<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Gothamist: Early Addition</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/12/23/early_addition_164.php</link>
<description>All comments for Early Addition</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2008 jen</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 19:40:49 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>jen@gothamist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>jen@gothamist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>smacky</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/12/23/early_addition_164.php#comment-1550366</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/12/23/early_addition_164.php#comment-1550366</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 22:27:50 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Burritoville?  Are f&apos;n kidding me???&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>RatherBe</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/12/23/early_addition_164.php#comment-1550339</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/12/23/early_addition_164.php#comment-1550339</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 21:22:39 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;As per the reasons I explained. 

Unless you have anything more substantial to post here then petty whining about my safety then I suggest you give up on this, or pay me to deliver your tree and I&apos;ll show you how safe it is. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>CR</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/12/23/early_addition_164.php#comment-1550336</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/12/23/early_addition_164.php#comment-1550336</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 21:02:12 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;I was probably safer riding with the tree than I was without it.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>RatherBe</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/12/23/early_addition_164.php#comment-1550328</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/12/23/early_addition_164.php#comment-1550328</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 20:50:39 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Narrow handlebars make it easier to slip between vehicles, which is generally unsafe (however common). They don&apos;t make you any safer. I speak from experience having ridden a bike with a 10 inch handlebar span for two years in NYC. 

Based on the speeds I was riding to accommodate the load on my back and the extra width of the road I used, I was probably safer riding with the tree than I was without it. 

I got home safe because there&apos;s nothing especially dangerous about doing something like this if you&apos;re reasonably aware of what&apos;s going on around you.

You can continue to disagree, but you&apos;re wrong about this being unsafe.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>CR</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/12/23/early_addition_164.php#comment-1550265</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/12/23/early_addition_164.php#comment-1550265</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 19:00:21 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;I never said that a wider bicycle was a safer bicycle, and if you think bike messengers are the epitome of safe cyclists, then you have your head up your ass.&quot;

I never said that &quot;messengers are the epitome of safe cyclists&quot; did I? Please show me where in my above post I wrote that. However, on NYC streets, where there&apos;s lots of traffic, narrower handlebars are safer. I don&apos;t care if the bike is being ridden by a messenger or my grandma. Narrower handlebars are safer, period.

And I&apos;m sorry, but I disagree: a huge tree hanging sideways off the back of the bike is in danger of being doored, snagged on a car, or something. But if you disagree that&apos;s cool. Glad you got home safe. Enjoy the tree!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>RatherBe</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/12/23/early_addition_164.php#comment-1550149</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/12/23/early_addition_164.php#comment-1550149</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:45:38 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;That doesn&apos;t make any sense at all - I wouldn&apos;t be doored in the situation you propose - part of the tree would. And it would likely just brush off the door. But again, I wasn&apos;t riding in the door zone so no chance of that happening. 

I never said that a wider bicycle was a safer bicycle, and if you think bike messengers are the epitome of safe cyclists, then you have your head up your ass. 
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>CR</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/12/23/early_addition_164.php#comment-1550118</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/12/23/early_addition_164.php#comment-1550118</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:29:13 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Yes! I am a huge idiot and my comment has ZERO validity because I left out a word. What was a thinking? You&apos;re right - you know EVERYTHING! I submit to you! I&apos;m gonna go eat a handgun now.

Your chances of being doored are greatly increased because you are now a much larger target. Would your body be directly hit by the door? Probably not. Could the door snag the tree as you&apos;re going by? Much more likely.

And if a wider bicycle is a safer bicycle then why do most experienced bike-messengers ride with narrow handlebars?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>RatherBe</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/12/23/early_addition_164.php#comment-1550042</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/12/23/early_addition_164.php#comment-1550042</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 15:30:26 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;That has to be the stupidest comment I&apos;ve read on here in a long time. 

- &quot;I am a huge advocate for using one&apos;s to transport..&quot; 

Using one&apos;s what? 

If anything, riding with something so large strapped to my back probably decreased my chances of being hit, and someone rode behind me to help ensure this wouldn&apos;t happen.

Also, care to explain how this has anything to do with my chance of getting doored? Since the tree was sticking WAAAAY out to the side, it&apos;d probably be pretty unlikely for me to end up getting doored.

Can I nominate you for the poorly worded moronic comment award?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>zodak</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/12/23/early_addition_164.php#comment-1550038</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/12/23/early_addition_164.php#comment-1550038</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 15:29:22 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;where are the pictures of the assistant school principal who spent all that money at vicky&apos;s? &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>CR</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/12/23/early_addition_164.php#comment-1549956</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/12/23/early_addition_164.php#comment-1549956</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 14:38:52 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;While I am a huge advocate for using one&apos;s to transport stuff around town, carrying a tree on the back of your bike, in that manner with the tree sticking WAAAAAAAAAAY out to the sides, has to be the STUPIDEST thing I&apos;ve seen in quite some time. Aside from being doored big time, the rider has just increased their chances of being hit by a car about 8,000 times. Seriously, where can I nominate this person for a Darwin Award?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>