<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Gothamist: Everything You Ever Wanted to Know About Landmarks Commission</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/12/02/everything_you_ever_wanted_to_know.php</link>
<description>All comments for Everything You Ever Wanted to Know About Landmarks Commission</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2008 jen</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 12:00:31 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>jen@gothamist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>jen@gothamist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>JGNY</title>
<link>http://gothamist.com/2008/12/02/everything_you_ever_wanted_to_know.php#comment-1529696</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gothamist.com/2008/12/02/everything_you_ever_wanted_to_know.php#comment-1529696</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 12:16:59 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;This was an excellent series but I am more puzzeled then ever as to how the LPC operates and the criteria it uses to establish a building as a landmark. How could 2 Columbus Circle not be landmarked and Pei&apos;s dorm towers at NYU be landmarked? Personally Pei&apos;s buildings are well executed but hardly unique whereas Stone&apos;s was one of kind.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>