Labor Department Announces Big Job Loss Numbers

2008_12_nawro.jpg
Photograph of Paul Nawrocki by Bebeto Matthews/AP; Nawrocki, whose employer, a toy company, went out of business, wears a sandwich board in Midtown, looking for a job (more here)

The Labor Department offered up grim news today: "U.S. employers axed payrolls by a shocking 533,000 in November for the weakest performance in 34 years," according to CNBC. Additionally, the unemployment rate is now 6.7%, the highest since 1993 (and higher than the 6.5% measured in October).

These numbers were far higher than what analysts were expecting. A Moody's economist told Bloomberg News, "The labor market capsized in November. The financial panic has hammered the economy and we are seeing a very broad-based decline in payrolls.” And naturally the news is causing the stock markets to fall.

The NY Times reports, "The employment report increased the likelihood that Congress, with the support of President-elect Barack Obama, will enact a stimulus package by late January that could exceed $500 billion over two years." An economist at U. Mass explains, "Basically $100 billion of public investment in such things as roads, bridges and levees would generate two million jobs. That would offset the two million jobs that we are now on track to lose by early next year.”

Email This Entry


Comments (4) [rss]

Why do these articles always mention that analysts are "surprised" or "didn't expect" that job losses keep rising? A good number of my friends lost their jobs in recent months, the rest of us know our companies are doing more layoffs and any of us could lose our job. The number of resumes my company has received for the few openings we have has quadrupled. I think these "analysts" need to lose their jobs and be replaced by people who know what's really going on!

Why do these articles always mention that analysts are "surprised" or "didn't expect" that job losses keep rising?

Read it again. It doesn't say they didn't expect losses to rise. They just didn't expect it to rise as high as it did. But then again, it's par for the course. Any time you have a Bush in the White House, you should hold on tight to your wallet.

Post a comment (Comment Policy)

Tips

Get your daily dose of New York first thing in the morning from our weekday newsletter, now in beta.

About Gothamist

Gothamist is a website about New York. More

Editor: Jen Chung
Publisher: Jake Dobkin

Newsmap

newsmap.jpg

Contribute

Latest Tip:


[more]

Latest Photo:

Subscribe

Use an RSS reader to stay up to date with the latest news and posts from Gothamist.

All Our RSS

Follow us