Upon outrage over news that he occupied four rent-stabilized apartments, Representative Charles Rangel said in July he would give up one used as a campaign office. Now, two and a half months later, Rangel's campaign office is still at Lenox Terrace, according to the NY Post. A lawyer for Rangel, who pays $630/month while the unit's market value is $1,700-2,005 (and rent stabilization only applies to residential use), says, "The campaign identified a new office in a newly restored brownstone in Harlem within three weeks of Mr. Rangel's announcement that he was leaving the Lenox Terrace space. The campaign will be the first tenants in the building, and it had to wait for the construction to be completed." But a government watchdog group thinks Rangel is being "disingenuous."





It's time for Charlie to go.
I sort of wonder...if you were a politician whose use of a rent-stabilized apartment for a campaign office were under fire, wouldn't you move out immediately? On the other hand, the lease is next month, so do you stay to finish it out?
He can't "stay" because he's not living in his office. The lease is invalid.
unfit for office
I think Rangel is just too busy and old for this type of partisan sniping (I mean the Post not CREW). The guy is hardly a slacker in the House. This pales in comparison to LA Rep Bill Jefferson and really even AK Senator Ted Stevens.
ever get the feeling that of the 535 members of Congress, most of them should be sent to jail for some sort of crime?
This proves the notion anyone who wants to hold public office probably shouldn't.
As a vet, I once felt proud of him...but now, we need change. Like the title of the old movie ..."Goodbye Charlie."