Paterson Recommends Less Severe MTA Fare Hike-- And Tolls for East River Crossings

#21, liberals like better services, efficiency, and fairness rather than letting everything erode to the point of no return or simply take away services and leave people in the cold.

Name me one government bureaucracy that is more efficient than any other business in the private sector?

And fairness??? Haha. How do you think ppl like Rangel, a Democrat himself, get cheap rent while every other sucker pays market value?

A. Excessive regulation that leads to loopholes for the rich, and agencies that are ripe for corruption.

Smaller government is always much better.

#20 are you kidding me? There are more cars on the road now than 10 years ago. People who live in areas under served by mass transit will drive. That's the fault of the sytem, not the individual.

Putting tolls on free bridges is ridiculous. There is just no way that you can set up toll booths at the Manhattan, Brooklyn and 59th st. bridges. The amount of traffic that would spill into the residential areas and beyond would be uncontrollable.

This whole thing stinks of mismanagement.

#21, liberals like better services, efficiency, and fairness rather than letting everything erode to the point of no return or simply take away services and leave people in the cold. Yes, that costs money. Unfortunately, you can't give tax breaks or special preferences to certain boroughs AND increase or even maintain a normal level of service. Too bad certain people never got that memo.

BTW, Florida is going to crush the Tide on Saturday.

#21, liberals like better services, efficiency, and fairness rather than letting everything erode to the point of no return. That costs money. Unfortunately, you can't give tax costs and increase or even maintain a normal level of spending. Too bad certain people never got that memo.

BTW, Florida is going to crush the Tide on Saturday.

Of course your car diminishes the quality of life -- to a certain degree, all vehicles do! They pollute, they make noise, they block the streets... .I mean, c'mon! It's not rock science.

Every lazy jerk from Long Island who choosed to drive into the city instead of take the LIRR -- or Brooklyn/Queens resident who just can't be bothered to take the subway -- is now going to have to pay for that luxury. Yep, seems fair to me (especially since NJ is already doing it!).

#19 - How do you figure "Free passage within the city is fundamental to an open and economically diverse society. Just as Manhattan people can come to Brooklyn, the reverse is true, has been true and will always be true."? FAR FAR more people travel between the boroughs by mass transit than by cars, and guess what - we pay!! Car drivers are a minute percentage of those traveling between the boroughs, and it is about time they pay for the congestion, pollution and diminishment in quality of life that they cause. For the most part, only those who can afford to not take mass transit choose to drive.

Tolls on the free bridges is not going to happen, so for all those who wish it, don't. Free passage within the city is fundamental to an open and economically diverse society. Just as Manhattan people can come to Brooklyn, the reverse is true, has been true and will always be true. No one borough is more or less important, and no group of people are either.

Stop the toll gripe.

everyone in this state also pays the MTA's extortion fee every time you buy anything at all as they also take a direct piece of the sales tax. They need to make some major cuts to their personnel and pension costs before I would give another cent to them.

Long Islanders already need coaxing to go into Manhattan, do they really want to make it more hyperinsulated than it already is?

Albany is swallowing its words.

Right #14, I didn't know there was even a commuter tax here at one point. I live in the city, so I get the taxes either way, but I remember having to file dc tax returns when I lived down there even when I moved out of DC. Seems like a good idea to me. Dc is a little different though, I'd bet good money that the % of people that work in DC but live outside of it is higher than in NYC, per capita, but I could be wrong.

#10, I stand corrected. It was the Pataki Puppet that repealled the law.

#11, that's on your employer, not the individual. I think #1 was inquiring about City and commuter taxes.

Taxes have unintended consequences.

Unfortunately, politicians, especially Democrats, do not understand this.

I'm fine with raising fares, but the tolls and payroll taxes on this mark the flurry of new taxes and tax hikes we'll face in 2009 and 2010.

It sounds hyperbolic, but I think this marks the beginning of the end for NYC. It's eventually going to become too expensive to conduct business here, and existing residents on their government subsidies or fixed incomes will be forced to move out.

9, that is not entirely true. if you work in NYC a portion of the payroll tax for your salary goes to NYC.

Guiliani oppposed the repeal the commuter tax. The mayor of NYC does not have such powers.

The tax was repealed by the state legislature in 1999 because Joe Bruno and Shelly Silver both thought the repeal would benefit their parties candidate in a special election for the State Senate in Rockland and Orange counties.

#1, if you live in one of the five boroughs, you have to pay the City tax. If you live outside those boroughs - Long Island, West Chester, NJ, CT, etc. you are NOT subject to City or commuter taxes. Guiliani repealled the commuter in 1999, which forfeited billions of dollars that could have been used for the 2nd Ave subway, the new Penn Station or just maintaince for MTA services.

#5, I'm sure the City can pass a law that amends the Brooklyn Bridge Charter. What was a noble idea in 1911 is unfortunately, not appropriate in 2009.

Is it just too much to ask for them to actually trim the enormous fat from the MTA and to actually automate the system like almost every other major metro rail system in the word outside of the 3rd world?!

I mean the bottom line is people in NYC pay the most taxes, the highest tolls, the largest business taxes, etc. How many more people and businesses do they want to chase out of the area? Particularly during these times.

Amazing photograph...

The two gents seated nearly mirror each other, and the briefcase guy seen through the coupling centered himself perfectly. Even the flotsam on the platform in the foreground agrees with the composition.

Bravo, awgreen, on a snapshot well done.

@3 I'm 99% certain that Brooklyn Bridge charter says there can never be a toll on that bridge.

@4 It's going to be a camera/e-z pass only system, no toll booths will be placed at the bridges.

Can't wait to see how traffic will flow once they put tollboths on the East River bridges. I totally agree the commuter tax should make a comeback.

I understand that most people will be outraged by the East River tolls, but other bridges have tolled, so this appears to be more fair and perhaps it will ease congestion downtown since people drive there to avoid tolls.

On the other hand, I don't think a payroll tax is a good idea right now. It will encourage companies to layoff workers to save a buck. I do think the reinstatement of the commuter tax makes more sense. Have the worker decide if it's feasible to commute to NYC to work or if he/she should look for work elsewhere. If he/she chooses the latter, then someone from NYC could take that open position.

Further, the MTA should consider proposals to ask the State to create a lotto game just for transit projects. Finally, as many people on this site have mentioned recently, the MTA should consider corporate sponsors for subway stations.

They suspended the 'commuter tax' a while back, with the idea that it would encourage more businesses to set up shop in the city. I'm all for bringing it back.

At one point I moved to VA but still worked in DC, they still charge DC tax on my paycheck, do they do that up here for all these people that work in the city but live in the burbs? If not, why not?