 feet, one to two minutes after the descent began, while the pilot was centering on the Hudson. News reports are suggesting that all engines were out. Could the plane pull up 100 ft using flaps alone?"

    Sure. Well, it's not "using flaps" to do that; it's just using the momentum that it already had. That climb was most likely an intentional maneuver to bleed off speed prior to the landing. The basic principle in flight is that you can trade altitude for velocity and vice-versa. Since he reportedly thought at one point he might be able to make it to Teterborough, it makes sense that he'd have to slow the plane down once he decided that wasn't that possible. A climb would be the way to do that.

    Flaps, by the way, from what I can see from various pictures, were still extended from the takeoff. That also makes sense, at relatively slow speeds he would have left them in place to take advantage of the extra lift they'd give.

  • jaycjay

    "this is not the first time something like this happened. would it be that much of an expense to put a grill over the engines? a chain link fence? something?"

    Would make no difference at all. The bird carcass, while somewhat more mangled ahead of time, would still be drawn into the intake and the same damage would result.

    Aircraft manufacturers and everyone in aviation have struggled since the beginning of powered flight to find an answer to the danger of bird strikes. None of us here are going to come up with it.

    The most important aspect right now lies in "bird management" -- simply trying to keep them away from approach/landing paths. Everything that can be done specifically to the aircraft itself is being done.

  • ribaldry

    CNN just said that the birds that flew in to the jet's engines were Islamic geese.

  • nohateparade

    this is not the first time something like this happened. would it be that much of an expense to put a grill over the engines? a chain link fence? something?

  • tingo

    Wow. I wish there was an online way to research the pilot of your flight BEFORE you fly. I'd pay to double to fly with a captain with that much safety training experience...rather than getting some ex-crop dusting alchy you might get saddled with.

    Very good advertising for US airways too. Though the thought that an extra large pigeon can down an A320 is deeply troubling and some aerospace engineers oughta get on that problem.

    Sucks about the luggage.

  • Rocknrope

    I just read this from the Journal: "For the first time in 50 years of commercial jet flight, the pilots of US Airways Flight 1549 successfully executed one of the most technically challenging maneuvers, landing a jetliner on water without fatalities."

    So the previous instance of a pilot ditching a commercial plane in water and experiencing zero fatalities is...never.

    Cue the Top Gun theme....

  • moocowtoo

    This story is amazing, I love Gothamist for these types of things, quick updates, local information, good job!

  • NannyState

    LOL at that plane tied to lower Manhattan like a stringer of trout.

  • Mr Mel

    The jokes are acceptable because nobody died. That pilot and his crew are all heroes.

  • ANGRYGOD11

    While the pilots did a great job, if they could have just swung over a little bit and hit Bernie Madoff before hitting the Hudson, then it would prove God has a great sense of humor and perfect aim.

  • FelixtheCat & Christine Quinn'

    Sheikh Ali, 50, of West Caldwell, N.J., was in Charlotte awaiting a co-worker, Matt Kane, who was aboard Flight 1549.

    When Mr. Kane, who works at a telecom company in Connecticut, did not arrive in Charlotte, Mr. Ali sent a text message his colleague, “Where are you?”

    Mr. Kane replied, “I landed in the Hudson.

  • FelixtheCat & Christine Quinn'

    Here are pictures of the plane before the crash. http://quiteallright.blogspot.com/

  • citizenerased

    Why the fuck is 'god' getting all the credit?

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@gothamist.com