A little-noticed fee on Con Ed bills goes to finance energy efficiency projects throughout New York State, but a Times analysis of how the money gets distributed found that a disproportionate amount of NYC dollars gets out of town. The so-called SBC [System Benefits Charge] typically amounts to about a dollar a month for the average NYC Con Ed customer. According to the Times, local Con Ed customers paid half of the state's total SBC charges over the past decade, while about 59% percent of the rebates, loans and other benefits handed out by the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority went to fund projects outside of the metropolitan area.
The 250-employee agency that distributes the fund, which could add up to about $350 million this year, is governed by the Public Service Commission, whose five members are appointed by the governor. The amount of money at their disposal has ballooned, so now some state lawmakers are trying to bring it under legislative control. Democratic Assemblyman Kevin A. Cahill tells the Times, "It shouldn't be a mini-pork barrel."
And city officials say New Yorkers deserve a more appropriate proportion of the money, which is spent on things like an energy-efficient ice rink in West Nyack, or incandescent traffic lights in Syracuse that save more than four million kilowatt-hours a year. Closer to home, millions have been spent to recycle the steam produced by natural gas generators installed in office towers like The New York Times Building. The Pepsi-Cola bottling plant in College Point, Queens also used SBC funds to harness steam power, and the Times has an interesting article about that, as well.
Photo courtesy Deeper Sea





If energy is being conserved, is it really a huge deal if it's in Syracuse or Buffalo instead of NYC?
Oh right, I forgot, 1/8th of the state's land deserves all the money.
@TKaisen - The problem is that they are taking NYC money to conserve energy *and* money in other places in the state. Wouldn't you rather conserve the same amount of energy but benefit your local economy instead?
Yes, if all the money comes from that 1/8 of the state's land. Buffalo really is a huge source of income for the rest of the state. If NYC left the state, NYS would collapse.
I would be interested to see some new numbers in the coming years. All this talk of New York City paying more in tax dollars than it receives, whether to Albany or DC, was based mainly on Wall Street profits that did not exist. When the financial world is done deleveraging the numbers might tell another story.